Unsure but Certain: Uncovering the Representation-Confidence Gap in Diffusion Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08791v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 16:13:46 GMT
• Title: Unsure but Certain: Uncovering the Representation-Confidence Gap in Diffusion Language Models
• Abstract summary: As accuracy drops due to noise, confidence stays near its maximum and the ability to correctly rank answers degrades toward random chance.<n>This ranking deficit favors standard models under noisy conditions and resists common remedies.<n>A lightweight extraction tool uses this signal to improve ranking.
• Score: 7.457366749109892
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Diffusion language models use broad context to create text, suggesting they might handle input noise better than standard models. Testing reveals this is only partially true. Internally, diffusion models detect text errors highly accurately. Externally, their reported certainty ignores this signal. As accuracy drops due to noise, confidence stays near its maximum and the ability to correctly rank answers degrades toward random chance. We call this mismatch the representation confidence gap. The visible concentration of high certainty scores is a misleading surface symptom. Standard math adjustments remove this concentration but fail to fix the underlying loss of ranking order. This ranking deficit favors standard models under noisy conditions and resists common remedies. Matching training recovers accuracy but not ranking, while score recalibration and input level error signals cannot reorder the final answers. However, the information needed to properly evaluate an answer survives in the hidden states. A lightweight extraction tool uses this signal to improve ranking. This approach is highly efficient because it leaves the base model completely frozen and requires zero additional text generation steps. We present this tool to prove the signal exists, while clearly noting its limits. Ultimately, certainty reliability is a more pressing limit than overall accuracy under noisy conditions.

Related papers

• On the Robustness of LLMs' Internal Representation of Code Correctness [0.3653697742557465]
  Research shows that models' own confidence signals are poorly calibrated with actual correctness.<n>Recent work captured an internal signal of code correctness that is able to judge candidate solutions better than the model's token-level or stated confidence.<n>We study this question systematically, varying how the signal is extracted from the model internals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T17:56:31Z)
• Sample-Adaptive Latent Rewards for Uncertainty-Guided Diffusion Post-Training [51.18425726646089]
  We propose textscSURE, a unified latent-space framework for image and video diffusion models.<n>It learns reward distributions and directly uses their reliability to guide dense post-training.<n>textscSURE-REFL achieves the highest VBench quality, semantic, and total scores among the evaluated methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T14:55:42Z)
• CaliDist: Calibrating Large Language Models via Behavioral Robustness to Distraction [51.56484100374058]
  Existing calibration methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook a critical dimension of trustworthiness: a model's behavioral robustness.<n>We introduce textscCaliDist, a novel post-hoc calibration approach that directly measures and penalizes a model's susceptibility to distraction.<n>textscCaliDist consistently achieves lower Expected Error (ECE) and Brier Score compared with strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T07:27:53Z)
• Learning Uncertainty from Sequential Internal Dispersion in Large Language Models [52.29267172760918]
  Uncertainty estimation is a promising approach to detect hallucinations in large language models.<n>Recent approaches commonly depend on model internal states to estimate uncertainty.<n>We present Sequential Internal Variance Representation (SIVR), a supervised hallucination detection framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T06:31:29Z)
• Decomposed Prompting Does Not Fix Knowledge Gaps, But Helps Models Say "I Don't Know" [47.930782177987446]
  Large language models often struggle to recognize their knowledge limits in closed-book question answering, leading to confident hallucinations.<n>We evaluate three task-equivalent prompting regimes: Direct, Assistive, and Incremental, across different model scales and multi-hop QA benchmarks.<n>Because factual knowledge is stable while hallucinations are agreement, cross-regime provides a precise signal of internal uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:39:58Z)
• When Safety Blocks Sense: Measuring Semantic Confusion in LLM Refusals [0.07777489763207261]
  Current evaluations mostly report global rates such as false rejection or compliance.<n>We introduce "semantic confusion," a failure mode that captures such local inconsistency.<n>We propose three model-agnostic metrics at the token level: Confusion Index, Confusion Rate, and Confusion Depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T19:11:45Z)
• CLUE: Non-parametric Verification from Experience via Hidden-State Clustering [64.50919789875233]
  We show that correctness of a solution is encoded as a geometrically separable signature within the trajectory of hidden activations.<n>ClUE consistently outperforms LLM-as-a-judge baselines and matches or exceeds modern confidence-based methods in reranking candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T02:14:33Z)
• Inference Scaling fLaws: The Limits of LLM Resampling with Imperfect Verifiers [13.823743787003787]
  Recent research has generated hope that inference scaling could allow weaker language models to match or exceed the accuracy of stronger models.<n>We show that no amount of inference scaling of weaker models can enable them to match the single-sample accuracy of a sufficiently strong model.<n>We also show that beyond accuracy, false positives may have other undesirable qualities, such as poor adherence to coding style conventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T15:13:06Z)
• Uncertainty in Language Models: Assessment through Rank-Calibration [65.10149293133846]
  Language Models (LMs) have shown promising performance in natural language generation. It is crucial to correctly quantify their uncertainty in responding to given inputs. We develop a novel and practical framework, termed $Rank$-$Calibration$, to assess uncertainty and confidence measures for LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T02:31:05Z)
• Shrinking Class Space for Enhanced Certainty in Semi-Supervised Learning [59.44422468242455]
  We propose a novel method dubbed ShrinkMatch to learn uncertain samples. For each uncertain sample, it adaptively seeks a shrunk class space, which merely contains the original top-1 class. We then impose a consistency regularization between a pair of strongly and weakly augmented samples in the shrunk space to strive for discriminative representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T14:05:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.