Making AI Visible, Not Vanished: How AI Policies Reshape Developer Experience on GitHub

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03329v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:39:07 GMT
• Title: Making AI Visible, Not Vanished: How AI Policies Reshape Developer Experience on GitHub
• Abstract summary: We present the first large-scale empirical study of AI governance policies in Open Source Software (OSS)<n>We identify 385 projects that adopted AI policies and derive TRACE, a framework capturing five governance dimensions.<n>Our results show that AI governance primarily regulates rather than prohibits AI-assisted development.
• Score: 11.19606367764924
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI is rapidly reshaping Open Source Software (OSS) software development,prompting projects to introduce policies governing AI-assisted contributions. However, little is known about how these policies differ or whether they influence developer experience. We present the first large-scale empirical study of AI governance policies in OSS. Analyzing 29,624 GitHub repositories, we identify 385 projects that adopted AI policies and derive TRACE, a framework capturing five governance dimensions: Transparency, Responsibility, Attribution, Constraints, and Enforcement. We further classify policies into five governance families and estimate their effects using propensity-score matching and longitudinal difference-in-differences analysis. Our results show that AI governance primarily regulates rather than prohibits AI-assisted development. Policy adoption brings maintainer engagement, increased AI disclosure, richer review interactions, and improved code quality while AI-assisted contributions continue to grow. Governance design matters: policies emphasizing transparency and responsibility produced stronger community and quality outcomes than restrictive approaches alone. Our findings show how different AI governance strategies shape developer experience and provide evidence to help OSS communities design effective AI policies.

Related papers

• AI Where It Matters: Where, Why, and How Developers Want AI Support in Daily Work [3.1984206905916]
  Generative AI is reshaping software work, yet we lack clear guidance on where developers most need and want support.<n>We report a large-scale, mixed-methods study of N=860 developers that examines where, why, and how they seek or limit AI help.<n>Our results offer concrete, contextual guidance for delivering AI where it matters to developers and their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T10:51:03Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy [163.43609502905707]
  This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of AI.<n>An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:20:58Z)
• Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios.<n>Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• The AI Pentad, the CHARME$^{2}$D Model, and an Assessment of Current-State AI Regulation [5.231576332164012]
  This paper aims to establish a unifying model for AI regulation from the perspective of core AI components.<n>We first introduce the AI Pentad, which comprises the five essential components of AI.<n>We then review AI regulatory enablers, including AI registration and disclosure, AI monitoring, and AI enforcement mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T22:58:41Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Operationalising Responsible AI Using a Pattern-Oriented Approach: A Case Study on Chatbots in Financial Services [11.33499498841489]
  Responsible AI is the practice of developing and using AI systems in a way that benefits the humans, society, and environment. Various responsible AI principles have been released recently, but those principles are very abstract and not practical enough. To bridge the gap, we adopt a pattern-oriented approach and build a responsible AI pattern catalogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T23:11:03Z)
• Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering [20.644494592443245]
  We present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T00:09:08Z)
• Aligning Artificial Intelligence with Humans through Public Policy [0.0]
  This essay outlines research on AI that learn structures in policy data that can be leveraged for downstream tasks. We believe this represents the "comprehension" phase of AI and policy, but leveraging policy as a key source of human values to align AI requires "understanding" policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T21:31:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.