Numeracy in Large Language Models: Fundamental Limitations and Paths to Improvement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13129v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:01:58 GMT
• Title: Numeracy in Large Language Models: Fundamental Limitations and Paths to Improvement
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks yet remain unreliable on elementary numerical tasks.<n>This survey examines basic numerical understanding as a distinct from high-level mathematical reasoning.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks yet remain unreliable on elementary numerical tasks, including magnitude comparison, large-integer arithmetic, fractions, and scientific notation. This survey examines basic numerical understanding as a capability distinct from high-level mathematical reasoning. We propose the Numerical Grounding Framework (NGF), which decomposes numeracy into Representational Grounding (RG), mapping numeral forms to value, magnitude, and equivalent representations, and Procedural Grounding (PG), executing arithmetic operations in accordance with their mathematical definitions. Using NGF, we organize recent diagnostic benchmarks, failure modes, structural explanations, and mitigation strategies. We review evidence concerning tokenization, positional encoding, embedding geometry, and pretraining-data distribution. We also apply NGF in a coordinated evaluation of three frontier model families across Number Cookbook, NumericBench, and GSM-Symbolic, comparing atomic, contextual, and reasoning-assisted numeracy. Architectural interventions such as digit-aware tokenization and Abacus Embeddings can improve models trained from scratch but are generally unavailable to users of pretrained systems, for whom supervised fine-tuning, reasoning scaffolds, and external tools are more practical. We conclude with deployment recommendations and research directions for more reliable numerical behavior in foundation models.

Related papers

• What Really Improves Mathematical Reasoning: Structured Reasoning Signals Beyond Pure Code [72.9921566968371]
  We revisit the claim that code improves reasoning through controlled pretraining experiments on a 10T-token corpus with fine-grained domain separation.<n>Code substantially improves programming ability but does not act as a general reasoning enhancer.<n>Cross-domain structured reasoning traces, such as code-text and math-text mixtures, are better explained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T12:37:01Z)
• Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation [120.92237765735813]
  We build and release training data and benchmarks for deriving mathematical objects, the Principia suite.<n>We show how on-policy training can also be used to scale test-time compute via aggregation.<n>We find that strong LMs such as Qwen3-235B and o3 struggle on Principia, while our training recipes can bring significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T13:27:12Z)
• Systematic Diagnosis of Brittle Reasoning in Large Language Models [1.14219428942199]
  A central question in artificial intelligence is the extent to which machine learning models comprehend mathematics.<n>We propose a novel framework for measuring mathematical reasoning that moves beyond standard benchmarks to diagnose specific failure points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T21:40:09Z)
• Exposing Numeracy Gaps: A Benchmark to Evaluate Fundamental Numerical Abilities in Large Language Models [19.47343987998194]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing tasks.<n>Their performance on numerical reasoning tasks, such as basic arithmetic, numerical, and magnitude comparison, remains surprisingly poor.<n>Existing benchmarks primarily focus on linguistic competence or structured mathematical problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T10:48:28Z)
• Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges [0.0]
  We introduce GSM-Ranges, a dataset generator that systematically perturbs numerical values in math problems to assess model robustness across varying numerical scales.<n>We also propose a novel grading methodology that distinguishes between logical and non-logical errors, offering a more precise evaluation of reasoning processes beyond computational accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T09:53:10Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline.<n>Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood.<n>The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• TRIGO: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Proof Reduction for Generative Language Models [68.65075559137608]
  We propose TRIGO, an ATP benchmark that not only requires a model to reduce a trigonometric expression with step-by-step proofs but also evaluates a generative LM's reasoning ability on formulas. We gather trigonometric expressions and their reduced forms from the web, annotate the simplification process manually, and translate it into the Lean formal language system. We develop an automatic generator based on Lean-Gym to create dataset splits of varying difficulties and distributions in order to thoroughly analyze the model's generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T08:42:39Z)
• FERMAT: An Alternative to Accuracy for Numerical Reasoning [11.893004722079557]
  numerical reasoning is measured using a single score on existing datasets. We introduce a multi-view evaluation set for numerical reasoning in English, called FERMAT. FerMAT evaluates models on various key numerical reasoning aspects such as number understanding, mathematical operations, and training dependency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-27T15:00:45Z)
• NumGPT: Improving Numeracy Ability of Generative Pre-trained Models [59.931394234642816]
  We propose NumGPT, a generative pre-trained model that explicitly models the numerical properties of numbers in texts. Specifically, it leverages a prototype-based numeral embedding to encode the mantissa of the number and an individual embedding to encode the exponent of the number. A numeral-aware loss function is designed to integrate numerals into the pre-training objective of NumGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T15:06:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.