TRUE-Colon: Exposing a Consistent Transfer Asymmetry in Real-Time Polyp Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13711v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 19:13:54 GMT
• Title: TRUE-Colon: Exposing a Consistent Transfer Asymmetry in Real-Time Polyp Detection
• Abstract summary: Computer-aided detection systems for colonoscopy promise to reduce clinical miss rates, yet reliable real-world deployment remains elusive.<n>We establish a standardized benchmarking protocol that measures key deployment characteristics alongside localization accuracy.<n>We observe a consistent transfer asymmetry: models trained strictly on curated clips suffer a severe performance collapse when evaluated on full procedures.<n>We find that the Transformer detector attains the strongest sensitivity and the earliest, most persistent detections, while the convolutional detectors stay competitive at a higher throughput.
• Score: 5.961408803838967
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems for colonoscopy promise to reduce clinical miss rates, yet reliable real-world deployment remains elusive. This translational gap stems in part from a structural flaw in model development: the reliance on curated datasets that under-represent the long negative stretches and procedure-related artifacts characteristic of routine examinations. Training and evaluating architectures strictly on these lesion-centric benchmarks creates an illusion of success, since such benchmarks cannot capture clinically crucial metrics. To expose this gap, we establish TRUE-Colon, a standardized benchmarking protocol that measures key deployment characteristics alongside localization accuracy, and evaluate four real-time architectures (Faster R-CNN, YOLOv8, YOLOv11, RT-DETR) across curated benchmarks (SUN, PICCOLO) and 60 unedited, full-length procedures (REAL-Colon). We observe a consistent transfer asymmetry: models trained strictly on curated clips suffer a severe performance collapse when evaluated on full procedures, whereas procedure-trained models substantially improve rejection of non-polyp content on REAL-Colon, and largely retain their accuracy on curated benchmarks. Beyond transferability, we find that the Transformer detector attains the strongest sensitivity and the earliest, most persistent detections, while the convolutional detectors stay competitive at a higher throughput. Together, these results indicate that both training and benchmarking for deployable CADe should shift from curated, lesion-centric clips toward full-procedure data and deployment-relevant operating points. Source code is available at https://github.com/sdoerrich97/true-colon.

Related papers

• Actionable Hallucination Detection: Translating Latent Uncertainty into Agentic Critique [1.1172382217477128]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as AI agents frequently exhibit user specification-grounding failures.<n>Existing detection methods fail to provide actionable, real-time correction as they either do not localize the hallucinations, or incur prohibitive inference latency.<n>We introduce the Latent Critic, a lightweight low-rank adapter (LoRA) that operates concurrently with a frozen base LLM's generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T03:26:16Z)
• OOD-RL-Bench: A Benchmark Framework for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Reinforcement Learning [4.173831365316023]
  We present OOD-RL-Bench, a framework designed to evaluate OOD detectors against categories of anomalies injected into trajectories.<n> Detectors and anomaly injectors are integrated through shared interfaces and configuration.<n>We assess the performance of each detector across a suite of anomaly types using matched-time AUROC, matched-time AUPRC, matched-time false-positive rate, detection delay, and segmented-onset metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-14T08:57:04Z)
• From Signals to Transfer: A Factorised Study of Probe-Based Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models [51.470637128942336]
  We propose a factorised study of probe-based uncertainty estimation (UE) under matched conditions.<n>Our results show that raw hidden states and attention features are difficult to outperform in-domain.<n>We train benchmark-based pretrained probes that transfer reasonably well to open-ended factual generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T03:23:15Z)
• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• TimeLAVA: Learning-Agnostic Data Valuation for Time Series [48.76711740818533]
  TimeLAVA is a learning-agnostic framework that values temporal segments by their marginal contribution to minimize distributional discrepancy between evaluated and reference data.<n>We provide theoretical guarantees linking valuation to model-agnostic generalization and prove bounded sensitivity to contamination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T06:16:16Z)
• Disjoint or Overlapping? Inference Windowing for Reconstruction-Based Time Series Anomaly Detection [1.5439079597766574]
  We study the role of the inference stride, which controls whether subsequences are processed as disjoint windows or with overlap.<n>We propose a unified training, tuning, and multi-seed evaluation protocol on the curated TSB-AD benchmark.<n>We show that overlapping windows yield consistent improvements, with average relative gain up to +28%, and can alter method rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T19:42:30Z)
• Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals [83.0127582612634]
  Near-boundary Rescue (NSR) is a minimal, plug-and-play modification that retains out-of-bound tokens to recover lost signals.<n>NSR substantially improves training stability and delivers consistent gains over strong baselines such as DAPO and GSPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T16:45:31Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Scalably Enhancing the Clinical Validity of a Task Benchmark with Physician Oversight [5.202988483354374]
  In this work, we propose viewing benchmarks for complex tasks as ''in-progress living documents'' that should be periodically re-evaluated.<n>We introduce a systematic, physician-in-the-loop pipeline that leverages advanced agentic verifiers to audit and relabel MedCalc-Bench.<n>Our audit reveals that a notable fraction of original labels diverge from medical ground truth due to extraction errors, calculator logic mismatches, and clinical ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T18:59:34Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• Threshold-Consistent Margin Loss for Open-World Deep Metric Learning [42.03620337000911]
  Existing losses used in deep metric learning (DML) for image retrieval often lead to highly non-uniform intra-class and inter-class representation structures. Inconsistency often complicates the threshold selection process when deploying commercial image retrieval systems. We propose a novel variance-based metric called Operating-Point-Inconsistency-Score (OPIS) that quantifies the variance in the operating characteristics across classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T21:16:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.