Persistent Convolution: A Topological Framework for AI Alignment Testing and Semantic Space Characterization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29008v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 04:12:21 GMT
• Title: Persistent Convolution: A Topological Framework for AI Alignment Testing and Semantic Space Characterization
• Abstract summary: This work develops and demonstrates a topology-based multi-modal alignment test to make deployment, selection, and comparison of opaque models more interpretable.<n>These methods also offer an intuitive connection to possibility theory and a unified decision theoretic framework from data to deployment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern opaque AI models prize performance over interpretability, which makes testing difficult. However, formal statistical tests conducted on a model's embedding space can provide robust characterizations of semantic structure, concept separation, and knowledge graph alignment. Model developers would benefit from a model comparison technique that leverages human-curated knowledge structures to test alignment. The scale of the input space for even relatively simple tasks motivates the need for alignment checks that augment standard outcome reasoning. This work develops and demonstrates a topology-based multi-modal alignment test to make deployment, selection, and comparison of opaque models more interpretable. These methods also offer an intuitive connection to possibility theory and a unified decision theoretic framework from data to deployment.

Related papers

• Semantic Alignment of AI Models: Concept Collapse, Checkpoint Dynamics, and Cross-Lingual Transfer [0.0]
  This work demonstrates how methods can be used to rigorously compare these spaces to low dimensional and interpretable baselines.<n>These multi-modal model alignment tests make it possible to track model adaptations test phrase understanding across multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T01:41:04Z)
• Structure-Adaptive Conformal Inference for Large-Scale Out-of-Distribution Testing [1.867982979635437]
  This paper addresses structured out-of-distribution (OOD) testing in high-stakes machine learning applications.<n>We propose the structure-adaptive conformal q-value (SCQ) and pseudo-score-guided automated model selection (P-TAMS)<n>P-TAMS adapts conformalized model selection to structured OOD testing across a toolbox of candidate models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T01:28:16Z)
• ABLE: Representing and Mapping LLMs via Attribution-Based Large-model Embedding [23.27523995613204]
  We propose ABLE (Attribution-Based Large-model Embedding), a framework that leverages the interpretability space to construct model representations.<n>By aggregating gradient-based feature attributions via a tokenizer-agnostic word-level alignment, ABLE captures model-specific input-sensitivity patterns.<n>Our training-free approach achieves competitive or superior performance in relation prediction, model routing, and benchmark score prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T04:55:11Z)
• Reasoning Palette: Modulating Reasoning via Latent Contextualization for Controllable Exploration for (V)LMs [49.66344956133349]
  Reasoning capacity shapes both inference-time performance and reinforcement learning (RL) training for large (vision-) language models.<n>This paper proposes Reasoning Palette, a novel latent-modulation framework that endows the model with a latent variable for strategic contextualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T03:32:53Z)
• ProtoTS: Learning Hierarchical Prototypes for Explainable Time Series Forecasting [25.219624871510376]
  We propose ProtoTS, a novel interpretable forecasting framework that achieves both high accuracy and transparent decision-making.<n>ProtoTS computes instance-prototype similarity based on a denoised representation that preserves abundant heterogeneous information.<n> Experiments on multiple realistic benchmarks, including a newly released LOF dataset, show that ProtoTS not only exceeds existing methods in forecast accuracy but also delivers expert-steerable interpretations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T07:10:21Z)
• The CoT Encyclopedia: Analyzing, Predicting, and Controlling how a Reasoning Model will Think [81.38614558541772]
  We introduce the CoT Encyclopedia, a framework for analyzing and steering model reasoning.<n>Our method automatically extracts diverse reasoning criteria from model-generated CoTs.<n>We show that this framework produces more interpretable and comprehensive analyses than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T11:31:02Z)
• Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
  Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space. However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts. We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z)
• Learning to Select Prototypical Parts for Interpretable Sequential Data Modeling [7.376829794171344]
  We propose a Self-Explaining Selective Model (SESM) that uses a linear combination of prototypical concepts to explain its own predictions. For better interpretability, we design multiple constraints including diversity, stability, and locality as training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T01:42:47Z)
• Switchable Representation Learning Framework with Self-compatibility [50.48336074436792]
  We propose a Switchable representation learning Framework with Self-Compatibility (SFSC) SFSC generates a series of compatible sub-models with different capacities through one training process. SFSC achieves state-of-the-art performance on the evaluated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T16:46:32Z)
• Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning [72.84105256353801]
  Learning causal structure poses a search problem that typically involves evaluating structures using a score or independence test. We train a variational inference model to predict the causal structure from observational/interventional data. Our models exhibit robust generalization capabilities under substantial distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:37:08Z)
• Instance-Based Neural Dependency Parsing [56.63500180843504]
  We develop neural models that possess an interpretable inference process for dependency parsing. Our models adopt instance-based inference, where dependency edges are extracted and labeled by comparing them to edges in a training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T05:30:52Z)
• A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification [52.879658637466605]
  We develop a list of diagnostic properties for evaluating existing explainability techniques. We compare the saliency scores assigned by the explainability techniques with human annotations of salient input regions to find relations between a model's performance and the agreement of its rationales with human ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T12:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.