zLend: A Dual-Scope Cash-Flow Reconstruction Framework for On-Chain Credit Underwriting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16856v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:39:05 GMT
- Title: zLend: A Dual-Scope Cash-Flow Reconstruction Framework for On-Chain Credit Underwriting
- Abstract summary: zLend is a cash-flow underwriting framework that reconstructs a wallet's daily balance history from raw token transfers.<n>We derive liquidity coverage against a fixed loan size, cash-flow volatility and regularity, a drawdown-and-recovery statistic adapted from quantitative finance, and a recurring-counterparty detector.
- Score: 0.6232409754065279
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Decentralized lending lacks a credit bureau: a borrower's capacity to repay must be inferred entirely from public on-chain activity, without income verification or a liability record. This paper presents zLend, a deployed cash-flow underwriting framework that reconstructs a wallet's daily balance history from raw token transfers and derives short-duration repayment-capacity signals from it. The reconstruction is performed twice per wallet, once restricted to a fixed stablecoin basket and once over all fungible transfers, on the premise that a wallet's total token holdings and its liquid, spendable balance are distinct quantities whose conflation misprices risk. From each series we derive liquidity coverage against a fixed loan size, cash-flow volatility and regularity, a drawdown-and-recovery statistic adapted from quantitative finance, and a recurring-counterparty detector that identifies salary-like payment cadence from transfer timing alone. The two views are then compared: a wallet with large aggregate holdings whose stablecoin reserve rarely covers the loan size is flagged as a liquidity mismatch irrespective of total wealth. We specify the pipeline formally, document the golden-master methodology used to verify a cross-language production migration to numerical tolerance 1e-9, and characterize the tier function's parameter sensitivity with an independent reimplementation validated to exact agreement (78 of 78 field assertions) against the deployed system's reference fixtures. Tier assignment is governed predominantly by the reference loan size, with four of six reference wallets changing tier across loan sizes from USD 10 to USD 25,000; the drawdown and coverage criteria bind on disjoint wallets, so neither subsumes the other; and no criterion in the tier rule is inert. zLend is deployed in production, informing real lending decisions via third-party API integrations.
Related papers
- RWA-PoB: A Credential-Based Proof-of-Backing Framework for Tokenized U.S. Treasury Products [0.7009487789080343]
We propose RWA-PoB, a credential-based proof-of-backing framework for tokenized U.S. Treasury products.<n>The framework evaluates backing adequacy through the Backing Coverage Ratio (BCR) and short-term redemption capacity.<n>We evaluate the framework against a simplified aggregate PoR baseline using USDY-calibrated liabilities and deterministic synthetic reserve scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T01:11:04Z) - Agents That Certify Their Own Exploits: Confidence-Scheduled Restricted Responses for Safe Opponent Exploitation [38.06569764716213]
We introduce emphbudget-constrained confidence-scheduled restricted responses (CS-RNR)<n>CS-RNR is the first opponent-exploitation method whose safety guarantee is a certificate the agent computes on the strategy it actually deploys.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T16:57:57Z) - The Fungible Reserve Standard: A Deterministic Framework for Encoding Carrying Costs in Asset-Backed Tokens [0.0]
Fungible Reserve Standard (FRS) is a deterministic token design framework that encodes carrying costs transparently into on-chain logic.<n>The framework is asset-agnostic and applicable to any real-world asset with positive, predictable holding costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-25T07:34:05Z) - What Accuracy and Gradient Cosine Miss: Evaluating Feedback Alignment via Scale Stability, Reference Validity, and Depth Utility [48.10132234701036]
We propose a diagnostic evaluation protocol based on three checks -- scale stability, reference validity, and depth utility -- together with per-layer rather than aggregate cosine reporting.<n>Across multiple architectures and methods, our protocol identifies all failures with wide calibration margins.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-19T06:04:17Z) - Re-feeding Is Not Replaying: Measuring Replay Noise in Counterfactual Token-Credit Estimation [0.0]
Per-token counterfactual credit estimation asks which token in a language-model rollout caused the final answer to be right or wrong.<n>We measure what that assumption costs on a stock inference engine, with a three-pass design.<n>Across six configurations and three models, re-feeding changes the credit estimate at rates 14-28 percentage points above the replica floor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-14T06:09:16Z) - Proof of Source of Funds: Efficient On-chain Provenance of Cryptoassets [5.222265639534245]
We introduce Proof of Source of Funds (PoSoF), a novel cryptographic framework that shifts the burden to the user.<n>PoSoF provides verifiable cryptographic provenance; it guarantees the legitimacy of the funds without leaking the intermediate transaction topology.<n>Our benchmarks demonstrate that fully private, proactive compliance is highly practical.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-08T21:07:02Z) - Empowering VLMs for Few-Shot Multimodal Time Series Classification via Tailored Agentic Reasoning [44.69766273765273]
We propose the first VL$underlinetextbfM$ $underlinetextbfa$gentic $underlinetextbfr$easoning framework for few-$underlinetextbfs$hot multimodal $underlinetextbfT$ime $underlinetextbfS$eries $underlinetextbfC$lassification ($textbfMarsTSC$), which introduces a self-evolving knowledge bank as a dynamic context iteratively refined via reflective agent
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T07:47:09Z) - When No Benchmark Exists: Validating Comparative LLM Safety Scoring Without Ground-Truth Labels [34.86529553336423]
Many deployments must compare candidate language models for safety before a labeled benchmark exists for the relevant language, sector, or regulatory regime.<n>We formalize this setting as benchmarkless comparative safety scoring and specify the contract under which a scenario-based audit can be interpreted as deployment evidence.<n>Scores are valid only under a fixed scenario pack, rubric, auditor, judge, sampling configuration, and rerun budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T17:56:41Z) - GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts [52.51342355102833]
Cross-chain bridges, the critical infrastructure of the multi-chain ecosystem, have become a primary target for attackers.<n>Existing defenses, such as bytecode-level static analysis, are ill-equipped to handle the semantic complexity of cross-chain interactions.<n>We propose GoAT-X, a framework that shifts automated cross-chain smart contracts auditing from pattern matching toward systematic first-principles verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T11:34:21Z) - Phase Transition for Budgeted Multi-Agent Synergy [41.486076708302456]
Multi-agent systems can improve reliability, yet under a fixed inference budget they often help, saturate, or even collapse.<n>We develop a minimal and calibratable theory that predicts these regimes from three binding constraints of modern agent stacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-24T05:32:50Z) - CreditAudit: 2$^\text{nd}$ Dimension for LLM Evaluation and Selection [44.251742023911135]
CreditAudit is a deployment oriented credit audit framework that evaluates models under a family of semantically aligned and non adversarial system prompt templates.<n>We show that models with similar mean ability can exhibit substantially different fluctuation, and stability risk can overturn prioritization decisions in agentic or high failure cost regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T07:53:25Z) - ASAS-BridgeAMM: Trust-Minimized Cross-Chain Bridge AMM with Failure Containment [5.151910664667141]
Cross-chain bridges constitute the single largest vector of systemic risk in Decentralized Finance (DeFi)<n>We present ASAS-BridgeAMM, a bridge-coupled automated market maker that introduces Contained Degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T14:40:26Z) - StealthDust: Secret Quorums for Faster Fractional Spending [0.2446948464551684]
We address the Fractional Spending Problem using (k1, k2)-quorum systems - both introduced by Bazzi and Tucci-Piergiovanni (PODC 2024)<n>We propose a new protocol called StealthDust, where secret quorums allow to reduce payment latency from five to three communications steps and improve settlment message complexity from O(n3) to O(n2) compared to the original protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T14:37:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.