Echoes in the Digital Abyss: Examining the Bubble Surrounding Security and Privacy Discourse in Social Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03940v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 17:10:47 GMT
• Title: Echoes in the Digital Abyss: Examining the Bubble Surrounding Security and Privacy Discourse in Social Networks
• Abstract summary: In-the-wild security and privacy discussions in social networks portray quite a different picture than in experimental settings.<n>Our findings indicate that the users generating or participating in security discussions largely already belong to highly clustered technology and security- and privacy-related interest communities.
• Score: 0.17499351967216337
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The dissemination of security and privacy education and guidance has been and still remains a challenge today. Social networks represent a potential avenue for sharing best practices, and experimentally they have been found to be effective at this task. While this appears promising, in the real world, security and privacy discussions would need to reach a wide range of people to be effective, avoiding the "interest bubbles" that commonly occur. We sought to understand how the communities surrounding security and privacy discourse operate, with a focus on what challenges need to be overcome to enable security and privacy discourse and advice to reach a wider audience. Indeed, we found that in-the-wild security and privacy discussions in social networks portray quite a different picture than in experimental settings. We built and analyzed the structure of a graph containing over 13 million users on the "X" platform (formerly "Twitter"), including 10,159 users who posted about security and privacy and their followers. Prior work has shown that users are more likely to consider information within social media if their like-minded social ties have visibly engaged with it. Our findings indicate that the users generating or participating in security discussions largely already belong to highly clustered technology and security- and privacy-related interest communities, which suggests that the people who are not already in the "inner circle" of relevant interests are likely not exposed effectively to these discussions. We conclude with reflections and ideas on increasing the reach of security and privacy guidance in social networks.

Related papers

• Understanding Users' Security and Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Towards Conversational AI Platforms [3.789219860006095]
  We conduct a large-scale analysis of over 2.5M user posts from the r/ChatGPT Reddit community to understand users' security and privacy concerns.<n>We find that users are concerned about each stage of the data lifecycle (i.e., collection, usage, and retention)<n>We provide recommendations for users, platforms, enterprises, and policymakers to enhance transparency, improve data controls, and increase user trust and adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T03:22:48Z)
• Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives [48.48294460952039]
  This survey offers comprehensive descriptions of the privacy, security, and fairness issues in federated learning. We contend that there exists a trade-off between privacy and fairness and between security and sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T10:31:45Z)
• The Illusion of Anonymity: Uncovering the Impact of User Actions on Privacy in Web3 Social Ecosystems [11.501563549824466]
  We investigate the nuanced dynamics between user engagement on Web3 social platforms and the consequent privacy concerns. We scrutinize the widespread phenomenon of fabricated activities, which encompasses the establishment of bogus accounts aimed at mimicking popularity. We highlight the urgent need for more stringent privacy measures and ethical protocols to navigate the complex web of social exchanges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T06:26:15Z)
• Privacy-preserving Optics for Enhancing Protection in Face De-identification [60.110274007388135]
  We propose a hardware-level face de-identification method to solve this vulnerability. We also propose an anonymization framework that generates a new face using the privacy-preserving image, face heatmap, and a reference face image from a public dataset as input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T19:28:04Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• Cross-Network Social User Embedding with Hybrid Differential Privacy Guarantees [81.6471440778355]
  We propose a Cross-network Social User Embedding framework, namely DP-CroSUE, to learn the comprehensive representations of users in a privacy-preserving way. In particular, for each heterogeneous social network, we first introduce a hybrid differential privacy notion to capture the variation of privacy expectations for heterogeneous data types. To further enhance user embeddings, a novel cross-network GCN embedding model is designed to transfer knowledge across networks through those aligned users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T06:22:37Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition with Learnable Privacy Budgets in Frequency Domain [77.8858706250075]
  This paper proposes a privacy-preserving face recognition method using differential privacy in the frequency domain. Our method performs very well with several classical face recognition test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T07:15:36Z)
• The Evolving Path of "the Right to Be Left Alone" - When Privacy Meets Technology [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel vision of the privacy ecosystem, introducing privacy dimensions, the related users' expectations, the privacy violations, and the changing factors. We believe that promising approaches to tackle the privacy challenges move in two directions: (i) identification of effective privacy metrics; and (ii) adoption of formal tools to design privacy-compliant applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T11:27:55Z)
• User Perception of Privacy with Ubiquitous Devices [5.33024001730262]
  This study aims to explore and discover various concerns related to perception of privacy in this era of ubiquitous technologies. Key themes like attitude towards privacy in public and private spaces, privacy awareness, consent seeking, dilemmas/confusions related to various technologies, impact of attitude and beliefs on individuals actions regarding how to protect oneself from invasion of privacy in both public and private spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T05:01:44Z)
• Applications of Differential Privacy in Social Network Analysis: A Survey [60.696428840516724]
  Differential privacy is effective in sharing information and preserving privacy with a strong guarantee. Social network analysis has been extensively adopted in many applications, opening a new arena for the application of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T19:06:03Z)
• Privacy Intelligence: A Survey on Image Privacy in Online Social Networks [20.778221889102866]
  Recent image leaks from popular OSN services and the abuse of personal photos have prompted the public to rethink individual privacy needs in OSN image sharing.<n>A more intelligent environment for privacy-friendly OSN image sharing is in demand.<n>We present a definition and a taxonomy of OSN image privacy, and a high-level privacy analysis framework based on the lifecycle of OSN image sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-27T15:52:16Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.