Variational Outlier-Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Generative Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16606v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:03:04 GMT
• Title: Variational Outlier-Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Generative Modeling
• Abstract summary: This article introduces a generative GPR model that captures observation-specific contamination and adaptively mitigates the influence of outliers.<n>Experiments on synthetic and real datasets under different contamination settings demonstrate that the proposed method remains competitive with-and in several cases outperforms-robust GPR baselines in prediction accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Outliers can substantially distort Gaussian process regression (GPR) due to its conventional Gaussian observation likelihood, leading to inaccurate model learning and prediction. To address this limitation, this article introduces a generative GPR model that captures observation-specific contamination and adaptively mitigates the influence of outliers. Subsequently, a variational generalized expectation-maximization procedure is used to learn the latent variables and GPR model parameters. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets under different contamination settings demonstrate that the proposed method remains competitive with-and in several cases outperforms-robust GPR baselines in prediction accuracy. Moreover, the proposed method shares the cubic computational scaling of the compared GPR methods.

Related papers

• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Self-Boost via Optimal Retraining: An Analysis via Approximate Message Passing [58.52119063742121]
  Retraining a model using its own predictions together with the original, potentially noisy labels is a well-known strategy for improving the model performance.<n>This paper addresses the question of how to optimally combine the model's predictions and the provided labels.<n>Our main contribution is the derivation of the Bayes optimal aggregator function to combine the current model's predictions and the given labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T07:16:44Z)
• Polynomial Chaos Expanded Gaussian Process [2.287415292857564]
  In complex and unknown processes, global models are initially generated over the entire experimental space but often fail to provide accurate predictions in local areas.<n>A common approach is to use local models, which requires the experimental space and training multiple models, adding significant complexity.<n>This study addresses the need for models that effectively represent both global and local experimental spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T07:11:05Z)
• Sparse Variational Contaminated Noise Gaussian Process Regression with Applications in Geomagnetic Perturbations Forecasting [4.675221539472143]
  We propose a scalable inference algorithm for fitting sparse Gaussian process regression models with contaminated normal noise on large datasets. We show that our approach yields shorter prediction intervals for similar coverage and accuracy when compared to an artificial dense neural network baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T15:08:57Z)
• Conformal Approach To Gaussian Process Surrogate Evaluation With Coverage Guarantees [47.22930583160043]
  We propose a method for building adaptive cross-conformal prediction intervals. The resulting conformal prediction intervals exhibit a level of adaptivity akin to Bayesian credibility sets. The potential applicability of the method is demonstrated in the context of surrogate modeling of an expensive-to-evaluate simulator of the clogging phenomenon in steam generators of nuclear reactors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T14:45:18Z)
• Model-Based Reparameterization Policy Gradient Methods: Theory and Practical Algorithms [88.74308282658133]
  Reization (RP) Policy Gradient Methods (PGMs) have been widely adopted for continuous control tasks in robotics and computer graphics. Recent studies have revealed that, when applied to long-term reinforcement learning problems, model-based RP PGMs may experience chaotic and non-smooth optimization landscapes. We propose a spectral normalization method to mitigate the exploding variance issue caused by long model unrolls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T18:43:21Z)
• Quantifying predictive uncertainty of aphasia severity in stroke patients with sparse heteroscedastic Bayesian high-dimensional regression [47.1405366895538]
  Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. This paper proposes estimating high-dimensional heteroscedastic linear regression models using a heteroscedastic partitioned empirical Bayes Expectation Conditional Maximization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T22:06:29Z)
• Self-Distillation for Gaussian Process Regression and Classification [0.0]
  We propose two approaches to extend the notion of knowledge distillation to Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Gaussian Process Classification (GPC) The data-centric approach resembles most current distillation techniques for machine learning, and refits a model on deterministic predictions from the teacher. The distribution-centric approach re-uses the full probabilistic posterior for the next iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T17:59:20Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Generalised Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models (GPLVM) with Stochastic Variational Inference [9.468270453795409]
  We study the doubly formulation of the BayesianVM model amenable with minibatch training. We show how this framework is compatible with different latent variable formulations and perform experiments to compare a suite of models. We demonstrate how we can train in the presence of massively missing data and obtain high-fidelity reconstructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T21:21:51Z)
• On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGD [78.0918823643911]
  We study properties of random features (RF) regression in high dimensions optimized by gradient descent (SGD) We derive precise non-asymptotic error bounds of RF regression under both constant and adaptive step-size SGD setting. We observe the double descent phenomenon both theoretically and empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T17:47:39Z)
• Gaussian Process Regression with Local Explanation [28.90948136731314]
  We propose GPR with local explanation, which reveals the feature contributions to the prediction of each sample. In the proposed model, both the prediction and explanation for each sample are performed using an easy-to-interpret locally linear model. For a new test sample, the proposed model can predict the values of its target variable and weight vector, as well as their uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T13:22:24Z)
• Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Bias Model [0.6850683267295248]
  Most existing approaches replace an outlier-prone Gaussian likelihood with a non-Gaussian likelihood induced from a heavy tail distribution. The proposed approach models an outlier as a noisy and biased observation of an unknown regression function. Conditioned on the bias estimates, the robust GP regression can be reduced to a standard GP regression problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T06:21:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.