DiffImaginE: Imagine to Verify Entity Types with Diffusion
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03025v3
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 02:36:54 GMT
- Title: DiffImaginE: Imagine to Verify Entity Types with Diffusion
- Abstract summary: We introduce DiffImaginE, which formulates MNER type verification as conditional latent diffusion inference.<n>Given span-localised visual evidence, a type-conditioned denoiser predicts noise injected into its standardised latent.<n>The resulting denoising error provides an ELBO-consistent surrogate for type-conditional negative log-likelihood.
- Score: 17.922112345279643
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal named entity recognition (MNER) determines whether each candidate span and entity-type hypothesis is supported by joint textual and visual evidence. Existing imagine-and-compare verifiers map each (span, type) pair to one predicted visual feature, compressing diverse visual realisations into a single prototype and providing a compatibility score without explicit probabilistic semantics. We introduce DiffImaginE, which formulates MNER type verification as conditional latent diffusion inference. Given span-localised visual evidence, a type-conditioned denoiser predicts noise injected into its standardised latent. The resulting denoising error provides an ELBO-consistent surrogate for type-conditional negative log-likelihood, allowing competing type hypotheses to be ranked by how well they explain the observation. DiffImaginE retains a standard multimodal encoder stack and replaces the deterministic verifier with a classifier-free-guided diffusion scorer trained using Min-SNR weighting. We directly supervise per-type diffusion scores as classification logits, learn aggregation across noise levels, and use antithetic sampling to reduce Monte Carlo comparison variance. Our analysis shows that classifier-free guidance sharpens the induced type posterior and characterises when antithetic pairing reduces variance at equal denoiser cost. Experiments on Twitter-2015 and Twitter-2017 show consistent gains over a matched deterministic ImaginE control under the same encoder, auxiliary objectives, and evaluation protocol, supported by ablations and paired significance tests.
Related papers
- Causal Variational Deep Embedding: A Family of Interventional Generators for Confounded Images [23.146237151956765]
We show that CauVaDE produces diverse interventional samples and improves FID against an unconfounded reference.<n> Experiments on image data benchmarks show that CauVaDE produces diverse interventional samples and improves FID against an unconfounded reference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-19T23:59:14Z) - A Fiber Criterion for Representation Identifiability in Supervised Learning [0.0]
Supervised learning evaluates predictors through their input-output behavior.<n>This paper formalizes the resulting representation-level identifiability problem.<n>The results clarify that representation-level claims require assumptions, objectives, measurements, or inductive biases beyond supervised predictive behavior alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T08:25:07Z) - VAE-Inf: A statistically interpretable generative paradigm for imbalanced classification [8.677199689027772]
We propose a two-stage framework to bridge the gap between generative modeling and discriminative classification.<n>For inference, we introduce a projection-based score that admits a natural hypothesis testing interpretation.<n>Experiments on diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves competitive performance against other approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T07:50:56Z) - PASA: Attack Agnostic Unsupervised Adversarial Detection using Prediction & Attribution Sensitivity Analysis [2.5347892611213614]
Deep neural networks for classification are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations to input samples lead to incorrect predictions.
We develop a practical method for this characteristic of model prediction and feature attribution to detect adversarial samples.
Our approach demonstrates competitive performance even when an adversary is aware of the defense mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T21:22:21Z) - Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice.
We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z) - Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal
Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space.
However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts.
We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z) - Variational Classification [51.2541371924591]
We derive a variational objective to train the model, analogous to the evidence lower bound (ELBO) used to train variational auto-encoders.
Treating inputs to the softmax layer as samples of a latent variable, our abstracted perspective reveals a potential inconsistency.
We induce a chosen latent distribution, instead of the implicit assumption found in a standard softmax layer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T17:47:19Z) - Visualizing Classifier Adjacency Relations: A Case Study in Speaker
Verification and Voice Anti-Spoofing [72.4445825335561]
We propose a simple method to derive 2D representation from detection scores produced by an arbitrary set of binary classifiers.
Based upon rank correlations, our method facilitates a visual comparison of classifiers with arbitrary scores.
While the approach is fully versatile and can be applied to any detection task, we demonstrate the method using scores produced by automatic speaker verification and voice anti-spoofing systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-11T13:03:33Z) - Autoencoding Variational Autoencoder [56.05008520271406]
We study the implications of this behaviour on the learned representations and also the consequences of fixing it by introducing a notion of self consistency.
We show that encoders trained with our self-consistency approach lead to representations that are robust (insensitive) to perturbations in the input introduced by adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T14:16:14Z) - Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle.
In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize.
Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z) - Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Adversarial Mirrored AutoEncoders [51.691585766702744]
We propose a variant of Adversarial Autoencoder which uses a mirrored Wasserstein loss in the discriminator to enforce better semantic-level reconstruction.
We put forward an alternative measure of anomaly score to replace the reconstruction-based metric.
Our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods for anomaly detection on several OOD detection benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-24T08:26:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.