Evaluating Theory of Mind in Reasoning Models: Robustness over Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04646v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 10:05:53 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Theory of Mind in Reasoning Models: Robustness over Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance on Theory of Mind (ToM) tests.<n>We examine the behavior of such reasoning models in ToM tasks using novel adaptations of machine psychological experiments.
• Score: 0.26945563448932225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance on Theory of Mind (ToM) tests, prompting debate about the nature and validity of the underlying capabilities. At the same time, reasoning-oriented LLMs trained via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards have demonstrated notable improvements across a range of benchmarks. In this work, we examine the behavior of such reasoning models in ToM tasks using novel adaptations of machine psychological experiments together with results from established benchmarks. We observe that reasoning models consistently exhibit increased robustness to prompt variations and task perturbations. Our analysis suggests these gains come at least partly from models being more robust at reaching the correct answer under prompt and task variation. We read this as evidence for a robustness-based account rather than for a new ToM-specific ability.

Related papers

• AI4AI at Test-Time: Strong-to-Weak Capability Transfer via Harnesses [72.0777620499307]
  We study whether a stronger builder model can construct inference-time harnesses that help a weaker target model solve tasks more reliably without any parameter updates.<n> Empirically, this form of test-time capability transfer is highly effective, nearly doubling average target-model performance from 0.49 to 0.91.<n>We find that builder-model reasoning effort improves harness quality monotonically, platform effects are modest relative to the builder model's own capability, and weaker target models receive the largest gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T17:53:18Z)
• Understanding Artificial Theory of Mind: Perturbed Tasks and Reasoning in Large Language Models [10.629439705877054]
  We study whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit genuine Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities.<n>We introduce a handcrafted, richly annotated ToM dataset, including classic and perturbed false belief tasks.<n>We show a steep drop in ToM capabilities under task perturbation for all evaluated LLMs, questioning the notion of any robust form of ToM being present.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T16:24:35Z)
• To Think or Not To Think, That is The Question for Large Reasoning Models in Theory of Mind Tasks [56.11584171938381]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) assesses whether models can infer hidden mental states such as beliefs, desires, and intentions.<n>Recent progress in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) has boosted step-by-step inference in mathematics and coding.<n>We present a systematic study of nine advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) comparing reasoning models with non-reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T08:16:13Z)
• Identifying and Transferring Reasoning-Critical Neurons: Improving LLM Inference Reliability via Activation Steering [50.63386303357225]
  We propose AdaRAS, a lightweight test-time framework that improves reasoning reliability by selectively intervening on neuron activations.<n>AdaRAS identifies Reasoning-Critical Neurons (RCNs) via a polarity-aware mean-difference criterion and adaptively steers their activations during inference.<n> Experiments on 10 mathematics and coding benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements, including over 13% gains on AIME-24 and AIME-25.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T17:53:01Z)
• Reasoning Promotes Robustness in Theory of Mind Tasks [0.26945563448932225]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown strong performance on Theory of Mind (ToM) tests.<n>This paper examines the behavior of such reasoning models in ToM tasks using novel adaptations of machine psychological experiments and results from established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T16:01:24Z)
• Large Reasoning Models are not thinking straight: on the unreliability of thinking trajectories [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained via Reinforcement Learning (RL) have recently achieved impressive results on reasoning benchmarks.<n>Yet, growing evidence shows that these models often generate longer but ineffective chains of thought (CoTs)<n>We present new evidence of overthinking, where models disregard correct solutions even when explicitly provided, instead continuing to generate unnecessary reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T12:14:22Z)
• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• Leveraging Reasoning Model Answers to Enhance Non-Reasoning Model Capability [16.441081996257576]
  We propose leveraging reasoning-intensive models to improve less computationally demanding, non-reasoning models.<n>We demonstrate consistent improvements across various benchmarks, underscoring the potential of this approach for advancing the ability of models to answer questions directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T16:26:56Z)
• Brittle Minds, Fixable Activations: Understanding Belief Representations in Language Models [9.318796743761224]
  Despite growing interest in Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks for evaluating language models (LMs), little is known about how LMs internally represent mental states of self and others.<n>We present the first systematic investigation of belief representations in LMs by probing models across different scales, training regimens, and prompts.<n>Our experiments provide evidence that both model size and fine-tuning substantially improve LMs' internal representations of others' beliefs, which are structured - not mere by-products of spurious correlations - yet brittle to prompt variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T12:51:06Z)
• FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions [94.61530480991627]
  Theory of mind evaluations currently focus on testing models using passive narratives that inherently lack interactivity. We introduce FANToM, a new benchmark designed to stress-test ToM within information-asymmetric conversational contexts via question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T00:24:11Z)
• Question Decomposition Improves the Faithfulness of Model-Generated Reasoning [23.34325378824462]
  Large language models (LLMs) are difficult to verify the correctness and safety of their behavior. One approach is to prompt LLMs to externalize their reasoning, by having them generate step-by-step reasoning as they answer a question. This approach relies on the stated reasoning faithfully reflecting the model's actual reasoning, which is not always the case. Decomposition-based methods achieve strong performance on question-answering tasks, sometimes approaching that of CoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T00:54:10Z)
• Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models [82.50173296858377]
  Many anecdotal examples were used to suggest newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) We investigate the extent of LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:14:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.