AI World Cup 2026: Benchmarking Large Language Models for End-to-End Football Tournament Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03416v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 10:07:14 GMT
• Title: AI World Cup 2026: Benchmarking Large Language Models for End-to-End Football Tournament Prediction
• Abstract summary: This paper reports the completed emphAI World Cup benchmark, in which ten-based assistants made a single pre-tournament forecast of the entire 2026 FIFA World Cup.<n>Forecasts covered group-stage scores, group rankings, the knockout bracket, final placings, confidence values, and short explanations.<n>GPT-5.5 Thinking finished first with 744 points, followed by GPT-5.5 with 717, Gemini with 699, and Qwen 3.7 with 687.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are now regularly asked to forecast real-world events, but comparisons are often difficult because models receive different information, use different tools, and are evaluated under different rules. This paper reports the completed \emph{AI World Cup} benchmark, in which ten LLM-based assistants made a single pre-tournament forecast of the entire 2026 FIFA World Cup. Every submission used the same tournament snapshot, prompt, JSON schema, and scoring procedure. The forecasts covered group-stage scores, group rankings, the knockout bracket, final placings, confidence values, and short explanations. After all 104 matches had been played, GPT-5.5 Thinking finished first with 744 points, followed by GPT-5.5 with 717, Gemini with 699, and Qwen 3.7 with 687. GPT-5.5 Thinking was also the only model to select Spain, which defeated Argentina 1--0 in the final, as champion. The final ranking was driven mainly by knockout performance: total score was strongly correlated with knockout points ($r=0.986$), but showed little relationship with group-stage match points ($r=0.055$), group-standing points ($r=-0.103$), or their combined pre-knockout score ($r=-0.054$). Match-level accuracy produced a different ordering. Claude Sonnet 4.6 correctly predicted the largest number of group-stage outcomes (63.89\%) but placed sixth overall. Average self-reported confidence was also unrelated to either outcome accuracy ($r=-0.060$) or total score ($r=-0.067$). The results suggest that forecasting a complete tournament tests something different from predicting matches one at a time, while also showing how strongly a bracket-based leaderboard can depend on scoring design. The benchmark materials, raw responses, and scoring code are released to support replication and future extensions.

Related papers

• Forecasting the Winner of a Live Tennis Match [2.9832083520093353]
  This study examines how pre-match and live information can be most effectively integrated into a model to produce accurate win-probability estimates.<n>The analysis uses 8,222 Grand Slam matches containing a total of 1,505,355 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T15:21:58Z)
• From Score Matrices to Football-Aware Match-State Simulation: An Auditable LLM Harness for Exact-Score Reranking [0.0]
  Football score forecasting combines a strong statistical core with a difficult contextual edge.<n>We combine both components through an auditable information harness.<n>On a replay of the first 150 matches of the 2025-26 English Premier League, V1 achieved 10.0% Top-1 and 26.7% Top-3 exact-score accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T16:34:53Z)
• WorldCup Arena: Prospective, Leakage-Free Evaluation of Frontier LLMs on a Live Tournament [1.4943316571343976]
  Six frontier LLMs were asked to fill in a seven-market prediction card for all 104 matches.<n>No answer existed when the question was asked, so the evaluation is leakage-free by construction.<n>What the tournament establishes is a set of behaviours the six systems share.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T17:59:55Z)
• WorldCupArena: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Language Models and Deep-Research Agents on Football Forecasting [10.941871398755403]
  We present WorldCupArena, a benchmark for language models and deep-research agents.<n>It predicts the result and score, likely players and events, match statistics, and the outcome of the competition.<n>We report result accuracy, exact-score accuracy, and a scoreline score that gives some credit when a predicted score is close but not exact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T15:52:48Z)
• FIFA World Cup 2026 as a Contamination-Free Benchmark for LLM Forecasting Agents: Four Models, a Bookmaker, and 104 Matches [2.8722431362974077]
  We introduce WC2026-Agents, a benchmark and dataset for evaluating large language models (LLMs)<n>For every one of the 104 matches of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, four frontier models ran an identical search-act-reflect loop.<n>We pair the four agents with a fifth competitor drawn from the same information environment -- the pre-match betting market.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T10:00:11Z)
• Reasoning Arena: Trace Tournaments When Verifiable Rewards Fall Short [51.667769734342635]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a leading paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of large language models.<n>We propose Reasoning Arena, an adaptive training framework that routes such non-diverse reward groups to a judge system instead of discarding them.<n>We show that Reasoning Arena consistently outperforms the RLVR baseline by 7.6% on average in competition mathematics and coding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T11:57:17Z)
• Benchmarking Speech-to-Speech Translation Models [55.00303727199927]
  Speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) has advanced rapidly, but offline evaluation lacks a unified protocol.<n>We introduce a benchmarking framework integrating 46 metrics across eight dimensions.<n>We deploy it on 1,248 model-language configurations from FLEURS and CVSS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T07:01:33Z)
• NCAA Bracket Prediction Using Machine Learning and Combinatorial Fusion Analysis [1.1493781265003744]
  We leverage rankings to generate team rankings for the 2024 dataset using Combinatorial Fusion Analysis.<n>Our result has an accuracy rate of $74.60%$, higher than the best of the ten popular public ranking systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T16:01:01Z)
• Consistency Checks for Language Model Forecasters [54.62507816753479]
  We measure the performance of forecasters in terms of the consistency of their predictions on different logically-related questions.<n>We build an automated evaluation system that generates a set of base questions, instantiates consistency checks from these questions, elicits predictions of the forecaster, and measures the consistency of the predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:51:35Z)
• Momentum Capture and Prediction System Based on Wimbledon Open2023 Tournament Data [4.733690536516437]
  This study introduces an evaluation model that synergizes the Entropy Weight Method (EWM) and Gray Relation Analysis (GRA) to quantify momentum's impact on match outcomes. The model's ability to identify the influence of specific factors on match dynamics, as bilateral distance run during points, demonstrates its prowess.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T19:14:49Z)
• GCN-WP -- Semi-Supervised Graph Convolutional Networks for Win Prediction in Esports [84.55775845090542]
  We propose a semi-supervised win prediction model for esports based on graph convolutional networks. GCN-WP integrates over 30 features about the match and players and employs graph convolution to classify games based on their neighborhood. Our model achieves state-of-the-art prediction accuracy when compared to machine learning or skill rating models for LoL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T21:38:07Z)
• Unifying Language Learning Paradigms [96.35981503087567]
  We present a unified framework for pre-training models that are universally effective across datasets and setups. We show how different pre-training objectives can be cast as one another and how interpolating between different objectives can be effective. Our model also achieve strong results at in-context learning, outperforming 175B GPT-3 on zero-shot SuperGLUE and tripling the performance of T5-XXL on one-shot summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T19:32:20Z)
• CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamification [126.85096257968414]
  We construct benchmarks that test the abilities of modern natural language understanding models. In this work, we propose gamification as a framework for data construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T06:49:15Z)
• Team Enigma at ArgMining-EMNLP 2021: Leveraging Pre-trained Language Models for Key Point Matching [0.0]
  We present the system description for our submission towards the Key Point Analysis Shared Task at ArgMining 2021. We leveraged existing state of the art pre-trained language models along with incorporating additional data and features extracted from the inputs (topics, key points, and arguments) to improve performance. We were able to achieve mAP strict and mAP relaxed score of 0.872 and 0.966 respectively in the evaluation phase, securing 5th place on the leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T07:10:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.