Towards Understanding On-Policy Distillation through the Lens of Test-Time Scaling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11829v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 09:13:35 GMT
- Title: Towards Understanding On-Policy Distillation through the Lens of Test-Time Scaling
- Abstract summary: We show that OPD primarily improves sampling efficiency rather than consistently expanding the student's reasoning capability boundary.<n>The pass@K dynamics throughout OPD training further reveal a progressive shift toward stronger small-K performance at the expense of the large-K capability boundary.
- Score: 57.215936077456405
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as a promising post-training technique for enhancing LLM reasoning. It is commonly believed to enable the student model to distill knowledge from a stronger teacher model, thereby expanding capabilities beyond the pre-OPD base model. In this study, we examine this view through the lens of test-time scaling by varying the sampling budget K and evaluating performance with pass@K and avg@K. Specifically, across several OPD variants, we observe that OPD-trained models maintain superior avg@K performance across sampling budgets, while the advantage in pass@K gradually shifts to the pre-OPD base models as K increases. These results suggest that OPD primarily improves sampling efficiency rather than consistently expanding the student's reasoning capability boundary. The pass@K dynamics throughout OPD training further reveal a progressive shift toward stronger small-K performance at the expense of the large-K capability boundary. Furthermore, a problem-level solvability analysis using pass@1024 as the criterion reveals an asymmetry: OPD causes more previously solvable problems to become unsolvable than previously unsolvable problems to become solvable. Together, these findings suggest that, from the perspective of capability expansion, OPD behaves more like an "illusory distillation": its apparent gains arise primarily from improved sampling efficiency rather than from acquiring genuinely new reasoning capabilities from the teacher.
Related papers
- DreOPD: Degraded-Reference Extrapolative On-Policy Distillation for Flow-matching Models [11.299607850340607]
DreOPD is a Degraded-reference extrapolative OPD method for flow-matching models.<n>We show that DreOPD outperforms OPD and multi-task RL baselines in average performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T07:55:57Z) - Diagnosing and Mitigating Thinking Collapse in On-Policy Self-Distillation [21.932079347631632]
On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for enhancing and aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>OPSD paradoxically degrades downstream performance in complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose textbf Dual-Perspective OPSD (AD-OPSD), a robust control framework that dynamically moderates the self-distillation objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-12T15:24:25Z) - DiffusionOPD: A Unified Perspective of On-Policy Distillation in Diffusion Models [55.01951088768769]
DiffusionOPD is a new multi-task training paradigm for diffusion models based on Online Policy Distillation (OPD)<n>We show that DiffusionOPD consistently surpasses both multi-reward RL and cascade RL baselines in training efficiency and final performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T16:49:09Z) - Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards [73.44333771806282]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization (CIPO), a simple and effective extension to RLVR that converts on-policy failed trajectories into correction-oriented supervision.<n>CIPO improves learning effectiveness while explicitly enhancing the model's ability to correct its own errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T08:22:21Z) - On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z) - Stable On-Policy Distillation through Adaptive Target Reformulation [7.361248172930405]
Veto is an objective-level reformulation that constructs a geometric bridge in the logit space.<n>Veto consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning and existing on-policy baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T02:57:39Z) - CurES: From Gradient Analysis to Efficient Curriculum Learning for Reasoning LLMs [53.749193998004166]
Curriculum learning plays a crucial role in enhancing the training efficiency of large language models.<n>We propose CurES, an efficient training method that accelerates convergence and employs Bayesian posterior estimation to minimize computational overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T15:41:27Z) - Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models [50.84995206660551]
We introduce Conditional advANtage estimatiON (CANON) to amplify the impact of a target metric without presuming its direction.<n>CANON based on entropy consistently outperforms prior methods on both math reasoning and high-complexity logic tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T16:33:07Z) - Robustness-Reinforced Knowledge Distillation with Correlation Distance and Network Pruning [3.1423836318272773]
Knowledge distillation (KD) improves the performance of efficient and lightweight models.<n>Most existing KD techniques rely on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence.<n>We propose a Robustness-Reinforced Knowledge Distillation (R2KD) that leverages correlation distance and network pruning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T11:34:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.