Unbiased Recommender Systems with Implicit Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16704v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:23:52 GMT
• Title: Unbiased Recommender Systems with Implicit Feedback
• Abstract summary: Position bias occurs when higher-ranked items receive more interactions regardless of true relevance.<n>Popularity bias reinforces frequent exposure of popular items while under-recommending relevant, yet less popular ones.<n>This research focuses on mitigating position bias and popularity bias in recommender systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems typically rely on implicit feedback (e.g., clicks) to infer user preferences. However, such data is inherently prone to various biases, including position bias and popularity bias. Position bias occurs when higher-ranked items receive more interactions regardless of true relevance. Popularity bias reinforces frequent exposure of popular items while under-recommending relevant, yet less popular ones. Directly learning from such data fails to capture true user preferences, leading to suboptimal recommendations. This research focuses on mitigating position bias and popularity bias in recommender systems. Specifically, I address position bias in learning-to-rank (LTR) systems and popularity bias in collaborative filtering (CF) models and social recommender systems based on graph neural networks. My work develops methods that overcome the limitations of existing approaches to mitigating position bias and popularity bias, enabling more relevant and personalized recommendations that align with users' preferences.

Related papers

• Aligning Recommendations with User Popularity Preferences [2.1976433151201658]
  Popularity bias is a pervasive problem in recommender systems, where recommendations disproportionately favor popular items.<n>This work studies popularity bias through the lens of user-recommender alignment.<n>We propose SPREE, an inference-time mitigation method for sequential recommenders based on activation steering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T15:45:24Z)
• The Unfairness of Multifactorial Bias in Recommendation [68.35079031029616]
  Popularity bias and positivity bias are prominent sources of bias in recommender systems.<n>In this work, we examine how multifactorial bias influences item-side fairness.<n>We adapt a percentile-based rating transformation as a pre-processing strategy to mitigate multifactorial bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T08:37:43Z)
• A Causal Information-Flow Framework for Unbiased Learning-to-Rank [52.54102347581931]
  In web search and recommendation systems, user clicks are widely used to train ranking models.<n>We introduce a novel causal learning-based ranking framework that extends Unbiased Learning-to-Rank.<n>Our method consistently reduces measured bias leakage and improves ranking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T07:19:35Z)
• Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Remedies for Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [1.8692254863855962]
  Popularity bias is a well-known challenge in recommender systems, where a small number of popular items receive disproportionate attention.<n>This imbalance often results in reduced recommendation quality and unfair exposure of items.<n>We propose a post-hoc method using a Sparse Autoencoder to interpret and mitigate popularity bias in deep recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-24T10:59:56Z)
• Taming Recommendation Bias with Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity [21.645389873171908]
  Popularity bias occurs when popular items are recommended far more frequently than they should be.<n>Existing debiasing methods mitigate popularity bias often uniformly across all users.<n>We propose a novel method called CausalEPP (Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity) for taming recommendation bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T12:59:16Z)
• Large Language Models as Recommender Systems: A Study of Popularity Bias [46.17953988777199]
  Popular items are disproportionately recommended, overshadowing less popular but potentially relevant items. Recent advancements have seen the integration of general-purpose Large Language Models into recommender systems. Our study explores whether LLMs contribute to or can alleviate popularity bias in recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T12:53:37Z)
• A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation [64.44255178199846]
  We study the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations. A big hurdle is the lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. We propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T14:56:56Z)
• Going Beyond Popularity and Positivity Bias: Correcting for Multifactorial Bias in Recommender Systems [74.47680026838128]
  Two typical forms of bias in user interaction data with recommender systems (RSs) are popularity bias and positivity bias. We consider multifactorial selection bias affected by both item and rating value factors. We propose smoothing and alternating gradient descent techniques to reduce variance and improve the robustness of its optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:18:21Z)
• Whole Page Unbiased Learning to Rank [59.52040055543542]
  Unbiased Learning to Rank(ULTR) algorithms are proposed to learn an unbiased ranking model with biased click data. We propose a Bias Agnostic whole-page unbiased Learning to rank algorithm, named BAL, to automatically find the user behavior model. Experimental results on a real-world dataset verify the effectiveness of the BAL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T16:53:08Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• Unbiased Pairwise Learning to Rank in Recommender Systems [4.058828240864671]
  Unbiased learning to rank algorithms are appealing candidates and have already been applied in many applications with single categorical labels. We propose a novel unbiased LTR algorithm to tackle the challenges, which innovatively models position bias in the pairwise fashion. Experiment results on public benchmark datasets and internal live traffic show the superior results of the proposed method for both categorical and continuous labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T06:04:59Z)
• Correcting the User Feedback-Loop Bias for Recommendation Systems [34.44834423714441]
  We propose a systematic and dynamic way to correct user feedback-loop bias in recommendation systems. Our method includes a deep-learning component to learn each user's dynamic rating history embedding. We empirically validated the existence of such user feedback-loop bias in real world recommendation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T15:02:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.