Semantic Alignment of AI Models: Concept Collapse, Checkpoint Dynamics, and Cross-Lingual Transfer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01585v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 01:41:04 GMT
• Title: Semantic Alignment of AI Models: Concept Collapse, Checkpoint Dynamics, and Cross-Lingual Transfer
• Abstract summary: This work demonstrates how methods can be used to rigorously compare these spaces to low dimensional and interpretable baselines.<n>These multi-modal model alignment tests make it possible to track model adaptations test phrase understanding across multiple languages.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Language model benchmarking is a difficult task. Outcome reasoning alone does not test the model's conceptualization of language and popular open-source benchmarks are quickly saturated or ingested as training data. It is important to test the model's output, but augmenting these tests by characterizing semantic structure gives more insight to how models relate abstract concepts. However, the high dimensional embedding spaces are not easy to interpret. This work demonstrates how topological methods can be used to rigorously compare these spaces to low dimensional and interpretable baselines like ontologies and curated knowledge graphs. These multi-modal alignment tests make it possible to track model adaptations and test phrase understanding across multiple languages.

Related papers

• Persistent Convolution: A Topological Framework for AI Alignment Testing and Semantic Space Characterization [0.0]
  This work develops and demonstrates a topology-based multi-modal alignment test to make deployment, selection, and comparison of opaque models more interpretable.<n>These methods also offer an intuitive connection to possibility theory and a unified decision theoretic framework from data to deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T04:12:21Z)
• From Text to Graph: Leveraging Graph Neural Networks for Enhanced Explainability in NLP [3.864700176441583]
  This study proposes a novel methodology to achieve explainability in natural language processing tasks.<n>It automatically converts sentences into graphs and maintains semantics through nodes and relations.<n>Experiments delivered promising results in determining the most critical components within the text structure for a given classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T18:55:58Z)
• Closed-Form Training Dynamics Reveal Learned Features and Linear Structure in Word2Vec-like Models [5.015875080287129]
  Self-supervised word embedding algorithms such as word2vec provide a minimal setting for studying representation learning in language modeling.<n>We show that both the training dynamics and the final performance on downstream tasks are empirically very similar to those of word2vec.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T02:16:48Z)
• Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
  Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts) This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z)
• Transparency at the Source: Evaluating and Interpreting Language Models With Access to the True Distribution [4.01799362940916]
  We present a setup for training, evaluating and interpreting neural language models, that uses artificial, language-like data. The data is generated using a massive probabilistic grammar, that is itself derived from a large natural language corpus. With access to the underlying true source, our results show striking differences and outcomes in learning dynamics between different classes of words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T12:03:01Z)
• Meaning Representations from Trajectories in Autoregressive Models [106.63181745054571]
  We propose to extract meaning representations from autoregressive language models by considering the distribution of all possible trajectories extending an input text. This strategy is prompt-free, does not require fine-tuning, and is applicable to any pre-trained autoregressive model. We empirically show that the representations obtained from large models align well with human annotations, outperform other zero-shot and prompt-free methods on semantic similarity tasks, and can be used to solve more complex entailment and containment tasks that standard embeddings cannot handle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T04:35:58Z)
• Opening the Black Box: Analyzing Attention Weights and Hidden States in Pre-trained Language Models for Non-language Tasks [0.8889304968879164]
  We apply a pre-trained language model to constrained arithmetic problems with hierarchical structure, to analyze their attention weight scores and hidden states. The investigation reveals promising results, with the model addressing hierarchical problems in a moderately structured manner, similar to human problem-solving strategies. The attention analysis allows us to hypothesize that the model can generalize to longer sequences in ListOps dataset, a conclusion later confirmed through testing on sequences longer than those in the training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T11:48:07Z)
• BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing [55.058258437125524]
  We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing. We benchmark eight language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API. Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or surpass state-of-the-art methods for syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T18:34:11Z)
• Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanations [99.7035899290924]
  Language models must consider various features to predict a token, such as its part of speech, number, tense, or semantics. Existing explanation methods conflate evidence for all these features into a single explanation, which is less interpretable for human understanding. We show that contrastive explanations are quantifiably better than non-contrastive explanations in verifying major grammatical phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:32:24Z)
• Prototypical Representation Learning for Relation Extraction [56.501332067073065]
  This paper aims to learn predictive, interpretable, and robust relation representations from distantly-labeled data. We learn prototypes for each relation from contextual information to best explore the intrinsic semantics of relations. Results on several relation learning tasks show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state-of-the-art relational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T08:11:43Z)
• Unnatural Language Inference [48.45003475966808]
  We find that state-of-the-art NLI models, such as RoBERTa and BART, are invariant to, and sometimes even perform better on, examples with randomly reordered words. Our findings call into question the idea that our natural language understanding models, and the tasks used for measuring their progress, genuinely require a human-like understanding of syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T20:40:48Z)
• Grounded Compositional Outputs for Adaptive Language Modeling [59.02706635250856]
  A language model's vocabulary$-$typically selected before training and permanently fixed later$-$affects its size. We propose a fully compositional output embedding layer for language models. To our knowledge, the result is the first word-level language model with a size that does not depend on the training vocabulary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T07:21:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.