AI Agent Economics: Can Autonomous Economic Behavior Emerge among AI Agents under Minimal External Conditions?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03076v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 03:40:08 GMT
• Title: AI Agent Economics: Can Autonomous Economic Behavior Emerge among AI Agents under Minimal External Conditions?
• Abstract summary: We ask whether economic relations emerge when agents receive executable mechanisms for work, transfer, elections, and allocation but no social or economic strategy.<n>We develop a two-stage framework comprising a no-production boundary test and 24 independent six-agent worlds across GPT and DeepSeek.<n>With verified work and scarce task access, transfers, loans, access promises, vote-for-access exchanges, and allocation strategies emerge.
• Score: 2.1550457540704713
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent studies commonly place AI agents in predefined games, markets, or roles, making it difficult to distinguish endogenous economic organization from behavior inherited from the scenario. We ask whether economic relations emerge when agents receive executable mechanisms for work, transfer, elections, and allocation but no prescribed social or economic strategy. We define AI Agent Economics as systems of production, allocation, consumption, exchange, and institutions that alter agents' future feasible actions. We develop a two-stage framework comprising a no-production boundary test and 24 independent six-agent worlds across GPT and DeepSeek. Without productive tasks, agents communicate and govern resource provision but show no substantive inter-agent transfer activity. With verified work and scarce task access, transfers, loans, access promises, vote-for-access exchanges, and allocation strategies emerge. Holding the election interface fixed, executable allocation authority increases differentiation while reducing failed allocation and prolonged exclusion. When energy becomes symbolic, continuation support disappears, yet competition over task access persists. These findings show that organization follows executable rights and resource consequences rather than role labels or prompt language, and motivate governance audits of the mechanisms that actually constrain agents' future actions.

Related papers

• Poisoning Agentic Alpha: Adversarial Vulnerabilities Across Roles and Architectures in Multi-Agent Trading Systems [103.90831279037094]
  LLM-based multi-agent trading systems are moving rapidly from research prototypes to live deployments that control real assets.<n>A corrupted signal can propagate to the final decision and translate into realized financial loss.<n>We present the first systematic empirical study in the financial domain to characterize how an adversarial signal enters a multi-agent trading system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:07:37Z)
• Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions [80.74432115171285]
  We study how a population of agents self-orchestrate and self-adapt into stronger collective intelligence without centralized control.<n>Inspired by Friedrich Hayek's economic theory of decentralized coordination in markets, we study this question through an agent economy in which agents compete via auctions for the right to act, exchange payments, and accumulate wealth from environmental rewards.<n>We show that, with weak agents, the economy produces emergent multi-step reasoning strategies and outperforms stronger monolithic baselines across five agentic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T20:21:09Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI [49.05972944310475]
  We show that when contracts cannot distinguish all relevant future contingencies, there is a strictly positive welfare loss that no realistic mechanism can eliminate.<n>We show that prosocial agents, who weigh others' welfare alongside their own, can close this gap and achieve outcomes that are socially superior and individually beneficial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T19:37:07Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• Agentic Inequality [6.034016224014177]
  "Agentic inequality" is the potential disparities in power, opportunity, and outcomes stemming from differential access to, and capabilities of, AI agents.<n>This paper explores how agents could both exacerbate existing divides and, under the right conditions, serve as a powerful equalising force.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T14:32:46Z)
• Virtual Agent Economies [12.298551147857822]
  We propose the "sandbox economy" as a framework for analyzing this emergent system.<n>Our current trajectory points toward a spontaneous emergence of a vast and highly permeable AI agent economy.<n>Here we discuss a number of possible design choices that may lead to safely steerable AI agent markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T11:20:11Z)
• The Agentic Economy [46.77230659526348]
  We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses.<n>This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:51:36Z)
• Can We Govern the Agent-to-Agent Economy? [0.0]
  Current approaches to AI governance often fall short in anticipating a future where AI agents manage critical tasks.<n>We highlight emerging concepts in the industry to inform research and development efforts in anticipation of a future decentralized agentic economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T00:50:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.