"If It Looks Like a User": Measuring Real-Time Moderation Effects via Social Media Simulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16601v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:58:51 GMT
• Title: "If It Looks Like a User": Measuring Real-Time Moderation Effects via Social Media Simulation
• Abstract summary: We develop a calibrated extension of SimSoM, an agent-based model of information diffusion on social networks.<n>We show that the calibrated model reproduces key statistical signatures of the empirical data.<n>We apply established misinformation-spreader detection and prevention methods to both empirical and simulated data.
• Score: 0.9134661726886931
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agent-based social media simulators offer a controlled environment to study content moderation, yet their value hinges on how faithfully they reproduce real platform dynamics. We develop a calibrated extension of SimSoM, an agent-based model of information diffusion on social networks, grounded in a real-world dataset of online vaccine discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach replaces ad-hoc parametrisations with empirically fitted distributions, optimised via CMA-ES (Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy) and validated against real data across temporal, distributional, and structural dimensions. Using this validated simulator, we provide three key contributions. First, we show that the calibrated model reproduces key statistical signatures of the empirical data, including activity distributions, post/reshare ratios, and temporal patterns. Second, we apply established misinformation-spreader detection and prevention methods to both empirical and simulated data, progressively removing top-ranked users and showing that the resulting decline in low-quality content is consistent across the two. Third, comparing static (retroactive) and dynamic (in-simulation) moderation across 30 network realisations, we show that static evaluation significantly overestimates the effectiveness of user bans for the most effective detectors: when moderation is applied in real time, compensatory resharing by the remaining users dampens the expected reduction in low-quality content, so static estimates should be read as an upper bound. These findings highlight the necessity of simulation-based evaluation for content moderation policies and contribute a reusable, empirically grounded simulation framework.

Related papers

• LiveSim: Simulating Environment-Shaped Users in Multi-Agent Live-Stream Ecosystems [53.47971344451318]
  We propose textbfLiveSim, an LLM-based framework for live-stream ecosystem simulation.<n>It represents users as editable behavioral hypotheses and progressively refines them through trajectory-grounded interactions.<n>Experiments on real-world live-stream risk-control data validate the effectiveness of LiveSim in improving user-level behavioral fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T09:16:29Z)
• ReactSim-Bench: Benchmarking Reactive Behavior World Model Simulation in Autonomous Driving [56.96697737229895]
  Reactive capability is a key property of data-driven behavior world model simulators for autonomous driving simulation systems.<n>We introduce ReactSim-Bench for evaluating the reactive capability of behavior world model simulation in autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T03:11:06Z)
• A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation [13.439555106885491]
  We study whether simulated evaluation preserves real-world conclusions in terms of policy ranking consistency, performance correlation, and perturbation-wise failure patterns.<n>This analysis allows us to characterize the limitations of existing simulators and identify what kinds of simulation signals are more aligned with real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T03:25:02Z)
• X4Val: Learning Neural Surrogates for Variance-Reduced Policy Evaluation [35.30872487399918]
  We introduce X4Val, a framework for variance-reduced real-world metric estimation in the presence of non-paired, multi-domain data.<n>X4Val embeds samples from real and auxiliary domains into a shared representation space and learns a transferable predictor of real-world metrics.<n>We provide theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations on autonomous driving and real-world robot manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:57:09Z)
• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Toward Visually Realistic Simulation: A Benchmark for Evaluating Robot Manipulation in Simulation [62.51953630639423]
  Existing benchmarks lack visual realism, creating a large domain gap between simulation and reality.<n>We propose VISER, a visually realistic benchmark for evaluating robot manipulation in simulation.<n>VISER features a high-fidelity dataset of over 1,000 3D assets with physically-based rendering (PBR) materials, along with 3D scenes created from these assets through curated layouts or generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T14:13:05Z)
• Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces [81.41397370235102]
  We introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data.<n>We show that current models struggle to accurately simulate complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand.<n>This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:26:21Z)
• SPACeR: Self-Play Anchoring with Centralized Reference Models [50.55045557371374]
  Sim agent policies are realistic, human-like, fast, and scalable in multi-agent settings.<n>Recent progress in imitation learning with large diffusion-based or tokenized models has shown that behaviors can be captured directly from human driving data.<n>We propose SPACeR, a framework that leverages a pretrained tokenized autoregressive motion model as a central reference policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T19:53:02Z)
• Crafting Imperceptible On-Manifold Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data [38.89245780759371]
  We propose a latent-space perturbation framework using a mixed-input Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to generate statistically consistent adversarial examples.<n>We show that our method achieves substantially lower outlier rates and more consistent performance compared to traditional input-space attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T05:34:44Z)
• A Conformal Approach to Feature-based Newsvendor under Model Misspecification [2.801095519296785]
  We propose a model-free and distribution-free framework inspired by conformal prediction.<n>We validate our framework using both simulated data and a real-world dataset from the Capital Bikeshare program in Washington, D.C.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T18:34:43Z)
• Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
  No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z)
• Investigating the Robustness of Counterfactual Learning to Rank Models: A Reproducibility Study [71.04084063541777]
  Counterfactual learning to rank has attracted extensive attention in the IR community.<n>Models can be theoretically unbiased when the user behavior assumption is correct and the propensity estimation is accurate.<n>Their effectiveness is usually empirically evaluated via simulation-based experiments due to a lack of widely available, large-scale, real click logs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:54:38Z)
• Model-based Policy Optimization with Unsupervised Model Adaptation [37.09948645461043]
  We investigate how to bridge the gap between real and simulated data due to inaccurate model estimation for better policy optimization. We propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework AMPO, which introduces unsupervised model adaptation. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of sample efficiency on a range of continuous control benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T14:19:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.