Beyond Boundary Noise: Aggregated Aleatoric Uncertainty Fails to Capture Presence Ambiguity in 3D Lung Nodule Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14766v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:12:34 GMT
• Title: Beyond Boundary Noise: Aggregated Aleatoric Uncertainty Fails to Capture Presence Ambiguity in 3D Lung Nodule Segmentation
• Abstract summary: We systematically evaluate how well aleatoric uncertainty captures presence ambiguity in 3D lung segmentation.<n>We find that entropy-based uncertainty maps align with boundary noise but carry insufficient discriminative signal for presence ambiguity.<n>A lightweight supervised ambiguity head trained on frozen segmentation features substantially outperforms entropy-aggregation-based baselines.
• Score: 13.944682026264472
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty estimation is critical for the safe clinical deployment of deep learning in medical image segmentation, with aleatoric uncertainty theoretically designed to capture irreducible data ambiguity. However, whether entropy-based measures reflect clinically meaningful ambiguity, i.e. case-level disagreement about whether a pathology is present at all, remains poorly understood. Contrary to most prior work, which focused on pixel-wise boundary disagreement, we systematically evaluate how well aleatoric uncertainty captures presence ambiguity. Our evaluation spans 3D lung nodule segmentation across four architectures with Monte Carlo dropout and deep ensembles, on LIDC-IDRI and an external validation cohort (LNDb). We find that entropy-based uncertainty maps align with boundary noise and minor drawing variation but carry insufficient discriminative signal for presence ambiguity. In contrast, a lightweight supervised ambiguity head trained on frozen segmentation features substantially outperforms all entropy-aggregation-based baselines across architectures, metrics, and both cohorts, and matches or exceeds methods that explicitly model ambiguity under disagreement supervision (Probabilistic U-Net, Annotator-Confusion 3D-UNet). A qualitative feature-space analysis shows that presence ambiguity is already encoded in the frozen encoder features of pixel-wise-trained networks, only to be discarded by the segmentation output and its entropy aggregation. Our findings expose a fundamental mismatch between the theoretical promise of aleatoric uncertainty and its practical behavior, and suggest that practitioners should not rely on entropy-based uncertainty as a proxy for clinical ambiguity in safety-critical applications.

Related papers

• UCBound-Net: Uncertainty-Guided Boundary-Aware Continual Learning for Domain-Incremental Ultrasound Segmentation [0.0]
  We introduce UCBound-Net, a continual segmentation framework that exploits Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout uncertainty as a spatial proxy for forgetting risk.<n>Our method contributes three synergistic components: (i) uncertainty-weighted boundary distillation, which amplifies the knowledge transfer signal at high-entropy regions of the frozen teacher; (ii) uncertainty-calibration regularization, which explicitly penalizes overconfident erroneous predictions; and (iii) uncertainty-guided selection, a memory buffer that preferentially stores samples whose boundary regions exhibit the highest predictive entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T22:11:20Z)
• Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models in Medical Image Segmentation [5.9165058427687045]
  We propose QUAM-SM, a post-hoc framework using targeted adversarial search to identify "adrially fragile" pixels.<n>By actively seeking perturbations that expose predictive instability, our method highlights regions where decisions are most vulnerable to being flipped.<n>Experiments on two public datasets with multiple expert annotations demonstrate that QUAM-SM outperforms both standard and recent uncertainty estimation approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T09:42:24Z)
• Principle-Guided Supervision for Interpretable Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation [15.512833015785773]
  We develop a principle-guided uncertainty supervision framework (PriUS) based on evidential learning.<n>PriUS produces more consistent uncertainty estimates while maintaining competitive segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T05:17:20Z)
• UnGAP: Uncertainty-Guided Affine Prompting for Real-Time Crack Segmentation [16.902729686979303]
  Uncertainty-Prompted Feature Modulator (UPFM) treats aleatoric uncertainty as an active visual prompt rather than a mere output.<n>UnGAP balances superior segmentation accuracy with real-time inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T09:18:57Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Neural Uncertainty Principle: A Unified View of Adversarial Fragility and LLM Hallucination [60.197429875410286]
  Adversarial vulnerability in vision and hallucination in large language models are conventionally viewed as separate problems.<n>Formalizing a Neural Uncertainty Principle (NUP) under a loss-induced state, we find that in near-bound regimes, further compression must be accompanied by increased sensitivity dispersion.<n>In vision, masking highly coupled components improves robustness without costly adversarial training.<n>In language, the same prefill-stage probe detects hallucination risk before generating any answer tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T02:07:10Z)
• Volumetric Directional Diffusion: Anchoring Uncertainty Quantification in Anatomical Consensus for Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation [9.649916323072434]
  Volumetric Directional Diffusion (VDD) mathematically anchors the generative trajectory to a deterministic consensus prior.<n>VDD accurately explores the fine-grained geometric variations inherent in expert disagreements without risking topological collapse.<n>Ultimately, VDD provides clinicians with anatomically coherent uncertainty maps, enabling safer decision-making and mitigating risks in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T12:58:43Z)
• Semantic Energy: Detecting LLM Hallucination Beyond Entropy [106.92072182161712]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly deployed in real-world applications, but they remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>Uncertainty estimation is a feasible approach to detect such hallucinations.<n>We introduce Semantic Energy, a novel uncertainty estimation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T07:33:50Z)
• Inconsistency-aware Uncertainty Estimation for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation [92.9634065964963]
  We present a new semi-supervised segmentation model, namely, conservative-radical network (CoraNet) based on our uncertainty estimation and separate self-training strategy. Compared with the current state of the art, our CoraNet has demonstrated superior performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-17T08:49:33Z)
• Dive into Ambiguity: Latent Distribution Mining and Pairwise Uncertainty Estimation for Facial Expression Recognition [59.52434325897716]
  We propose a solution, named DMUE, to address the problem of annotation ambiguity from two perspectives. For the former, an auxiliary multi-branch learning framework is introduced to better mine and describe the latent distribution in the label space. For the latter, the pairwise relationship of semantic feature between instances are fully exploited to estimate the ambiguity extent in the instance space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T03:21:57Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.