When Coordination Becomes a Threat: Communication Attacks in LLM-Controlled Multi-Robot Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06830v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 05:39:27 GMT
• Title: When Coordination Becomes a Threat: Communication Attacks in LLM-Controlled Multi-Robot Systems
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as high-level planners in embodied multi-robot systems.<n> communication risks in multi-robot collaboration remain insufficiently understood.
• Score: 45.96097597345022
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as high-level planners in embodied multi-robot systems, enabling robots to interpret natural language instructions and coordinate executable actions. Yet, this growing reliance on LLM planners also raises security concerns. Prior work has focused mainly on individual robots, while communication risks in multi-robot collaboration remain insufficiently understood. Existing multi-robot studies are further limited to preliminary analysis under the Decentralized Multi-agent System (DMAS) architecture, so it remains unclear whether these risks persist across other common communication architectures and how attacker access settings shape their propagation. To fill this gap, we formulate two communication attacks corresponding to distinct attacker access settings: the External Entry Point Attack and the Privileged In-System Attack. We evaluate both attacks across DMAS, HMAS-1, and HMAS-2 using three LLMs and five embodied multi-robot tasks. Results show that unsafe information can turn into unsafe actions across all three architectures: DMAS reaches a 96.7\% entry endorsement rate and a 100\% post endorsement activation rate, HMAS-1 reaches a 97.8\% unsafe action success rate, and HMAS-2 triggers 88.3\% of task defined unsafe action slots. To mitigate risks from trusted information flow, we introduce the Claim Provenance and Verification (CPV) Gate, which verifies communicated claims before downstream reuse and reduces the violation rate from 70.0\% to 36.6\%.

Related papers

• Modality-Decoupled Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Embodied Intelligence in 6G [90.42669277637026]
  Sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks are expected to provide a key infrastructure for large-scale embodied intelligence.<n>This article proposes FedMVLA, a modality-decoupled FL framework for privacy-preserving embodied intelligence in 6G networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T01:36:44Z)
• Agentic Harnesses: LLM-Driven Verification Layers for Robot Autonomy [0.0]
  Development of advanced AI systems has largely focused on execution rather than verifying the feasibility actions planning models propose.<n>We propose a LLM-driven verification layer between planning and execution to evaluate action permissibility.<n>We achieve near 85% precision across accept/escalate/reject categories of adversarial attacks, with negligible errors between accepting and rejecting tasks, and errors mostly manifesting at the escalate boundary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T17:15:55Z)
• Propagating Unsafe Actions in LLM Controlled Multi-Robot Collaboration via Single Robot Compromise [26.689718481370903]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as general planners in embodied intelligence.<n>We propose a novel attack paradigm for multi-robot system in which the adversary interacts with only a single entry robot.<n>We quantify this process with three metrics, obedience, infectiousness, and stealthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T05:45:52Z)
• Uncovering Linguistic Fragility in Vision-Language-Action Models via Diversity-Aware Red Teaming [64.48633529149579]
  We propose a novel framework to expose the vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models against linguistic variations.<n>Our method reduces the average task success rate from 93.33% to 5.85%, demonstrating a scalable approach to stress-testing VLA agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T08:43:36Z)
• From Prompt to Physical Action: Structured Backdoor Attacks on LLM-Mediated Robotic Control Systems [3.6185608572339962]
  Large language models (LLMs) are integrated into robotic control pipelines to translate user prompts into executable commands.<n>This digital-to-physical interface introduces a critical and underexplored vulnerability: structured backdoor attacks embedded during fine-tuning.<n>We experimentally investigate LoRA-based supply-chain backdoors in LLM-mediated ROS2 robotic control systems and evaluate their impact on physical robot execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T23:06:16Z)
• AdvEvo-MARL: Shaping Internalized Safety through Adversarial Co-Evolution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [78.5751183537704]
  AdvEvo-MARL is a co-evolutionary multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that internalizes safety into task agents.<n>Rather than relying on external guards, AdvEvo-MARL jointly optimize attackers and defenders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T02:06:30Z)
• Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms [1.03121181235382]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents face security vulnerabilities spanning AI-specific and traditional software domains.<n>This study bridges this gap through comparative evaluation of Function Calling architecture and Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployment paradigms.<n>We tested 3,250 attack scenarios across seven language models, evaluating simple, composed, and chained attacks targeting both AI-specific threats and software vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T18:24:28Z)
• Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Models [118.02118618146568]
  We study adversarial attacks on vision-language-action models (VLAs)<n>Our main algorithmic contribution is the adaptation and application of LLM jailbreaking attacks to obtain complete control authority.<n>This differs significantly from LLM jailbreaking literature, as attacks in the real world do not have to be semantically linked to notions of harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T19:43:58Z)
• X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agents [76.66287343106204]
  X-Teaming is a framework that explores how seemingly harmless interactions escalate into harmful outcomes and generates corresponding attack scenarios.<n>X-Teaming achieves a 96.2% attack success rate against the latest Claude 3.7 Sonnet model.<n>XGuard-Train is an open-source multi-turn safety training dataset that is 20x larger than the previous best resource.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T16:11:28Z)
• Can We Trust Embodied Agents? Exploring Backdoor Attacks against Embodied LLM-based Decision-Making Systems [27.316115171846953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant promise in real-world decision-making tasks for embodied AI.<n>LLMs are fine-tuned to leverage their inherent common sense and reasoning abilities while being tailored to specific applications.<n>This fine-tuning process introduces considerable safety and security vulnerabilities, especially in safety-critical cyber-physical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:59:43Z)
• On the Vulnerability of LLM/VLM-Controlled Robotics [54.57914943017522]
  We highlight vulnerabilities in robotic systems integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) due to input modality sensitivities.<n>Our results show that simple input perturbations reduce task execution success rates by 22.2% and 14.6% in two representative LLM/VLM-controlled robotic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:01:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.