Walk Before You Run: The Importance of Data Exploration for Data Analysis Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16045v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 03:19:59 GMT
• Title: Walk Before You Run: The Importance of Data Exploration for Data Analysis Agents
• Abstract summary: In current tools and benchmarks, this step is usually left implicit, creating a gap between downstream task performance and dataset understanding.<n>We show through downstream experiments that stronger Data Exploration support improves task performance.<n>Our results show that strong LLMs and data-analysis agents still miss important logical structure even when they read spreadsheet content.
• Score: 7.140798105546584
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: LLM-based data-analysis tools are increasingly used to help users analyze messy spreadsheets and workbooks, from answering questions over uploaded files to generating code, summaries, and visualizations. These systems are often evaluated by the correctness of their final downstream answers. However, reliable data analysis also depends on an earlier step: understanding what the dataset contains before solving the requested task. For complex workbooks, this Data Exploration step includes identifying the logical tables behind physical sheets, interpreting column semantics, recovering keys and relationships, and detecting quality issues. In current tools and benchmarks, this step is usually left implicit, creating a gap between downstream task performance and the dataset understanding needed for reliable, human-checkable analysis. Our key contribution is to identify this overlooked gap, make Data Exploration a first-class evaluation target, and show through downstream experiments that stronger Data Exploration support improves task performance. To evaluate dataset understanding directly, we introduce two benchmark settings: a real multi-sheet workbook benchmark based on a Vitamin D study dataset, and an extension of DSBench with schema-fixed Data Exploration artifacts. In both settings, systems are evaluated by the quality of a structured artifact capturing tables, columns, semantic roles, relationships, and profiling signals. Our results show that strong LLMs and data-analysis agents still miss important logical structure even when they read spreadsheet content. Furthermore, explicit Data Exploration support often improves downstream correctness, suggesting it should be treated as a first-class, inspectable stage in LLM data-analysis workflows and a natural human-in-the-loop checkpoint where domain experts can review and correct the artifact before downstream analysis proceeds.

Related papers

• Data Analysis in the Wild: Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Real-World Data Complexities [16.09389994769264]
  We introduce DataGovBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models in practical scenarios.<n> Comprehensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant performance gaps across both tasks.<n>DataGovBench provides a challenging benchmark for advancing research on LLMs capable of both answering analytical queries and discovering insights from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T16:43:05Z)
• Unsupervised Skill Discovery for Agentic Data Analysis [55.42853694128929]
  DataCOPE is an unsupervised verifier-guided skill discovery framework for data-analytic agents.<n>It iteratively coordinates a Data-Analytic Agent for trajectory generation, an Unsupervised Verifier for signal extraction, and a Skill Manager for contrastive skill distillation.<n>We evaluate DataCOPE on report-style analysis from Deep Data Research and reasoning-style analysis from DABStep.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T17:20:47Z)
• LLM-Enhanced Semantic Data Integration of Electronic Component Qualifications in the Aerospace Domain [4.161364556213409]
  This paper presents an experience in integrating and retrieving qualification data for electronic components used in satellite board design.<n>We propose a pipeline that uses Virtual Knowledge Graphs to enhance retrieval and reduce manual effort in data cleansing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T16:22:06Z)
• DataCross: A Unified Benchmark and Agent Framework for Cross-Modal Heterogeneous Data Analysis [8.171937411588015]
  We introduce DataCross, a novel benchmark and collaborative agent framework for unified, insight-driven analysis.<n>DataCrossBench comprises 200 end-to-end analysis tasks across finance, healthcare, and other domains.<n>We also propose the DataCrossAgent framework, inspired by the "divide-and-synthesis" workflow of human analysts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T08:40:45Z)
• Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
  Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z)
• LongDA: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Document Data Analysis [55.32211515932351]
  LongDA targets real-world settings in which navigating long documentation and complex data is the primary bottleneck.<n>LongTA is a tool-augmented agent framework that enables document access, retrieval, and code execution.<n>Our experiments reveal substantial performance gaps even among state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T23:23:16Z)
• LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Survey [54.08761322298559]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agent techniques have brought a fundamental shift in the functionality and development paradigm of data analysis tasks.<n>LLMs enable complex data understanding, natural language, semantic analysis functions, and autonomous pipeline orchestration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T17:31:38Z)
• IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis [60.32962597618861]
  IDA-Bench is a novel benchmark evaluating large language models in multi-round interactive scenarios.<n>Agent performance is judged by comparing its final numerical output to the human-derived baseline.<n>Even state-of-the-art coding agents (like Claude-3.7-thinking) succeed on 50% of the tasks, highlighting limitations not evident in single-turn tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:37:52Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents [9.60250892491588]
  Data quality issues, such as incomplete documentation, inaccurate labels, ethical concerns, and outdated information, remain common in widely used datasets.<n>With the surging ability of large language models (LLM), it's promising to streamline the discovery of hidden dataset issues with LLM agents.<n>In this work, we establish a benchmark to measure LLM agent's ability to tackle this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:02:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.