Studying, Identifying, and Fixing Hidden Technical Debt in AI-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02638v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:44:33 GMT
• Title: Studying, Identifying, and Fixing Hidden Technical Debt in AI-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems
• Abstract summary: This thesis aims to characterize AI-CPS technical debt (TD) and propose approaches for its identification and repair.<n>In a first phase, we characterize AI-CPS TD by analyzing AI ecosystems and AI-CPS repositories, as well as interviewing developers.<n>We plan to develop and validate an automated tool that supports agentic AI solutions to monitor, govern, and repay AI-CPS TD.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) components are increasingly pervasive in several software systems, including Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs). AI-CPS are used in several domains, including autonomous vehicles, industry, home automation, robotics, and healthcare. Being composed of hardware, AI components, and conventional modules, AI-CPS can exhibit technical debt (TD) that is peculiar and potentially more challenging than that of conventional systems. This thesis aims to characterize AI-CPS TD and propose approaches for its identification and repair. In a first phase, we characterize AI-CPS TD by analyzing AI ecosystems and AI-CPS repositories, as well as interviewing developers. Based on the acquired knowledge, we define approaches to identify and mitigate such TD. Finally, we plan to develop and validate an automated tool that supports agentic AI solutions to monitor, govern, and repay AI-CPS TD.

Related papers

• From AI Technical Debt to Agentic Technical Debt: A Systematic Mapping of Root Causes and Manifestations in Agentic AI Systems [11.878368077620337]
  This paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems.<n>We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities.<n>Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T05:09:28Z)
• Securing Agentic AI Systems -- A Multilayer Security Framework [0.0]
  Securing Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems requires addressing the complex cyber risks introduced by autonomous, decision-making, and adaptive behaviors.<n>Existing AI security frameworks do not adequately address these challenges or the unique nuances of agentic AI.<n>This research develops a lifecycle-aware security framework specifically designed for agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:22:25Z)
• Explain and Monitor Deep Learning Models for Computer Vision using Obz AI [2.406359246841227]
  Obz AI is a comprehensive software ecosystem designed to facilitate state-of-the-art explainability and observability for vision AI systems.<n>Obz AI provides a seamless integration pipeline, from a Python client library to a full-stack analytics dashboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T16:46:21Z)
• Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective [0.0]
  Concepts of alignment, agency, and autonomy have become central to AI safety, governance, and control.<n>This paper traces the historical, philosophical, and technical evolution of these concepts, emphasizing how their definitions influence AI development, deployment, and oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T21:37:20Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Towards an AI-Enhanced Cyber Threat Intelligence Processing Pipeline [0.0]
  This paper explores the potential of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) We provide a blueprint of an AI-enhanced CTI processing pipeline, and detail its components and functionalities. We discuss ethical dilemmas, potential biases, and the imperative for transparency in AI-driven decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T19:03:56Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.