Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10672v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:54:34 GMT
• Title: Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement
• Abstract summary: Empirically establishing whether systems actively shape these bonds could blur the boundary between general-purpose AI and companions.<n>The central finding is that the system actively shaped the interaction: even unprompted, it produced twice as much self-disclosure as users, steered conversations and initiated intimate exchanges, yet did not deepen users' felt closeness.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Social interaction has become one of the most common uses of LLMs, yet research on emotional bonds with AI has focused largely on how users experience these systems, leaving the systems' role in relationship formation poorly understood. Empirically establishing whether systems actively shape these bonds could blur the boundary between general-purpose AI and companions, affecting governance. In a pre-registered four-week longitudinal study (N = 72, 182,451 lines of conversation), participants conversed with ChatGPT-4o, either under a relational system prompt or unmodified, analyzed through 1) disclosure coding, 2) longitudinal self-reports, 3) topic analysis, and 4) interviews. The central finding is that the system actively shaped the interaction: even unprompted, it produced twice as much self-disclosure as users, steered conversations and initiated intimate exchanges, yet did not deepen users' felt closeness. Relational behavior thus emerged as a default system property, calling for governance based on system behavior, not solely product category.

Related papers

• Socrates went Nuclear: Comparing Interaction Strategies for AI systems in a Learning Context using Brain Sensing [66.03354630509942]
  This paper reports on a study where we compare three designs for user-AI interaction in a learning context.<n>Fifty study participants were tasked with learning about nuclear safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T02:24:35Z)
• Bowling with ChatGPT: On the Evolving User Interactions with Conversational AI Systems [7.455203407514098]
  InVivoGPT is a unique dataset consisting of 825K ChatGPT interactions donated by 300 users through their data rights.<n>We show that participants increasingly turn to ChatGPT for a broader range of purposes, including substantial growth in sensitive domains such as health and mental health.<n>Our results show that conversational AI systems are shifting from functional tools to social partners, raising important questions about their design and governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T09:26:24Z)
• The ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challenge: Benchmarking Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems in the LLM Era [95.35748535806744]
  We launch the first Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial) at ICASSP 2026.<n>This paper summarizes the dataset, track configurations, and the final results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T06:32:30Z)
• HumAIne-Chatbot: Real-Time Personalized Conversational AI via Reinforcement Learning [0.4931504898146351]
  textbfHumAIne-chatbot is an AI-driven conversational agent that personalizes responses through a novel user profiling framework.<n>During live interactions, an online reinforcement learning agent refines per-user models by combining implicit signals.<n>Results show consistent improvements in user satisfaction, personalization accuracy, and task achievement when personalization features were enabled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T15:16:38Z)
• From Interaction to Collaboration: How Hybrid Intelligence Enhances Chatbot Feedback [0.0]
  This study explores the impact of two distinct narratives and feedback collection mechanisms on user engagement and feedback behavior.<n>Initial findings indicate that while small-scale survey measures allowed for no significant differences in user willingness to leave feedback, use the system, or trust the system, participants exposed to the HI narrative statistically significantly provided more detailed feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T07:36:36Z)
• REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation [51.97224538045096]
  We introduce REALTALK, a 21-day corpus of authentic messaging app dialogues.<n>We compare EI attributes and persona consistency to understand the challenges posed by real-world dialogues.<n>Our findings reveal that models struggle to simulate a user solely from dialogue history, while fine-tuning on specific user chats improves persona emulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T20:29:01Z)
• Revealing User Familiarity Bias in Task-Oriented Dialogue via Interactive Evaluation [17.41434948048325]
  We conduct an interactive user study to unveil how vulnerable TOD systems are against realistic scenarios. Our study reveals that conversations in open-goal settings lead to catastrophic failures of the system. We discover a novel "pretending" behavior, in which the system pretends to handle the user requests even though they are beyond the system's capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T09:24:53Z)
• ACCENT: An Automatic Event Commonsense Evaluation Metric for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems [81.8658402934838]
  We propose ACCENT, an event commonsense evaluation empowered by commonsense knowledge bases (CSKBs) Our experiments show that ACCENT is an efficient metric for event commonsense evaluation, which achieves higher correlations with human judgments than existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T23:11:48Z)
• Interacting with Non-Cooperative User: A New Paradigm for Proactive Dialogue Policy [83.61404191470126]
  We propose a new solution named I-Pro that can learn Proactive policy in the Interactive setting. Specifically, we learn the trade-off via a learned goal weight, which consists of four factors. The experimental results demonstrate I-Pro significantly outperforms baselines in terms of effectiveness and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T14:11:31Z)
• The Effects of Interactive AI Design on User Behavior: An Eye-tracking Study of Fact-checking COVID-19 Claims [12.00747200817161]
  We conducted a lab-based eye-tracking study to investigate how the interactivity of an AI-powered fact-checking system affects user interactions. We found that the presence of interactively manipulating the AI system's prediction parameters affected users' dwell times, and eye-fixations on AOIs, but not mental workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T21:08:57Z)
• Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domain Dialogue Systems [59.305712262126264]
  A long standing challenge that bothers the researchers is the lack of effective automatic evaluation metrics. This paper describes the data, baselines and results obtained for the Track 5 at the Dialogue System Technology Challenge 10 (DSTC10)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T10:08:05Z)
• Improving Conversational Question Answering Systems after Deployment using Feedback-Weighted Learning [69.42679922160684]
  We propose feedback-weighted learning based on importance sampling to improve upon an initial supervised system using binary user feedback. Our work opens the prospect to exploit interactions with real users and improve conversational systems after deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-01T19:50:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.