Hit Selection Using SSMD-Based Machine Learning Performance Metrics in High-Throughput Screening Assays
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07609v1
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:33:48 GMT
- Title: Hit Selection Using SSMD-Based Machine Learning Performance Metrics in High-Throughput Screening Assays
- Abstract summary: We introduce a model-based framework that derives sensitivity, specificity, and area classification metrics from the strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD)<n>Unlike classical statistical power, which approaches 1 as sample size grows regardless of how small the true non-zero difference between group means is, the SSMD-derived sensitivity converges to a finite population value.<n>We demonstrate the utility of this framework in a hepatitis C virus primary screen comprising approximately 22,000 single-replicate measurements.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: High-throughput screening (HTS) assays are central to early-stage drug discovery but are often limited by extreme data sparsity, as primary screens typically use only a single replicate per test substance. This sparsity makes conventional machine-learning performance metrics, such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), difficult to estimate empirically because they require adequately sized labeled samples. Here, we introduce a model-based framework that derives these classification metrics from the strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD), a well-established HTS effect-size parameter. Under a Gaussian equal-variance assumption, we derive closed-form relationships linking SSMD to Youden-optimal sensitivity and specificity, and sensitivity at a preset specificity, yielding explicit estimators and exact confidence intervals from the noncentral t-distribution, even under single-replicate designs. Unlike classical statistical power, which approaches 1 as sample size grows regardless of how small the true non-zero difference between group means is, the SSMD-derived sensitivity converges to a finite population value that reflects the true degree of separation between two groups, making it a more meaningful and stable performance measure for hit selection. We demonstrate the utility of this framework in a hepatitis C virus primary siRNA screen comprising approximately 22,000 single-replicate measurements, showing that SSMD, AUROC, and sensitivity-based thresholds yield equivalent and interpretable hit sets. This work bridges classical HTS statistics and machine-learning evaluation theory, providing a statistically principled, reproducible way to estimate classification performance in ultra-low-replication screening workflows.
Related papers
- Towards Reliable AI-Based Histological Staining: A Systematic Study of Scaling and Uncertainty in Unpaired Generative Models [0.0]
Liver fibrosis, the principal predictor of long-term outcome in chronic liver disease, is staged from histological estimates of collagen content.<n>Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain generates standard quantitative readout (collagen area, CPA) but is not acquired at every clinical centre.<n> AI-based virtual staining can generate SR directly from H&E, yet systematic benchmarks of unsupervised models are scarce.<n>We benchmark six unsupervised image-to-image architectures (GAN-based and diffusion-based) across 54 scaling configurations on a newly released paired H&E to SR mouse liver dataset
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-25T14:41:57Z) - Compared to What? Baselines and Metrics for Counterfactual Prompting [39.56472929066589]
We observe prediction flip rates on MedQA of 14.9% when we surgically change patient gender.<n>We propose a framework in which we compare differences observed under target interventions to those induced by paraphrasing inputs.<n>We find that these effects largely dissipate when we account for general model sensitivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T19:23:33Z) - Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z) - Similarity-as-Evidence: Calibrating Overconfident VLMs for Interpretable and Label-Efficient Medical Active Learning [10.264467364282865]
Similarity-as-Evidence (SaE) calibrates text-image similarities by introducing a Similarity Evidence Head (SEH)<n>SaE attains state-of-the-art macro-averaged accuracy of 82.57% on medical imaging datasets with a 20% label budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-21T15:21:54Z) - Measuring Sample Quality with Copula Discrepancies [0.0]
Copula Discrepancy (CD) is a principled and computationally efficient diagnostic for dependence structure.<n>Our theoretical framework provides the first structure-aware diagnostic specifically designed for the era of approximate inference.<n>With computational overhead orders of magnitude lower than existing Stein discrepancies, the CD provides both immediate practical value for MCMC practitioners and a theoretical foundation for the next generation of structure-aware sample quality assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-29T02:11:45Z) - A Quad-Step Approach to Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning for Skin Cancer Classification [13.993637404760355]
Deep learning models have shown promise in automating skin cancer classification.<n>However, challenges remain due to data scarcity and limited uncertainty awareness.<n>This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of DL-based skin lesion classification on the HAM10000 dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T02:29:16Z) - Detecting Adversarial Data by Probing Multiple Perturbations Using
Expected Perturbation Score [62.54911162109439]
Adversarial detection aims to determine whether a given sample is an adversarial one based on the discrepancy between natural and adversarial distributions.
We propose a new statistic called expected perturbation score (EPS), which is essentially the expected score of a sample after various perturbations.
We develop EPS-based maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) as a metric to measure the discrepancy between the test sample and natural samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T13:14:58Z) - Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A
Variance-Reduction Perspective [51.70661197256033]
We propose ARCO, a semi-supervised contrastive learning framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation.
We first propose building ARCO through the concept of variance-reduced estimation and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks.
We experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T13:50:25Z) - Hierarchical Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning for
Contamination-Resistant Anomaly Detection [81.07346419422605]
Anomaly detection aims at identifying deviant samples from the normal data distribution.
Contrastive learning has provided a successful way to sample representation that enables effective discrimination on anomalies.
We propose a novel hierarchical semi-supervised contrastive learning framework, for contamination-resistant anomaly detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-24T18:49:26Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Deep Learning in current Neuroimaging: a multivariate approach with
power and type I error control but arguable generalization ability [0.158310730488265]
A non-parametric framework is proposed that estimates the statistical significance of classifications using deep learning architectures.
A label permutation test is proposed in both studies using cross-validation (CV) and resubstitution with upper bound correction (RUB) as validation methods.
We found in the permutation test that CV and RUB methods offer a false positive rate close to the significance level and an acceptable statistical power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T21:15:39Z) - Statistical control for spatio-temporal MEG/EEG source imaging with
desparsified multi-task Lasso [102.84915019938413]
Non-invasive techniques like magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) offer promise of non-invasive techniques.
The problem of source localization, or source imaging, poses however a high-dimensional statistical inference challenge.
We propose an ensemble of desparsified multi-task Lasso (ecd-MTLasso) to deal with this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-29T21:17:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.