Georeferencing Non-Gazetteered Place Names using Biological Specimen Records

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06884v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:15:38 GMT
• Title: Georeferencing Non-Gazetteered Place Names using Biological Specimen Records
• Abstract summary: We use digitised data from the Allan Herbarium (New Zealand) to identify non-gazetteer place names (NGPs)<n>These place names are historical, vernacular, or colloquial and were used as landmarks to describe a specimen's location at the time of collection.<n>We leverage repeated occurrences of the same place name across specimen records with different specimen locations and spatial relation terms to derive constraints on NGP locations.
• Score: 1.9911463513783276
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Biological specimen records collected by natural history institutions constitute a rich source of temporal geographic knowledge, capturing biodiversity information about regional landscapes as they were recorded at different times. Using digitised data from the Allan Herbarium (New Zealand), this study identifies place names in these specimen locality descriptions that are absent from current gazetteers; we refer to these as non-gazetteer place names (NGPs). These place names are typically historical, vernacular, or colloquial and were used as landmarks to describe a specimen's location at the time of collection. We then investigate the problem of georeferencing the NGPs using only the limited information available in the specimen records. To resolve this, we leverage repeated occurrences of the same place name across specimen records with different specimen locations and spatial relation terms, extracting and inverting these relations to derive constraints on NGP locations. This approach is instantiated within deterministic, probabilistic, and LLM-based methods, enabling a comparative analysis of their strengths and limitations for text-based spatial inference. On a pseudo-NGP benchmark, probabilistic inference achieves the highest accuracy (median error 1.43 km; A@1 km 36%), while the LLM yields competitive but less precise estimates (median error 1.80 km; A@1 km 31%), indicating that, despite advances in LLMs, traditional modelling remains advantageous when high spatial precision is required.

Related papers

• TEMPLAR Wales: A georeferenced environmental and toponymic dataset of Welsh settlements [0.0]
  TEMPLAR Wales is a georeferenced environmental-toponymy dataset comprising 3,757 settlement records across Wales.<n>The resource links a reproducible settlement frame to deterministic lexical screening and settlement-level environmental attributes.<n>It contains 1,350 lexical detections across 1,294 settlements, generated from a frozen registry of 24 Welsh place-name elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T11:14:57Z)
• Georeferencing complex relative locality descriptions with large language models [1.9911463513783276]
  This paper explores the potential of Large Language Models to georeference complex locality descriptions automatically.<n>We first identified effective prompting patterns, then fine-tuned an LLM using Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) on biodiversity datasets.<n>Our approach outperforms existing baselines with an average, across datasets, of 65% of records within a 10 km radius, for a fixed amount of training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T09:27:02Z)
• Geological Inference from Textual Data using Word Embeddings [0.0]
  This research explores the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to locate geological resources.<n>By using word embeddings trained with the GloVe model, we extract semantic relationships between target keywords and a corpus of geological texts.<n>For benchmarking, we calculate the proximity between the ten cities most semantically related to the target keyword and identified mine locations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T06:46:38Z)
• Feedforward Few-shot Species Range Estimation [61.60698161072356]
  Knowing where a particular species can or cannot be found on Earth is crucial for ecological research and conservation efforts.<n> accurate range estimates are only available for a relatively small proportion of all known species.<n>We outline a new approach for few-shot species range estimation to address the challenge of accurately estimating the range of a species from limited data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T19:13:29Z)
• Combining Observational Data and Language for Species Range Estimation [63.65684199946094]
  We propose a novel approach combining millions of citizen science species observations with textual descriptions from Wikipedia.<n>Our framework maps locations, species, and text descriptions into a common space, enabling zero-shot range estimation from textual descriptions.<n>Our approach also acts as a strong prior when combined with observational data, resulting in more accurate range estimation with less data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:22:55Z)
• Enhancing Worldwide Image Geolocation by Ensembling Satellite-Based Ground-Level Attribute Predictors [4.415977307120618]
  We examine the challenge of estimating the location of a single ground-level image in the absence of GPS or other location metadata. We introduce a novel metric, Recall vs Area, which measures the accuracy of estimated distributions of locations. We then examine an ensembling approach to global-scale image geolocation, which incorporates information from multiple sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T19:15:52Z)
• GeoLLM: Extracting Geospatial Knowledge from Large Language Models [49.20315582673223]
  We present GeoLLM, a novel method that can effectively extract geospatial knowledge from large language models. We demonstrate the utility of our approach across multiple tasks of central interest to the international community, including the measurement of population density and economic livelihoods. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are remarkably sample-efficient, rich in geospatial information, and robust across the globe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T00:03:23Z)
• Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mapping [72.92028508757281]
  Given a set of locations where a species has been observed, the goal is to build a model to predict whether the species is present or absent at any location. Traditional methods struggle to take advantage of emerging large-scale crowdsourced datasets. We use Spatial Implicit Neural Representations (SINRs) to jointly estimate the geographical range of 47k species simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T03:36:01Z)
• GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark [56.08664336835741]
  We propose a GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, named GeoGLUE. We collect data from open-released geographic resources and introduce six natural language understanding tasks. We pro vide evaluation experiments and analysis of general baselines, indicating the effectiveness and significance of the GeoGLUE benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T03:21:56Z)
• MGeo: Multi-Modal Geographic Pre-Training Method [49.78466122982627]
  We propose a novel query-POI matching method Multi-modal Geographic language model (MGeo) MGeo represents GC as a new modality and is able to fully extract multi-modal correlations for accurate query-POI matching. Our proposed multi-modal pre-training method can significantly improve the query-POI matching capability of generic PTMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T03:05:12Z)
• Geographic Spines in the 2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System [7.348066080730032]
  2020 Census Disclosure Avoidance System (DAS) is a formally private mechanism that adds independent noise to cross tabulations for a set of pre-specified hierarchical geographic units. This paper describes how the geographic spine used internally within DAS to define the initial noisy measurements impacts accuracy of the output database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T20:14:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.