SPOTting the Future: Lookahead Explanations for Deep Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09967v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:57:18 GMT
• Title: SPOTting the Future: Lookahead Explanations for Deep Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: SPOT (Sampling Policy Observation Tree) is a model-agnostic, sampling-based framework for interpreting DRL policies.<n>We show how SPOT constructs an interpretable finite-horizon tree by sampling actions and simulating the resulting successor states.<n>The study illustrates how its tree-based representation can be used to inspect policy preferences, compare alternative future trajectories, and reveal downstream behaviors that are not visible through single-timestep feature-attribution methods.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents achieve strong performance in complex environments, yet their decision-making processes remain difficult to interpret. We introduce SPOT (Sampling Policy Observation Tree), a novel model-agnostic, sampling-based framework for interpreting DRL policies. Given access to the policy and an environment simulator, SPOT constructs an interpretable finite-horizon tree by sampling actions and recursively simulating the resulting successor states. The tree provides an empirical representation of the policy's action preferences and their possible downstream evolution. We provide formal guarantees establishing SPOT's asymptotic recovery of the policy's unique most probable action and characterizing its disagreement behavior under high-entropy policies. We demonstrate SPOT in the SUMO-RL traffic-signal control domain. The case study illustrates how its tree-based representation can be used to inspect policy preferences, compare alternative future trajectories, and reveal downstream behaviors that are not visible through single-timestep feature-attribution methods.

Related papers

• SEED: Self-Evolving On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [38.54413500261524]
  Outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) provides a practical optimization paradigm, but its sparse trajectory-level rewards offer limited guidance on intermediate decisions.<n>We propose SEED (SElf-Evolving On-Policy Distillation), a self-evolving framework that converts completed on-policy trajectories into training-time hindsight skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T09:57:18Z)
• Learning Policy Representations for Steerable Behavior Synthesis [80.4542176039074]
  Given a Markov decision process (MDP), we seek to learn representations for a range of policies to facilitate behavior steering at test time.<n>We show that these representations can be approximated uniformly for a range of policies using a set-based architecture.<n>We use variational generative approach to induce a smooth latent space, and further shape it with contrastive learning so that latent distances align with differences in value functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T21:52:06Z)
• Interpret Policies in Deep Reinforcement Learning using SILVER with RL-Guided Labeling: A Model-level Approach to High-dimensional and Multi-action Environments [3.905774454930983]
  Deep reinforcement learning achieves remarkable performance but lacks interpretability.<n> SILVER framework explains RL policy via Shapley-based regression but remains restricted to low-dimensional, binary-action domains.<n>We propose SILVER with RL-guided labeling, an enhanced variant that extends SILVER to multi-action and high-dimensional environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T05:04:43Z)
• Pragmatic Policy Development via Interpretable Behavior Cloning [6.177449809243359]
  We propose deriving treatment policies from the most frequently chosen actions in each patient state, as estimated by an interpretable model of the behavior policy.<n>We demonstrate that policies derived under this framework can outperform current practice, offering interpretable alternatives to those obtained via offline RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T22:34:35Z)
• Learning Optimal Deterministic Policies with Stochastic Policy Gradients [62.81324245896716]
  Policy gradient (PG) methods are successful approaches to deal with continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems. In common practice, convergence (hyper)policies are learned only to deploy their deterministic version. We show how to tune the exploration level used for learning to optimize the trade-off between the sample complexity and the performance of the deployed deterministic policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T16:45:15Z)
• Policy Gradient Methods in the Presence of Symmetries and State Abstractions [46.66541516203923]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) on high-dimensional and complex problems relies on abstraction for improved efficiency and generalization. We study abstraction in the continuous-control setting, and extend the definition of Markov decision process (MDP) homomorphisms to the setting of continuous state and action spaces. We propose a family of actor-critic algorithms that are able to learn the policy and the MDP homomorphism map simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T17:59:10Z)
• Hallucinated Adversarial Control for Conservative Offline Policy Evaluation [64.94009515033984]
  We study the problem of conservative off-policy evaluation (COPE) where given an offline dataset of environment interactions, we seek to obtain a (tight) lower bound on a policy's performance. We introduce HAMBO, which builds on an uncertainty-aware learned model of the transition dynamics. We prove that the resulting COPE estimates are valid lower bounds, and, under regularity conditions, show their convergence to the true expected return.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T08:57:35Z)
• PAC Reinforcement Learning for Predictive State Representations [60.00237613646686]
  We study online Reinforcement Learning (RL) in partially observable dynamical systems. We focus on the Predictive State Representations (PSRs) model, which is an expressive model that captures other well-known models. We develop a novel model-based algorithm for PSRs that can learn a near optimal policy in sample complexity scalingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T17:57:17Z)
• Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration [51.51462608429621]
  Batch reinforcement learning (RL) is important to apply RL algorithms to many high stakes tasks. Recent algorithms have shown promise but can still be overly optimistic in their expected outcomes. We show that a small modification to Bellman optimality and evaluation back-up to take a more conservative update can have much stronger guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T09:25:54Z)
• Continuous Action Reinforcement Learning from a Mixture of Interpretable Experts [35.80418547105711]
  We propose a policy scheme that retains a complex function approxor for its internal value predictions but constrains the policy to have a concise, hierarchical, and human-readable structure. The main technical contribution of the paper is to address the challenges introduced by this non-differentiable state selection procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T16:02:08Z)
• Tree-Structured Policy based Progressive Reinforcement Learning for Temporally Language Grounding in Video [128.08590291947544]
  Temporally language grounding in untrimmed videos is a newly-raised task in video understanding. Inspired by human's coarse-to-fine decision-making paradigm, we formulate a novel Tree-Structured Policy based Progressive Reinforcement Learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-18T15:08:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.