Not Worth Another Token: Marginal Value Estimation for Efficient Deep Research Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08389v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:56:37 GMT
• Title: Not Worth Another Token: Marginal Value Estimation for Efficient Deep Research Agents
• Abstract summary: We study marginal value estimation for context management in deep research agents.<n>We evaluate lightweight criteria and a learned value model at pre-retrieval, post-retrieval, and pre-synthesis stages.<n> Lightweights reduce token usage by up to 73% with little quality degradation, learned pruning remains competitive on selected trade-offs, and no single method dominates across quality, efficiency, and faithfulness.
• Score: 69.57766200248706
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Long-horizon research agents solve open-ended tasks through iterative retrieval, aggregation, and synthesis, but context grows rapidly while the marginal value of additional evidence often declines. This leads to unnecessary token cost, higher latency, and noisier inputs for final report generation. We study marginal value estimation for context management in deep research agents and present the first systematic stage-aware comparison of pruning strategies across the pipeline. We evaluate lightweight heuristic criteria and a learned value model at pre-retrieval, post-retrieval, and pre-synthesis stages. Our results show that pruning effectiveness depends more on where pruning is applied than on the specific scoring rule: early pruning yields the largest end-to-end savings, while later pruning mainly refines the final synthesis context. Lightweight heuristics reduce token usage by up to 73% with little quality degradation, learned pruning remains competitive on selected trade-offs, and no single method dominates across quality, efficiency, and faithfulness. These findings provide practical guidance for designing efficient long-horizon agentic systems.

Related papers

• Provably Reduced Sample Cost in Prior-Guided Hyperparameter Optimization [14.49729393385318]
  We provide the first distribution-dependent sample complexity bounds for multi-fidelity HPO with priors.<n>We show that informative priors concentrate probability mass on near-optimal arms, yield reductions in the number of required evaluations, whereas baseline performance is recovered with uninformative or misleading priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T13:32:17Z)
• Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental Design [55.998153710215654]
  We propose Active Residual Learning, a new paradigm that leverages the observational model as a foundational prior.<n>This approach shifts the experimental focus from learning target causal quantities from scratch to efficiently estimating the residuals required to correct observational bias.<n> Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks demonstrate that R-Design significantly outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T06:52:37Z)
• Search More, Think Less: Rethinking Long-Horizon Agentic Search for Efficiency and Generalization [64.61432234404276]
  emphSearch More, Think Less (SMTL) is a framework for long-horizon agentic search that targets both efficiency and generalization.<n>We train an end-to-end agent using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, achieving strong and often state of the art performance across benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T06:46:41Z)
• TRACE: Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation for Deep Research Agents [51.30998248590416]
  Trajectory-Aware Comprehensive Evaluation (TRACE) is a framework that holistically assesses the entire problem-solving trajectory.<n>Our contributions include the TRACE framework, its novel metrics, and the accompanying DeepResearch-Bench with controllable complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T13:28:57Z)
• On the Limits of Layer Pruning for Generative Reasoning in LLMs [0.5437050212139086]
  Layer pruning can compress large language models (LLMs) while retaining strong performance on classification benchmarks with little or no finetuning.<n>We find that tasks requiring multi-step reasoning are particularly sensitive to depth reduction.<n>Under realistic post-training constraints, we evaluate a simple mitigation strategy based on supervised finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T11:57:22Z)
• BEACON: Bayesian Optimal Stopping for Efficient LLM Sampling [12.126812175725654]
  We introduce BEACON, a principled adaptive sampling framework grounded in Sequential Search with Bayesian Learning.<n>We show that BEACON reduces average sampling by up to 80% while maintaining response quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T20:26:25Z)
• Beyond Memorization: Reasoning-Driven Synthesis as a Mitigation Strategy Against Benchmark Contamination [77.69093448529455]
  We present an empirical study using an infinitely scalable framework to synthesize research-level QA directly from arXiv papers.<n>We evaluate a lack of significant performance decay near knowledge cutoff dates for models of various sizes, developers, and release dates.<n>We hypothesize that the multi-step reasoning required by our synthesis pipeline offered additional complexity that goes deeper than shallow memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T16:41:37Z)
• Can We Afford The Perfect Prompt? Balancing Cost and Accuracy with the Economical Prompting Index [5.714609806192087]
  We present the Economical Prompting Index (EPI), a novel metric that combines accuracy scores with token consumption.<n>Our study examines 6 advanced prompting techniques, including Chain-of-Thought, Self-Consistency, and Tree of Thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T16:34:18Z)
• Progressive Skeletonization: Trimming more fat from a network at initialization [76.11947969140608]
  We propose an objective to find a skeletonized network with maximum connection sensitivity. We then propose two approximate procedures to maximize our objective. Our approach provides remarkably improved performance on higher pruning levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T11:32:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.