Exploring the Social Life of Data: Finding Data You Can Trust

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11395v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:01:19 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Social Life of Data: Finding Data You Can Trust
• Abstract summary: This paper explores how the social and empirical evidence that accumulates when data are used in research can be used to determine fit for purpose and trust.<n>A data-usage graph connects datasets to the publications, people, institutions, topics, software, models, and other datasets through which they are produced and used.<n>These connections reveal the it social life of data: who has relied on a source, for which questions, in what combinations, with which methods, and with what observable impact.
• Score: 7.469556526595981
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence is changing the scale and tempo of scientific inquiry. Models can now search, integrate, and reason over data far beyond data repositories familiar to any individual researcher. Yet this expansion creates a prior problem: before a model can produce a trustworthy scientific result, it must locate data that are appropriate for the question, sufficiently reliable for the intended analysis, and accompanied by enough context to support responsible interpretation. As data becomes increasingly abundant, the challenge of finding data has been overcome by the challenge of finding data that you can trust. This paper explores how the social and empirical evidence that accumulates when data are used in research can be used, analogous to social trust networks, to determine fit for purpose and trust. Specifically, the paper explores data-usage graphs as a new layer of scientific data infrastructure. A data-usage graph connects datasets to the publications, people, institutions, topics, software, models, workflows, and other datasets through which they are produced and used. These connections reveal the {\it social life of data:} who has relied on a source, for which questions, in what combinations, with which methods, and with what observable impact. They can turn scattered traces of practice into data-usage descriptors that complement conventional metadata and support judgments of trust and fitness for purpose. The central claim is not that popularity establishes trust, but that this can be grown with appropriate contextual history. Usage evidence must therefore be combined with production quality, provenance, governance, semantic clarity, and community validation. The feasibility and value of data usage graphs is demonstrated by implementing the prototype data insights discovery service within the National Data Platform (NDP).

Related papers

• Genuine Information Needs of Social Scientists Looking for Data [3.45796393492046]
  In the social sciences, data from surveys, interviews, polls, and statistics are primary resources for research.<n>There is a long tradition to collect and offer research data in data archives and online repositories.<n>Researchers use these systems to identify data relevant to their research.<n>However, especially in data search, users' complex information needs seem to collide with the capabilities of data search systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T08:47:47Z)
• How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy [52.00934156883483]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is a framework for reasoning about and limiting information leakage.<n>Differentially Private Synthetic data refers to synthetic data that preserves the overall trends of source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T21:14:39Z)
• A Datalake for Data-driven Social Science Research [2.285735909183272]
  We present a Datalake infrastructure tailored to the needs of interdisciplinary social science research.<n>Our system supports ingestion and integration of diverse data types, automatic provenance and version tracking, role-based access control, and built-in tools for visualization and analysis.<n>We argue that such infrastructure can democratize access to advanced data science practices, especially for NGOs, students, and grassroots organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T06:40:47Z)
• Enhancing Data Quality through Simple De-duplication: Navigating Responsible Computational Social Science Research [31.993279516471283]
  We conduct an in-depth examination of 20 datasets extensively used in NLP for Computational Social Science. Our analysis reveals that social media datasets exhibit varying levels of data duplication. Our findings suggest that data duplication has an impact on the current claims of state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:58:15Z)
• Data-Centric AI in the Age of Large Language Models [51.20451986068925]
  This position paper proposes a data-centric viewpoint of AI research, focusing on large language models (LLMs) We make the key observation that data is instrumental in the developmental (e.g., pretraining and fine-tuning) and inferential stages (e.g., in-context learning) of LLMs. We identify four specific scenarios centered around data, covering data-centric benchmarks and data curation, data attribution, knowledge transfer, and inference contextualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:34:07Z)
• Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data [83.63271573197026]
  The success of AI models relies on the availability of large, diverse, and high-quality datasets. Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution by generating artificial data that mimics real-world patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T06:34:17Z)
• On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms [56.119374302685934]
  There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development. We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Graph Machine Learning from Data to Computation: A Survey [67.7834898542701]
  We focus on reviewing privacy-preserving techniques of graph machine learning. We first review methods for generating privacy-preserving graph data. Then we describe methods for transmitting privacy-preserved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T04:30:23Z)
• Diverse Community Data for Benchmarking Data Privacy Algorithms [0.2999888908665658]
  The Collaborative Research Cycle (CRC) is a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) benchmarking program. Deidentification algorithms are vulnerable to the same bias and privacy issues that impact other data analytics and machine learning applications. This paper summarizes four CRC contributions on the relationship between diverse populations and challenges for equitable deidentification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T17:18:51Z)
• Beyond Privacy: Navigating the Opportunities and Challenges of Synthetic Data [91.52783572568214]
  Synthetic data may become a dominant force in the machine learning world, promising a future where datasets can be tailored to individual needs. We discuss which fundamental challenges the community needs to overcome for wider relevance and application of synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T16:38:40Z)
• Synthetic Data in Human Analysis: A Survey [16.562921709882865]
  Survey is intended for researchers and practitioners in the field of human analysis. We conduct a survey that summarises current state-of-the-art methods and the main benefits of using synthetic data. We also provide an overview of publicly available synthetic datasets and generation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T07:32:34Z)
• Measuring Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Genomic Data [3.635321290763711]
  We provide the first evaluation of the utility and the privacy protection of five state-of-the-art models for generating synthetic genomic data. Overall, there is no single approach for generating synthetic genomic data that performs well across the board.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T17:41:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.