The Replay Gap: Static Evaluation of Model Switching in LLM Agents Scores the Wrong World
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08239v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 17:07:11 GMT
- Title: The Replay Gap: Static Evaluation of Model Switching in LLM Agents Scores the Wrong World
- Abstract summary: LLM routers promise efficiency by matching each request to the cheapest adequate model, and are increasingly applied per step inside multi-step agents.<n>Yet agentic routers are evaluated like single-turn routers, by replaying logged trajectories and substituting another model's recorded outputs.<n>We test this assumption with branching rollouts: we fork live SWE-bench agent trajectories at controlled points, rebuild the environment, continue each fork with a different model, and compare against same-model control forks that isolate sampling and replay noise.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: LLM routers promise efficiency by matching each request to the cheapest adequate model, and are increasingly applied per step inside multi-step agents. Yet agentic routers are evaluated like single-turn routers: by replaying logged trajectories and substituting another model's recorded outputs, assuming the rest of the trajectory is unaffected. We test this assumption with branching rollouts: we fork live SWE-bench agent trajectories at controlled points, rebuild the environment, continue each fork with a different model, and compare against same-model control forks that isolate sampling and replay noise. Across six paired runs (~900 rollouts), swaps exceed their matched control floors by +0.25 to +0.66 normalized edit distance (multiplicity-corrected CIs exclude zero), rewriting 61-94% of post-fork actions; 74-77% of early swaps diverge at the first post-fork action, versus 6-35% of controls, leaving only 3% of replayed states valid. Divergence decreases with fork depth in both directions. All five outcome flips we observe occur in swap arms, upgrades rescuing unsolved instances and a downgrade losing the sole solve, and zero occur across 359 control forks. Scoring these same swaps with a log-stitching replay evaluator, replay mispredicts every success-relevant outcome call and predicts patches with 0.00-0.11 similarity to reality. Auditing the noise floor, temperature-0 "determinism" is configuration-dependent: FP8-served controls diverge on over 90% of forks while AWQ-served ones remain near-identical; and under tight budgets the stronger model more often exhausts its steps without submitting. Replay-based benchmarks score the wrong world for agentic routing; we release our harness and all trajectories.
Related papers
- ReDraft, Don't Just Distill: Reference-Driven Revision for Continual VLLM Post-Training [66.72708893922605]
Post-training of large multimodal models should add new capabilities while preserving those from pre-training.<n>SFT gives explicit target supervision that learns a task from near-zero accuracy, but its off-policy targets move the model far enough to cause forgetting.<n>We introduce ReDraft, which obtains both from the model's own failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T04:59:03Z) - DriftNet: A Dual-Head Trajectory Transformer for Detecting and Localizing Prompt Injection in LLM Agents [0.0]
An operator needs three facts: where the attack entered, which steps it corrupted, and whether apparent poison was resisted.<n>We present DriftNet, a dual-head trajectory Transformer that reads a logged tool-call trajectory and answers all three questions in one forward pass.<n>To our knowledge it is the first supervised detector to produce this joint output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-09T22:52:23Z) - Disagree to Explore, Agree to Commit: Routing-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Software Agents [60.650808962786364]
We study whether native MoE router traces can guide steering and selection without an external judge or selection-time test execution.<n>Our analysis shows that routing provides a robust behavioral role signal; token-granular readouts and decision-matched comparison sets turn it into effective control.<n>We evaluate on SWE-bench Verified using open-weight sparse MoE agents across scales and reasoning-effort settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T03:07:03Z) - Visual Grounding in Zero-Shot Vision-Language Control [0.0]
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as zero-shot controllers, but successful trajectories do not necessarily show that decisions are grounded in visual input.<n>We investigate this with an input-ablation battery: blind-image controls, repeated identical inputs, lane-axis reflection, non-visual baselines, and pipeline-integrity checks.<n>Across nine direct-action models, six structured local VLMs, and an exploratory VLM-MPC hierarchy, we analyse 32,874 scored calls over two embodiments and three simulators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T15:21:42Z) - A-SR: Self-Evolving Agentic LLMs for Symbolic Regression via Hierarchical Coordination [51.06539604709775]
