Proactive Computing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12649v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 23:18:40 GMT
• Title: Proactive Computing
• Abstract summary: This survey distinguishes proactive computing from reactive, context-aware, adaptive, and predictive computing.<n>We discuss socio-technical issues involving user acceptance, trust, privacy, accountability, fairness, and sustainability.
• Score: 0.22018331015892134
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Computing systems are moving from reactive tools toward systems that sense, interpret, predict, and act before explicit user requests. This transition is enabled by the global scale of mobile connectivity, the rapid expansion of wearable and ambient sensing, advances in machine learning and foundation models, distributed edge infrastructure, and physical actuation. We define \emph{proactive computing} as a paradigm in which systems infer user context, anticipate future needs or risks, and initiate information delivery or actions at an appropriate time. This survey distinguishes proactive computing from reactive, context-aware, adaptive, and predictive computing, and frames proactivity as a system-level integration problem across sensing, understanding, decision making, action, and governance. We review the technological enablers of proactive computing, organize its design space, analyze technical challenges such as uncertainty-aware triggering and the prediction-to-action gap, and discuss socio-technical issues involving user acceptance, trust, privacy, accountability, fairness, and sustainability. We argue that the key research challenge is not merely improving prediction accuracy, but determining when, how, and whether systems should act on behalf of users.

Related papers

• Proactive Systems in HCI and AI: Concepts, Challenges, and Opportunities [21.556641782970335]
  The last few years have seen a significant rise in interest in highly autonomous and proactive systems, fueled by advances in AI.<n>The concept of proactivity remains loosely defined and inconsistently applied across research and practice.<n>This multidisciplinary workshop aims to establish a clearer and more rigorous foundation for understanding proactive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T20:30:58Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• From Physics to Machine Learning and Back: Part II - Learning and Observational Bias in PHM [52.64097278841485]
  Review examines how incorporating learning and observational biases through physics-informed modeling and data strategies can guide models toward physically consistent and reliable predictions.<n>Fast adaptation methods including meta-learning and few-shot learning are reviewed alongside domain generalization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:15:43Z)
• Statistical Inference for Responsiveness Verification [15.571656327462142]
  We introduce a formal validation procedure for the responsiveness of predictions with respect to interventions on their features.<n>We describe how to estimate responsiveness for the predictions of any model and any dataset using only black-box access.<n>We develop algorithms that construct these estimates by generating a uniform sample of reachable points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T21:50:08Z)
• Towards User-Centred Design of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Law Enforcement [1.1890528509539204]
  User requirements for AI-assisted systems in law enforcement remain unclear.<n>Participants in our study highlighted the need for a system capable of processing and analysing large volumes of data efficiently.<n>We argue that it is very unlikely that the system will ever achieve full automation due to the dynamic and complex nature of the law enforcement domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T09:25:29Z)
• Stream-Based Monitoring of Algorithmic Fairness [4.811789437743092]
  Stream-based monitoring is proposed as a solution for verifying the algorithmic fairness of decision and prediction systems at runtime.<n>We present a principled way to formalize algorithmic fairness over temporal data streams in the specification language RTLola.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T13:18:59Z)
• GUI Agents: A Survey [159.7656453000263]
  Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents, powered by Large Foundation Models, have emerged as a transformative approach to automating human-computer interaction.<n>Motivated by the growing interest and fundamental importance of GUI agents, we provide a comprehensive survey that categorizes their benchmarks, evaluation metrics, architectures, and training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T04:48:28Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.<n>It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.<n>We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)
• Multi Agent System for Machine Learning Under Uncertainty in Cyber Physical Manufacturing System [78.60415450507706]
  Recent advancements in predictive machine learning has led to its application in various use cases in manufacturing. Most research focused on maximising predictive accuracy without addressing the uncertainty associated with it. In this paper, we determine the sources of uncertainty in machine learning and establish the success criteria of a machine learning system to function well under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T10:28:05Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects [24.615500469071183]
  We focus on algorithmic recourse, which is concerned with providing explanations and recommendations to individuals who are unfavourably treated by automated decision-making systems. We perform an extensive literature review, and align the efforts of many authors by presenting unified definitions, formulations, and solutions to recourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:15:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.