Subjective Multi-Bias Detection with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09126v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:05:12 GMT
• Title: Subjective Multi-Bias Detection with Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We delved into the pervasive challenge of bias detection within the text content.<n>The subjective bias can jeopardize the authenticity and reliability of texts.<n>We detected three different types of multi-span biases in corpus WIKIBIAS with more than 4,000 sentence pairs from Wikipedia edits.
• Score: 5.299719769828893
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this project, we delved into the pervasive challenge of bias detection within the text content. More specifically, our focus lies on the identification of subjective bias, a type of bias that introduces improper attitudes or portrays a statement at odds with the actual truth. The subjective bias can jeopardize the authenticity and reliability of texts, leading to misconceptions and potential social tensions, especially when expressed through offensive language. Following prior work [1], we tackled with three different types of subjective biases in text: (1) framing bias with the use of one-sided words or phrases containing a particular point of view; (2) epistemological bias which includes subtle linguistic features that can affect the believability of the texts; (3) demographic bias with word/phrase usage under presuppositions of a particular demographic factor (i.e., gender or religion). In terms of the data we utilize, the input consists of texts that may harbor subjective biases. The output is a classification or annotation that reveals the presence or absence of such biases within the provided content. More specifically, we detected three different types of multi-span biases in corpus WIKIBIAS [2] with more than 4,000 sentence pairs from Wikipedia edits. The data is labelled by bias type for span pairs with the following categories: (1) framing bias, (2) epistemological bias, (3) demographic bias, and (4) no bias. The project codes are released at https://github.com/HoningJade/LLM-Bias-Type-Classification.

Related papers

• GradBias: Unveiling Word Influence on Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Models [75.04426753720553]
  We propose a framework to identify, quantify, and explain biases in an open set setting. This pipeline leverages a Large Language Model (LLM) to propose biases starting from a set of captions. We show two variations of this framework: OpenBias and GradBias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T16:51:07Z)
• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Semantic Properties of cosine based bias scores for word embeddings [48.0753688775574]
  We propose requirements for bias scores to be considered meaningful for quantifying biases. We analyze cosine based scores from the literature with regard to these requirements. We underline these findings with experiments to show that the bias scores' limitations have an impact in the application case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:31:10Z)
• Discovering and Mitigating Visual Biases through Keyword Explanation [66.71792624377069]
  We propose the Bias-to-Text (B2T) framework, which interprets visual biases as keywords. B2T can identify known biases, such as gender bias in CelebA, background bias in Waterbirds, and distribution shifts in ImageNet-R/C. B2T uncovers novel biases in larger datasets, such as Dollar Street and ImageNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T13:58:46Z)
• Differential Bias: On the Perceptibility of Stance Imbalance in Argumentation [35.2494622378896]
  We ask whether an "absolute bias classification" is a promising goal at all. To decide whether a text has crossed the proverbial line between non-biased and biased is subjective. A prerequisite for this kind of bias model is the ability of humans to perceive relative bias differences in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T12:48:07Z)
• Challenges in Measuring Bias via Open-Ended Language Generation [1.5552869983952944]
  We analyze how specific choices of prompt sets, metrics, automatic tools and sampling strategies affect bias results. We provide recommendations for reporting biases in open-ended language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T19:57:15Z)
• The SAME score: Improved cosine based bias score for word embeddings [49.75878234192369]
  We introduce SAME, a novel bias score for semantic bias in embeddings. We show that SAME is capable of measuring semantic bias and identify potential causes for social bias in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T09:28:13Z)
• The Authors Matter: Understanding and Mitigating Implicit Bias in Deep Text Classification [36.361778457307636]
  Deep text classification models can produce biased outcomes for texts written by authors of certain demographic groups. In this paper, we first demonstrate that implicit bias exists in different text classification tasks for different demographic groups. We then build a learning-based interpretation method to deepen our knowledge of implicit bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T16:17:38Z)
• Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases [10.713568409205077]
  State-of-the-art neural language models generate dynamic word embeddings dependent on the context in which the word appears. We introduce the Contextualized Embedding Association Test (CEAT), that can summarize the magnitude of overall bias in neural language models. We develop two methods, Intersectional Bias Detection (IBD) and Emergent Intersectional Bias Detection (EIBD), to automatically identify the intersectional biases and emergent intersectional biases from static word embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T19:49:50Z)
• Towards Controllable Biases in Language Generation [87.89632038677912]
  We develop a method to induce societal biases in generated text when input prompts contain mentions of specific demographic groups. We analyze two scenarios: 1) inducing negative biases for one demographic and positive biases for another demographic, and 2) equalizing biases between demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T08:25:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.