We propose A-SR, a self-evolving agentic framework that shifts the control unit from expression edits to role-conditioned evidence views.<n>A-SR coordinates formula discovery through routing among coordination protocols, an online evaluator-reward role policy, and state-routed process memory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T14:01:10Z) - Reliability-Asymmetric Spacecraft Autonomy: Co-Designing a Capable Learned GNC Stack with a Verified, Adaptation-Aware Runtime Shield [2.28438857884398]
Rule-based autonomy is certifiable but brittle, while learned autonomy is capable but hard to verify.<n>We present AMPLE-GNC, a three-tier guidance, navigation, and control stack.<n>Fine-tuning a pretrained 360M model with grammar-constrained decoding gives a hard output-validity guarantee.<n>We show that a latching safe-hold shield can suppress even a capable controller.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-24T03:55:21Z) - Right Makes Might: Aligning Verified Hidden States Empowers RL Reasoning [55.264863369127774]
Current methods reduce each correct rollout to a single reward bit, ignoring the geometric structure shared among their hidden states.<n>We propose Hidden-Align, an auxiliary loss function that aligns the last-layer hidden states of correct rollouts at the anchor token during RL training, with zero overhead in both training and inference.<n>On eight mathematical reasoning benchmarks, Hidden-Align improves average pass@1 over the DAPO baseline by 3.8, 6.2, and 5.4 percentage points on Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 14B respectively, with consistent pass@k gains across all three scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T06:51:15Z) - CAX-Agent: A Lightweight Agent Harness for Reliable APDL Automation [7.355373109826612]
This paper presents the architecture of CAX-Agent, a lightweight agent harness for MAPDL automation.<n>We evaluate three recovery strategies (no_recovery, rule_only, and model_only) on 50 standard structural benchmarks.<n>Model_only achieves the best completion rate (0.9267), task score (3.59/4), total score (9.16/10), and zero-intervention rate (0.84), outperforming rule_only (0.7733, 3.17/4, 7.03/10, 0.00) and no_recovery (0.6933, 2.74/4, 5.60/10, 0.00) with large effect sizes
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T14:46:34Z) - TACT: Mitigating Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents via Activation Steering [70.99933391739154]
We focus on two recurring failure modes where the agent repeatedly reasons over information it already has, and where it issues tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence.<n>In this paper, we introduce TACT (Think-Act via activation Steering), to detect and mitigate agent drift in the residual stream before it surfaces as a behavioral failure.<n>In specific, we label trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated, and find that their hidden states can separate linearly along two *drift axes*, pointing from calibrated behavior toward each failure mode.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T10:24:27Z) - Beyond the Attention Stability Boundary: Agentic Self-Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols [6.357772907811544]
Self- Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols (SSRP) is a metacognitive framework that implements a discrete separation between architectural planning and procedural execution.<n>We present 3 experimental tiers: a shallow recency-based retrieval pilot, a high-entropy SOP, and a semantic hijacked 3-hop Multi-Fact Synthesis task.<n>Our results empirically locate the Attention Stability Boundary, where stateless Vanilla ReAct baselines for GPT 5.4 collapse to 0.1% success while SSRP achieves a 715X Resilience Lift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T14:13:30Z) - Claw-Eval: Toward Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents [66.97968363332465]
We introduce Claw-Eval, an end-to-end evaluation suite addressing all three gaps in agent benchmarks.<n>Claw-Eval comprises 300 human-verified tasks spanning 9 categories across three groups.<n>Every agent action is recorded through three independent evidence channels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T17:43:18Z) - CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z) - Ensemble Threshold Calibration for Stable Sensitivity Control [0.0]
We present an end-to-end framework that achieves exact recall with sub-percent variance over tens of millions of geometry pairs.<n>Our approach consistently hits a recall target within a small error, decreases redundant verifications relative to other calibrations, and runs end-to-end on a single TPU v3 core.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T15:22:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.