Exploring Dependence, Overreliance, and Addiction Related Behaviors Associated with Large Language Model Use Among Software Engineers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05561v1
• Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 03:27:57 GMT
• Title: Exploring Dependence, Overreliance, and Addiction Related Behaviors Associated with Large Language Model Use Among Software Engineers
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how software engineers experience the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) during professional software development.<n>The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis of participants' open-ended responses.
• Score: 1.8757823231879849
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has changed how software engineers perform everyday development activities. While these systems provide substantial support for tasks such as code generation, debugging, and documentation, their increasing integration into professional workflows has also raised questions regarding developers' reliance on these tools and the emergence of dependence, overreliance, and addiction-related behaviors. This study investigates how software engineers experience the use of LLMs during professional software development, with attention to behavioral patterns associated with dependence, overreliance, and addiction-related behaviors. An exploratory survey was conducted with 119 software practitioners. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis of participants' open-ended responses. Participants primarily described functional dependence, with LLMs becoming integrated into routine software engineering activities because of the productivity and efficiency they provide. Responses also suggested patterns consistent with overreliance, particularly through prioritizing LLMs over documentation or peer consultation while continuing to verify generated outputs. Reports associated with addiction-related behaviors were less common and primarily reflected difficulty moderating use or emotional attachment to the technology rather than impaired control. The findings suggest that LLMs are becoming a habitual component of professional software engineering practice. While most reported use appears functional, the results indicate the importance of promoting appropriate reliance by supporting trust calibration, professional judgment, and verification throughout software development.

Related papers

• Factors Impacting Developer Efficiency: Results from an Adaptive Longitudinal Study [0.8373057326694192]
  This study investigates the primary factors hindering the perceived efficiency of developers in a consulting and professional development context.<n>We conducted a mixed-methods longitudinal case study applying the Adaptive Developer Efficiency Monitoring Method (ADEMM) to 27 external software developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T13:53:03Z)
• AMATA: Adaptive Multi-Agent Trajectory Alignment for Knowledge-Intensive Question Answering [59.145044878490815]
  AMATA is an Adaptive Multi-Agent Trajectory Alignment framework.<n>It dynamically integrates external knowledge to improve response interpretability and factual grounding.<n>We introduce two principal innovations: (1) Intra-Trajectory Preference Learning, which learns objective-oriented preferences to prioritize critical agents, and (2) Inter-Agent Dependency Learning, which captures cross-agent tool dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T09:45:24Z)
• Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Software Engineering: Evidence from an Industry Survey [0.6660458629649825]
  This paper reports an empirical study of Large Language Models (LLMs) adoption in software engineering, based on a survey of 46 industry professionals.<n>Results reveal positive perceptions of LLMs, particularly regarding faster resolution of technical questions, improved documentation support, and enhanced source code standardization.<n> respondents also expressed concerns about cognitive dependence, security risks, and the potential erosion of technical autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:57:19Z)
• Model-Assisted and Human-Guided: Perceptions and Practices of Software Professionals Using LLMs for Coding [2.198430261120653]
  Large Language Models have quickly become a central component of modern software development.<n>This paper presents preliminary findings from a global survey of 131 software practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T06:59:56Z)
• Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories [17.975121612118752]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly employed to automate complex software engineering tasks.<n>We present a large-scale empirical study of the thought-action-result trajectories of three state-of-the-art LLM-based agents.<n>We identify key trajectory characteristics, such as counts and token consumption, recurring action sequences, and the semantic coherence of thoughts, actions, and their results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T16:34:52Z)
• ORMind: A Cognitive-Inspired End-to-End Reasoning Framework for Operations Research [56.961539386979354]
  We introduce ORMind, a cognitive-inspired framework that enhances optimization through counterfactual reasoning.<n>Our approach emulates human cognition, implementing an end-to-end workflow that transforms requirements into mathematical models and executable code.<n>It is currently being tested internally in Lenovo's AI Assistant, with plans to enhance optimization capabilities for both business and consumer customers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T05:11:21Z)
• Exploring Individual Factors in the Adoption of LLMs for Specific Software Engineering Tasks [17.818350887316004]
  This study explores the relationship between individual attributes related to technology adoption and Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The findings reveal that task-specific adoption is influenced by distinct factors, some of which negatively impact adoption when considered in isolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T13:07:04Z)
• Conversational AI as a Coding Assistant: Understanding Programmers' Interactions with and Expectations from Large Language Models for Coding [5.064404027153094]
  Conversational AI interfaces powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as coding assistants.<n>This study investigates programmers' usage patterns, perceptions, and interaction strategies when engaging with LLM-driven coding assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T15:06:07Z)
• Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
  AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions.<n>Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes.<n>We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z)
• Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
  We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.<n>MeCo quantifies metacognitive scores by capturing high-level cognitive signals in the representation space.<n>MeCo is fine-tuning-free and incurs minimal cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z)
• CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing [139.77117915309023]
  CRITIC allows large language models to validate and amend their own outputs in a manner similar to human interaction with tools. Comprehensive evaluations involving free-form question answering, mathematical program synthesis, and toxicity reduction demonstrate that CRITIC consistently enhances the performance of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T15:19:44Z)
• LLM-based Interaction for Content Generation: A Case Study on the Perception of Employees in an IT department [85.1523466539595]
  This paper presents a questionnaire survey to identify the intention to use generative tools by employees of an IT company. Our results indicate a rather average acceptability of generative tools, although the more useful the tool is perceived to be, the higher the intention seems to be. Our analyses suggest that the frequency of use of generative tools is likely to be a key factor in understanding how employees perceive these tools in the context of their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T15:35:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.