Revealing User Familiarity Bias in Task-Oriented Dialogue via Interactive Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13857v2
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:23:10 GMT
• Title: Revealing User Familiarity Bias in Task-Oriented Dialogue via Interactive Evaluation
• Authors: Takyoung Kim, Jamin Shin, Young-Ho Kim, Sanghwan Bae, Sungdong Kim,
• Abstract summary: We conduct an interactive user study to unveil how vulnerable TOD systems are against realistic scenarios. Our study reveals that conversations in open-goal settings lead to catastrophic failures of the system. We discover a novel "pretending" behavior, in which the system pretends to handle the user requests even though they are beyond the system's capabilities.
• Score: 17.41434948048325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Most task-oriented dialogue (TOD) benchmarks assume users that know exactly how to use the system by constraining the user behaviors within the system's capabilities via strict user goals, namely "user familiarity" bias. This data bias deepens when it combines with data-driven TOD systems, as it is impossible to fathom the effect of it with existing static evaluations. Hence, we conduct an interactive user study to unveil how vulnerable TOD systems are against realistic scenarios. In particular, we compare users with 1) detailed goal instructions that conform to the system boundaries (closed-goal) and 2) vague goal instructions that are often unsupported but realistic (open-goal). Our study reveals that conversations in open-goal settings lead to catastrophic failures of the system, in which 92% of the dialogues had significant issues. Moreover, we conduct a thorough analysis to identify distinctive features between the two settings through error annotation. From this, we discover a novel "pretending" behavior, in which the system pretends to handle the user requests even though they are beyond the system's capabilities. We discuss its characteristics and toxicity while showing recent large language models can also suffer from this behavior.

Related papers

• Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
  In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback. The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied. We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z)
• CAUSE: Counterfactual Assessment of User Satisfaction Estimation in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems [60.27663010453209]
  We leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate satisfaction-aware counterfactual dialogues. We gather human annotations to ensure the reliability of the generated samples. Our results shed light on the need for data augmentation approaches for user satisfaction estimation in TOD systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T23:45:31Z)
• Reliable LLM-based User Simulator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems [2.788542465279969]
  This paper introduces DAUS, a Domain-Aware User Simulator. We fine-tune DAUS on real examples of task-oriented dialogues. Results on two relevant benchmarks showcase significant improvements in terms of user goal fulfillment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T20:57:47Z)
• Interactive System-wise Anomaly Detection [66.3766756452743]
  Anomaly detection plays a fundamental role in various applications. It is challenging for existing methods to handle the scenarios where the instances are systems whose characteristics are not readily observed as data. We develop an end-to-end approach which includes an encoder-decoder module that learns system embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T02:20:24Z)
• A Transformer-Based User Satisfaction Prediction for Proactive Interaction Mechanism in DuerOS [12.060990859604681]
  We propose a proactive interaction mechanism where the system predicts the user satisfaction with the candidate response before giving it to the user. If the user is not likely to be satisfied according to the prediction, the system will ask the user a suitable question to determine the real intent of the user. We deploy and evaluate our model on DuerOS, and observe a 19% relative improvement on the accuracy of user satisfaction prediction and 2.3% relative improvement on user experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T09:17:49Z)
• Dialogue Evaluation with Offline Reinforcement Learning [2.580163308334609]
  Task-oriented dialogue systems aim to fulfill user goals through natural language interactions. They are ideally evaluated with human users, which is unattainable to do at every iteration of the development phase. We propose the use of offline reinforcement learning for dialogue evaluation based on a static corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T08:32:52Z)
• User Satisfaction Estimation with Sequential Dialogue Act Modeling in Goal-oriented Conversational Systems [65.88679683468143]
  We propose a novel framework, namely USDA, to incorporate the sequential dynamics of dialogue acts for predicting user satisfaction. USDA incorporates the sequential transitions of both content and act features in the dialogue to predict the user satisfaction. Experimental results on four benchmark goal-oriented dialogue datasets show that the proposed method substantially and consistently outperforms existing methods on USE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T02:50:07Z)
• Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Survey [133.93908165922804]
  We provide a systematic review of the techniques used in current conversational recommender systems (CRSs) We summarize the key challenges of developing CRSs into five directions. These research directions involve multiple research fields like information retrieval (IR), natural language processing (NLP), and human-computer interaction (HCI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-23T08:53:15Z)
• NUANCED: Natural Utterance Annotation for Nuanced Conversation with Estimated Distributions [36.00476428803116]
  In this work, we attempt to build a user-centric dialogue system. We first model the user preferences as estimated distributions over the system ontology and map the users' utterances to such distributions. We build a new dataset named NUANCED that focuses on such realistic settings for conversational recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T03:23:14Z)
• Optimizing Interactive Systems via Data-Driven Objectives [70.3578528542663]
  We propose an approach that infers the objective directly from observed user interactions. These inferences can be made regardless of prior knowledge and across different types of user behavior. We introduce Interactive System (ISO), a novel algorithm that uses these inferred objectives for optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T20:49:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.