TEAMMix: Taxonomy Enrichment Augmentation and Minority-augmented Mixing Strategy for LLM-enhanced Weak-Supervised Hierarchical Text Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11044v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:16:59 GMT
- Title: TEAMMix: Taxonomy Enrichment Augmentation and Minority-augmented Mixing Strategy for LLM-enhanced Weak-Supervised Hierarchical Text Classification
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a weakly supervised HTC framework enhanced by LLM-based data augmentation.<n>The framework first enriches the label hierarchy semantically through keyword generation and corpus mining, thereby enhancing the model's understanding of labels.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively improves the reliability of LLM-generated pseudo-labels and significantly enhances classification performance on fine-grained and imbalanced datasets.
- Score: 13.15177870043812
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Hierarchical Text Classification (HTC), as a critical text mining task, faces challenges such as complex label hierarchies and class imbalance. Existing methods based on large language models (LLMs) struggle to be efficiently applied to this task due to issues like lengthy prompts and loss of label structural information. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a weakly supervised HTC framework enhanced by LLM-based data augmentation. The framework first enriches the label hierarchy semantically through keyword generation and corpus mining, thereby enhancing the model's understanding of labels. Subsequently, it guides the LLM to generate pseudo-samples to mitigate the long-tail problem, and employs a Gaussian mixture model for confidence-based resampling to optimize the quality of generated data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively improves the reliability of LLM-generated pseudo-labels and significantly enhances classification performance on fine-grained and imbalanced datasets.
Related papers
- Fine-tuning MLLMs Without Forgetting Is Easier Than You Think [72.59321247529975]
We design a 2x2 experimental framework to assess model performance across in-distribution and out-of-distribution image and text inputs.<n>Our results show that appropriate regularization, such as constraining the number of trainable parameters or adopting a low learning rate, effectively prevents forgetting when dealing with out-of-distribution images.<n>We attribute this forgetting as task-specific overfitting and address this issue by introducing a data-hybrid training strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-15T17:16:19Z) - LLM-based Semantic Augmentation for Harmful Content Detection [5.954202581988127]
This paper introduces an approach that prompts large language models to clean noisy text and provide context-rich explanations.<n>We evaluate on the SemEval 2024 multi-label Persuasive Meme dataset and validate on the Google Jigsaw toxic comments and Facebook hateful memes datasets.<n>Our results reveal that zero-shot LLM classification underperforms on these high-context tasks compared to supervised models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T02:59:03Z) - Guiding LLMs to Generate High-Fidelity and High-Quality Counterfactual Explanations for Text Classification [2.899704155417792]
We introduce two simple classifier-guided approaches to support counterfactual generation by Large Language Models.<n>Despite their simplicity, our methods outperform state-of-the-art counterfactual generation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T14:15:07Z) - Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learning [65.23593936798662]
We show that fine-tuning with LLM-generated data improves target task performance and reduces non-target task degradation.<n>This is the first work to provide an empirical explanation based on token perplexity reduction to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in LLMs after fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T08:18:56Z) - Data Quality Enhancement on the Basis of Diversity with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Uncovered, Difficult, and Noisy [5.225010551503337]
This paper proposes a data quality enhancement (DQE) method for text classification based on large language models (LLMs)<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively enhances the performance of LLMs in text classification tasks.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance in several open-source classification tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-09T15:28:39Z) - Clustering Algorithms and RAG Enhancing Semi-Supervised Text Classification with Large LLMs [1.6575279044457722]
This paper proposes a Clustering, Labeling, then Augmenting framework that enhances performance in Semi-Supervised Text Classification tasks.<n>Unlike traditional SSTC approaches, this framework employs clustering to select representative "landmarks" for labeling.<n> Empirical results show that even in complex text document classification scenarios involving over 100 categories, our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracies of 95.41% on the Reuters dataset and 82.43% on the Web of Science dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-09T13:17:39Z) - Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse.<n>Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.<n>To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z) - Pseudo-label Refinement for Improving Self-Supervised Learning Systems [22.276126184466207]
Self-supervised learning systems use clustering-based pseudo-labels to provide supervision without the need for human annotations.
The noise in these pseudo-labels caused by the clustering methods poses a challenge to the learning process leading to degraded performance.
We propose a pseudo-label refinement algorithm to address this issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T07:47:59Z) - Bridging LLMs and KGs without Fine-Tuning: Intermediate Probing Meets Subgraph-Aware Entity Descriptions [49.36683223327633]
Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate extensive world knowledge and exhibit powerful context modeling capabilities.<n>We propose a novel framework that synergizes the strengths of LLMs with robust knowledge representation to enable effective and efficient KGC.<n>We achieve a 47% relative improvement over previous methods based on non-fine-tuned LLMs and, to our knowledge, are the first to achieve classification performance comparable to fine-tuned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T10:15:55Z) - DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity.
Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data.
Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z) - Revisiting LSTM Networks for Semi-Supervised Text Classification via
Mixed Objective Function [106.69643619725652]
We develop a training strategy that allows even a simple BiLSTM model, when trained with cross-entropy loss, to achieve competitive results.
We report state-of-the-art results for text classification task on several benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-08T21:55:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.