Optimizing What Policies Learn From: Recoverability-aware Rollout Intervention Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05080v1
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:22:02 GMT
- Title: Optimizing What Policies Learn From: Recoverability-aware Rollout Intervention Learning
- Abstract summary: Critic-free group-based reinforcement learning has become a scalable approach for post-training large language models.<n>Recent work has started to treat rollout generation as an adaptive decision, but two important limitations remain.<n>We propose Recoverability-Aware Learning (RAIL), a training-time framework that learns how to generate rollouts based on the improvement produced by each intervention.
- Score: 21.808015281498076
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Critic-free group-based reinforcement learning has become a scalable approach for post-training large language models. However, most existing methods allocate the same number of rollouts to every task and trajectory state, even though some rollouts provide much more useful learning signals than others. Recent work has started to treat rollout generation as an adaptive decision, but two important limitations remain. First, intervention strategies are often based on fixed heuristics and therefore cannot adjust as the policy changes during training. Second, these methods usually decide only how many rollouts to generate, without explicitly controlling where and how to intervene. To address these limitations, we propose Recoverability-Aware Intervention Learning (RAIL), a training-time framework that learns how to generate rollouts based on the improvement produced by each intervention. RAIL models intervention selection as an online contextual-bandit problem and trains a recoverability controller using intervention traces collected through a shadow-to-live procedure. This allows the controller to keep learning while the underlying policy evolves. We evaluate RAIL in terms of effectiveness, adaptivity, expressiveness, and efficiency. Across multiple settings, RAIL consistently improves performance under limited rollout budgets. These results show that recoverability-aware intervention provides a principled way to generate more informative and less redundant rollouts, leading to stronger learning signals during post-training.
Related papers
- Large Language Model Post-Training: A Unified View of Off-Policy and On-Policy Learning [37.29007534251622]
Post-training has become central to turning pretrained large language models into aligned, capable, and deployable systems.<n>Recent progress spans supervised fine-tuning (SFT), preference optimization, reinforcement learning (RL), process supervision, verifier-guided methods, distillation, and multi-stage pipelines.<n>This survey argues that LLM post-training is best understood as structured intervention on model behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T08:00:37Z) - Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards [69.74686029941881]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose a unified neural scheduling framework that adaptively selects high-value rollouts throughout training.<n>Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in performance and training efficiency across multiple RLVR optimization methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T10:51:58Z) - Human-in-the-loop Online Rejection Sampling for Robotic Manipulation [55.99788088622936]
Hi-ORS stabilizes value estimation by filtering out negatively rewarded samples during online fine-tuning.<n>Hi-ORS fine-tunes a pi-base policy to master contact-rich manipulation in just 1.5 hours of real-world training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T11:53:08Z) - Adversarial Fine-tuning in Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning for Robust Robot Control [12.961180148172199]
This study introduces an offline-to-online framework that trains policies on clean data and then performs adversarial fine-tuning.<n>A performance-aware curriculum adjusts the perturbation probability during training via an exponential-moving-average signal.<n>Experiments on continuous-control locomotion tasks demonstrate that the proposed method consistently improves robustness over offline-only baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T09:45:24Z) - Diffusion Guidance Is a Controllable Policy Improvement Operator [98.11511661904618]
CFGRL is trained with the simplicity of supervised learning, yet can further improve on the policies in the data.<n>On offline RL tasks, we observe a reliable trend -- increased guidance weighting leads to increased performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T14:06:50Z) - Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: The Critic is Critical [5.916429671763282]
Off-policy reinforcement learning provides a promising approach for improving performance beyond supervised approaches.
We propose a best-of-both approach by first learning the behavior policy and critic with supervised learning, before improving with off-policy reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T09:16:38Z) - Offline Reinforcement Learning from Datasets with Structured Non-Stationarity [50.35634234137108]
Current Reinforcement Learning (RL) is often limited by the large amount of data needed to learn a successful policy.
We address a novel Offline RL problem setting in which, while collecting the dataset, the transition and reward functions gradually change between episodes but stay constant within each episode.
We propose a method based on Contrastive Predictive Coding that identifies this non-stationarity in the offline dataset, accounts for it when training a policy, and predicts it during evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T02:41:36Z) - Statistically Efficient Variance Reduction with Double Policy Estimation
for Off-Policy Evaluation in Sequence-Modeled Reinforcement Learning [53.97273491846883]
We propose DPE: an RL algorithm that blends offline sequence modeling and offline reinforcement learning with Double Policy Estimation.
We validate our method in multiple tasks of OpenAI Gym with D4RL benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T20:46:07Z) - Boosting Offline Reinforcement Learning via Data Rebalancing [104.3767045977716]
offline reinforcement learning (RL) is challenged by the distributional shift between learning policies and datasets.
We propose a simple yet effective method to boost offline RL algorithms based on the observation that resampling a dataset keeps the distribution support unchanged.
We dub our method ReD (Return-based Data Rebalance), which can be implemented with less than 10 lines of code change and adds negligible running time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-17T16:34:01Z) - Learning Routines for Effective Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
We propose a novel framework for reinforcement learning that effectively lifts such constraints.
Within our framework, agents learn effective behavior over a routine space.
We show that the resulting agents obtain relevant performance improvements while requiring fewer interactions with the environment per episode.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-05T18:41:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.