Explanation Stability of Test-Time Adaptation in Computational Pathology: A Large-Scale Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07062v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 10:13:02 GMT
• Title: Explanation Stability of Test-Time Adaptation in Computational Pathology: A Large-Scale Benchmark
• Abstract summary: Test-time adaptation (TTA) has become a practical way to adapt deployed models to unlabeled target data.<n>Most TTA methods are evaluated by their effect on accuracy, but clinical use also depends on whether the model's explanations remain reliable after adaptation.<n>We study explanation stability under TTA across two histopathology benchmarks, Camelyon17 and NCT CRC-HE.
• Score: 9.401040751276776
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) has become a practical way to adapt deployed models to unlabeled target data, a setting that is especially relevant in computational pathology where staining, scanner, and cohort shifts are routine. While most TTA methods are evaluated by their effect on accuracy, clinical use also depends on whether the model's explanations remain reliable after adaptation. In this paper, we take a closer look at this largely unmeasured effect. We study explanation stability under TTA across two histopathology benchmarks, Camelyon17 and NCT CRC-HE, using five architectures ranging from convolutional networks to vision transformers and a pathology foundation model, seventeen TTA methods, and four attribution families. Across 2,958 adaptation runs, we observe a clear and systematic pattern: TTA methods differ sharply in how much they move model explanations, with frozen-backbone methods leaving attributions almost unchanged and continual methods such as CoTTA and RoTTA causing the largest drift. This effect is not uniform. Convolutional networks are substantially more sensitive than transformer and foundation-model backbones, and explanation drift increases with adaptation strength while remaining largely insensitive to batch size. Surprisingly, explanation stability is only weakly coupled to adaptation quality. Some methods preserve explanations almost perfectly while degrading calibration or accuracy, producing silent failures that would be missed by accuracy-only or explanation-only evaluation. These findings show that explanation stability is a distinct reliability axis for TTA in computational pathology. We release the metric, protocol, and full benchmark to support future work on adaptation methods that are not only accurate, but also stable and clinically auditable. Code: https://github.com/bahumanyarg11/tta-explanation-stability-pipeline

Related papers

• When Test-Time Adaptation Helps, Harms, or Becomes Inactive: A Condition-Level Study on CIFAR-10-C [0.0]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to improve model robustness under distribution shift by adapting a source model using unlabeled test data.<n>We present a comparison of three TTA strategies---BatchNorm-statistics adaptation (BN-Adapt), entropy-minimization adaptation (TENT), and reliability-statistics adaptation ( EATA)<n>All three methods improve mean accuracy over the source model by 12.2--13.3 percentage points (Wilcoxon signed-rank $p 10-12$)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T06:06:38Z)
• Multi-Hypothesis Test-Time Adaptation to Mitigate Underspecification [36.471308624288035]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) seeks to improve model robustness under distribution shifts by adapting parameters using unlabeled target data.<n>In the absence of supervision, entropy-based adaptation is fundamentally underconstrained: multiple distinct parameter updates can achieve similarly low entropy while inducing drastically different decision boundaries.<n>We reinterpret TTA through a posterior-inspired lens induced by entropy minimization, where low-entropy solutions define a pseudo-likelihood over parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T23:12:36Z)
• Test-Time Adaptation by Causal Trimming [25.388362454409833]
  Test-time adaptation aims to improve model robustness under distribution shifts.<n>We introduce Test-time Adaptation by Causal Trimming (TACT)<n>TACT applies data augmentations that preserve causal features while varying non-causal ones.<n>It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T08:22:38Z)
• Adapt in the Wild: Test-Time Entropy Minimization with Sharpness and Feature Regularization [85.50560211492898]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) may fail to improve or even harm the model performance when test data have mixed distribution shifts.<n>This is often a key obstacle preventing existing TTA methods from being deployed in the real world.<n>We propose a sharpness-aware and reliable entropy minimization method, called SAR, for stabilizing TTA from two aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T10:03:00Z)
• Persistent Test-time Adaptation in Recurring Testing Scenarios [12.024233973321756]
  Current test-time adaptation (TTA) approaches aim to adapt a machine learning model to environments that change continuously. Yet, it is unclear whether TTA methods can maintain their adaptability over prolonged periods. We propose persistent TTA (PeTTA) which senses when the model is diverging towards collapse and adjusts the adaptation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T02:24:44Z)
• Test-Time Adaptation Induces Stronger Accuracy and Agreement-on-the-Line [65.14099135546594]
  Recent test-time adaptation (TTA) methods drastically strengthen the ACL and AGL trends in models, even in shifts where models showed very weak correlations before. Our results show that by combining TTA with AGL-based estimation methods, we can estimate the OOD performance of models with high precision for a broader set of distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T23:21:25Z)
• Benchmarking Test-Time Adaptation against Distribution Shifts in Image Classification [77.0114672086012]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) is a technique aimed at enhancing the generalization performance of models by leveraging unlabeled samples solely during prediction. We present a benchmark that systematically evaluates 13 prominent TTA methods and their variants on five widely used image classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:59:53Z)
• On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptation [82.8392232222119]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising approach for tackling the robustness challenge under distribution shifts. We present TTAB, a test-time adaptation benchmark that encompasses ten state-of-the-art algorithms, a diverse array of distribution shifts, and two evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T09:35:29Z)
• Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World [60.98073673220025]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) has shown to be effective at tackling distribution shifts between training and testing data by adapting a given model on test samples. Online model updating of TTA may be unstable and this is often a key obstacle preventing existing TTA methods from being deployed in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T02:03:41Z)
• DLTTA: Dynamic Learning Rate for Test-time Adaptation on Cross-domain Medical Images [56.72015587067494]
  We propose a novel dynamic learning rate adjustment method for test-time adaptation, called DLTTA. Our method achieves effective and fast test-time adaptation with consistent performance improvement over current state-of-the-art test-time adaptation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T02:34:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.