DrEM: Dual-Side Robust Ensemble Ranking from Noisy User Preference Predictions in Video Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12778v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 03:36:09 GMT
• Title: DrEM: Dual-Side Robust Ensemble Ranking from Noisy User Preference Predictions in Video Recommendation
• Abstract summary: We propose a dual-side robust ensemble ranking framework called DrEM.<n>Our DrEM introduces a risk-denoising robust loss that corrects empirical risk using estimated preference flip probability.<n>It samples perturbations from the distribution of prediction noise and introduces a preference-preserving ranking consistency regularizer to improve feature-side output stability.
• Score: 12.507238526770687
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Industrial video recommendation systems typically adopt a multi-stage architecture. At the ensemble ranking stage, multi-dimensional user preference predictions (pxtrs) from an upstream multi-task model are fused into a unified ranking score to reflect user satisfaction. Since users' true satisfaction is difficult to observe directly, ensemble ranking models commonly use pxtrs both as input features and as a source for constructing proxy preferences. However, as outputs of an upstream prediction model, pxtrs inevitably contain prediction noise, which propagates to downstream learning across two sides. On the supervision side, noisy pxtrs may flip proxy preferences and introduce erroneous gradients. On the feature side, pxtr noise may propagate through model inputs and destabilize ranking scores. Existing ensemble ranking methods typically treat pxtrs as reliable signals and overlook such prediction noise. To address this, we propose DrEM, a dual-side robust ensemble ranking framework. Our DrEM introduces a risk-denoising robust loss that corrects the empirical risk using estimated preference flip probability. Meanwhile, it samples perturbations from the distribution of prediction noise and introduces a preference-preserving ranking consistency regularizer to improve feature-side output stability. Theoretically, we obtain an approximate distribution of the prediction noise and prove that the robust loss remains superior under flip probability estimation error. Extensive offline experiments and large-scale online A/B tests demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our DrEM.

Related papers

• Sample-Adaptive Latent Rewards for Uncertainty-Guided Diffusion Post-Training [51.18425726646089]
  We propose textscSURE, a unified latent-space framework for image and video diffusion models.<n>It learns reward distributions and directly uses their reliability to guide dense post-training.<n>textscSURE-REFL achieves the highest VBench quality, semantic, and total scores among the evaluated methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T14:55:42Z)
• Uncertainty as Remedy: Mitigating Satisfaction Label Bias in Short Video Multi-Objective Ensemble Ranking [16.64526329343913]
  This paper proposes UAME, an Uncertainty-Aware end-to-end Multi-objective Ensemble ranking framework for short video recommendation.<n>We show that UAME consistently improves two state-of-the-art paradigms, EMER and EASQ, and better aligns with questionnaire-based user satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-19T06:14:21Z)
• SATB-VR: Training Few-Step Video Restoration Diffusion Model using SNR-Aware Trajectory Blending [55.764018145256216]
  We present SATB-VR, a few-step paradigm that jump-starts the denoising process via an auxiliary predictor.<n>We show that SATB-VR performs favorably against existing approaches on synthetic, real-world, and AIGC benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-27T01:32:16Z)
• Beyond the Mean: Distribution-Aware Loss Functions for Bimodal Regression [13.50774354486614]
  We propose a family of distribution-aware loss functions integrating normalized RMSE with Wasserstein and Cramér distances.<n>Our framework strictly dominates MDNs in both fidelity and robustness, offering a reliable tool for aleatoric uncertainty estimation in trustworthy AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T18:37:05Z)
• One Sample is Enough to Make Conformal Prediction Robust [53.78604391939934]
  We show that conformal prediction attains some robustness even with a forward pass on a single randomly perturbed input.<n>Our approach returns robust sets with smaller average set size compared to SOTA methods which use many (e.g. around 100) passes per input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T19:14:25Z)
• Confidence Aware Learning for Reliable Face Anti-spoofing [52.23271636362843]
  We propose a Confidence Aware Face Anti-spoofing model, which is aware of its capability boundary.<n>We estimate its confidence during the prediction of each sample.<n>Experiments show that the proposed CA-FAS can effectively recognize samples with low prediction confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T14:29:02Z)
• Debiased Recommendation with Noisy Feedback [41.38490962524047]
  We study intersectional threats to the unbiased learning of the prediction model from data MNAR and OME in the collected data. First, we design OME-EIB, OME-IPS, and OME-DR estimators, which largely extend the existing estimators to combat OME in real-world recommendation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T23:42:18Z)
• Estimating Treatment Effects under Recommender Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approach [32.55211271796683]
  We show that commonly adopted difference-in-means estimators can lead to severely biased estimates due to recommender interference.<n>We propose a recommender choice model'' that explicitly represents the interference pathway.<n>We validate our method with a large-scale field experiment on Weixin short-video platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:53:26Z)
• Reconciling Model Multiplicity for Downstream Decision Making [24.335927243672952]
  We show that even when the two predictive models approximately agree on their individual predictions almost everywhere, it is still possible for their induced best-response actions to differ on a substantial portion of the population. We propose a framework that calibrates the predictive models with regard to both the downstream decision-making problem and the individual probability prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:36:46Z)
• Sample-Efficient Optimisation with Probabilistic Transformer Surrogates [66.98962321504085]
  This paper investigates the feasibility of employing state-of-the-art probabilistic transformers in Bayesian optimisation. We observe two drawbacks stemming from their training procedure and loss definition, hindering their direct deployment as proxies in black-box optimisation. We introduce two components: 1) a BO-tailored training prior supporting non-uniformly distributed points, and 2) a novel approximate posterior regulariser trading-off accuracy and input sensitivity to filter favourable stationary points for improved predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T11:13:17Z)
• Probabilistic and Variational Recommendation Denoising [56.879165033014026]
  Learning from implicit feedback is one of the most common cases in the application of recommender systems. We propose probabilistic and variational recommendation denoising for implicit feedback. We employ the proposed DPI and DVAE on four state-of-the-art recommendation models and conduct experiments on three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T08:59:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.