Where To Look? : Causal Tracing of Vision Encoders in VLM

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10758v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:17:34 GMT
• Title: Where To Look? : Causal Tracing of Vision Encoders in VLM
• Abstract summary: Vision-language models can describe an image with remarkable accuracy, yet what visual information actually drives their answers?<n>We investigate this question through causal tracing, and we observe that highly causal vision tokens often lie outside the target region.<n>We further investigate: can these models preserve visual structure when appearance cues are removed? and find that visual cues are exploited to understand visual structures.
• Score: 0.6980863185266349
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models can describe an image with remarkable accuracy, yet a more fundamental question remains unanswered: what visual information actually drives their answers? In this work, we investigate this question through causal tracing, and we observe that highly causal vision tokens often lie outside the target region. Extending the analysis to larger vision-language models reveals a similar pattern across models and corruption settings, suggesting that strong multimodal performance does not necessarily imply spatially localized causal representations. We further investigate: can these models preserve visual structure when appearance cues are removed? and find that visual cues are exploited to understand visual structures. Together, our experiments expose a gap between seeing, using, and reasoning over visual structure, and provide a causal framework for studying how visual information is transformed, preserved, and ultimately used by modern vision-language models.

Related papers

• Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models [14.5102059776721]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance by integrating visual inputs with the rich priors of pretrained language models.<n>However, they often fail on vision-centric tasks, especially when visual evidence conflicts with pretrained knowledge.<n>We explore these failures using two diagnostic paradigms: (1) probing whether visual information is available, via image reconstruction, and (2) measuring multimodal context sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T22:52:34Z)
• Attention-Guided Saliency Maps for Interpreting Visualization Literacy in VLMs [4.507919939159203]
  We introduce a diagnostic saliency map method tailored for text generation over images using transformer models.<n>Our approach aggregates the language model's attention over the visual tokens across all heads and layers, then maps this attention back onto the vision encoder's patch grid to localise it over the image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T16:40:23Z)
• Diagnosing Visual Ignorance in Vision-Language Models [29.2851901986069]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently rely on language priors, producing confident answers that are weakly grounded in visual evidence.<n>In this work, we study language-prior reliance from both mechanistic and behavioral perspectives.<n>We find that language-prior reliance is a systematic routing failure affecting both model internals and benchmark validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T04:16:01Z)
• VisualScratchpad: Inference-time Visual Concepts Analysis in Vision Language Models [81.7389759509619]
  We introduce VisualScratchpad, an interactive interface for visual concept analysis during inference.<n>We apply sparse autoencoders to the vision encoder and link the resulting visual concepts to text tokens via text-to-image attention.<n>VisualScratchpad also provides a token-latent heatmap view that suggests a sufficient set of latents for effective concept ablation in causal analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T20:52:09Z)
• MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery [63.285794947638614]
  We develop MentisOculi, a suite of multi-step reasoning problems amenable to visual solution.<n> evaluating visual strategies ranging from latent tokens to explicit generated imagery, we find they generally fail to improve performance.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their inherent appeal, visual thoughts do not yet benefit model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:49:06Z)
• Attention Guided Alignment in Efficient Vision-Language Models [56.20286899428444]
  Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) rely on effective multimodal alignment between pre-trained vision encoders and Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of attention patterns in efficient VLMs.<n>We introduce Attention-Guided Efficient Vision-Language Models (AGE-VLM), a novel framework that enhances visual grounding through interleaved cross-attention layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T21:36:48Z)
• Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought in Real-World Driving Scenarios [69.00444996464662]
  We propose RIV-CoT, a Retrieval-Based Interleaved Visual Chain-of-Thought method that enables vision-language models to reason using visual crops corresponding to relevant entities.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that RIV-CoT improves answer accuracy by 3.1% and reasoning accuracy by 4.6% over vanilla CoT prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:31:16Z)
• Localization vs. Semantics: Visual Representations in Unimodal and Multimodal Models [57.08925810659545]
  We conduct a comparative analysis of the visual representations in existing vision-and-language models and vision-only models. Our empirical observations suggest that vision-and-language models are better at label prediction tasks. We hope our study sheds light on the role of language in visual learning, and serves as an empirical guide for various pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T05:00:18Z)
• Perceptual Grouping in Contrastive Vision-Language Models [59.1542019031645]
  We show how vision-language models are able to understand where objects reside within an image and group together visually related parts of the imagery. We propose a minimal set of modifications that results in models that uniquely learn both semantic and spatial information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:01:35Z)
• Object-Centric Diagnosis of Visual Reasoning [118.36750454795428]
  This paper presents a systematical object-centric diagnosis of visual reasoning on grounding and robustness. We develop a diagnostic model, namely Graph Reasoning Machine. Our model replaces purely symbolic visual representation with probabilistic scene graph and then applies teacher-forcing training for the visual reasoning module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T18:59:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.