Comparing British and American Audio Description of Movies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09792v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 16:14:10 GMT
• Title: Comparing British and American Audio Description of Movies
• Abstract summary: We compare audio description created in the United Kingdom against audio description created in the United States.<n>Results provide quantitative evidence to uphold all tested hypotheses.
• Score: 19.936257724469783
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Narrating the visual component of movies is known as audio description. It is a narrative technique designed to enable blind and visually impaired individuals to follow the story. However, it is far more constrained than most narratives: the descriptions not only need to convey the story in the movie, but they must also fit into gaps between dialogue and they need to conform to guidelines that exist in each region. In this work, we compare audio description created in the United Kingdom against audio description created in the United States. We use guidelines written for these two regions, alongside the impressions from a practitioner in the field, to motivate specific hypotheses about the differences. We test these hypotheses against our pre-existing corpus, which provides both human-authored American and British audio description for each of 206 movies. Results provide quantitative evidence to uphold all tested hypotheses, including differences in lexicon, the use of the progressive aspect, the use of passive constructions, the use of subjective adjectives and modifiers, when characters are named, how scenes are cued, and degree of overlap with movie dialogue and music. Our work offers a quantitative lens into the narrative technique of audio description.

Related papers

• REFRAMED: Towards Realistic Audio Description Generation for Movies [53.11641004249926]
  Audio Description (AD) is a verbal narration of key visual content in videos, enabling access for visually impaired audiences.<n>Existing approaches formulate AD generation in an artificial setting where both the content and timing of descriptions are pre-specified.<n>We introduce a new formulation of AD generation in which models must jointly decide what to describe and when to do it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T15:55:56Z)
• ADIFF: Explaining audio difference using natural language [31.963783032080993]
  This paper comprehensively studies the task of explaining audio differences and then propose benchmark, baselines for the task.<n>We present two new datasets for audio difference explanation derived from the AudioCaps and Clotho audio captioning datasets.<n>We propose ADIFF, which introduces a cross-projection module, position captioning, and a three-step training process to enhance the model's ability to produce detailed explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T20:00:43Z)
• Once More, With Feeling: Measuring Emotion of Acting Performances in Contemporary American Film [11.023300194166993]
  We apply speech emotion recognition models to a corpus of popular, contemporary American film. We find narrative structure, diachronic shifts, and genre- and dialogue-based constraints located in spoken performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T07:53:02Z)
• Character-aware audio-visual subtitling in context [58.95580154761008]
  This paper presents an improved framework for character-aware audio-visual subtitling in TV shows. Our approach integrates speech recognition, speaker diarisation, and character recognition, utilising both audio and visual cues. We validate the method on a dataset with 12 TV shows, demonstrating superior performance in speaker diarisation and character recognition accuracy compared to existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T20:27:34Z)
• Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? [114.34140090869175]
  This paper investigates the capability of LLMs in storytelling, focusing on narrative development and plot progression. We introduce a novel computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. We show that explicit integration of discourse features can enhance storytelling, as is demonstrated by over 40% improvement in neural storytelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:02:49Z)
• Movie101v2: Improved Movie Narration Benchmark [53.54176725112229]
  Automatic movie narration aims to generate video-aligned plot descriptions to assist visually impaired audiences. We introduce Movie101v2, a large-scale, bilingual dataset with enhanced data quality specifically designed for movie narration. Based on our new benchmark, we baseline a range of large vision-language models, including GPT-4V, and conduct an in-depth analysis of the challenges in narration generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-20T13:15:27Z)
• Select and Summarize: Scene Saliency for Movie Script Summarization [11.318175666743656]
  We introduce a scene saliency dataset that consists of human-annotated salient scenes for 100 movies. We propose a two-stage abstractive summarization approach which first identifies the salient scenes in script and then generates a summary using only those scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T16:16:53Z)
• Fine-grained Audible Video Description [61.81122862375985]
  We construct the first fine-grained audible video description benchmark (FAVDBench) For each video clip, we first provide a one-sentence summary of the video, followed by 4-6 sentences describing the visual details and 1-2 audio-related descriptions at the end. We demonstrate that employing fine-grained video descriptions can create more intricate videos than using captions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T22:03:48Z)
• On Negative Sampling for Audio-Visual Contrastive Learning from Movies [12.967364755951722]
  We study the efficacy of audio-visual self-supervised learning from uncurated long-form content i.e. movies. Our empirical findings suggest that, with certain modifications, training on uncurated long-form videos yields representations which transfer competitively with the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T20:36:13Z)
• Finding the Right Moment: Human-Assisted Trailer Creation via Task Composition [63.842627949509414]
  We focus on finding trailer moments in a movie, i.e., shots that could be potentially included in a trailer.<n>We model movies as graphs, where nodes are shots and edges denote semantic relations between them.<n>An unsupervised algorithm then traverses the graph and selects trailer moments from the movie that human judges prefer to ones selected by competitive supervised approaches.<n>Our tool allows users to select trailer shots in under 30 minutes that are superior to fully automatic methods and comparable to (exclusive) manual selection by experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T20:50:52Z)
• Paragraph-level Commonsense Transformers with Recurrent Memory [77.4133779538797]
  We train a discourse-aware model that incorporates paragraph-level information to generate coherent commonsense inferences from narratives. Our results show that PARA-COMET outperforms the sentence-level baselines, particularly in generating inferences that are both coherent and novel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T05:24:12Z)
• Exploring aspects of similarity between spoken personal narratives by disentangling them into narrative clause types [13.350982138577038]
  We introduce a corpus of real-world spoken personal narratives comprising 10,296 narrative clauses from 594 video transcripts. Second, we ask non-narrative experts to annotate those clauses under Labov's sociolinguistic model of personal narratives. Third, we train a classifier that reaches 84.7% F-score for the highest-agreed clauses. Our approach is intended to help inform machine learning methods aimed at studying or representing personal narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T14:34:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.