Sound and Efficient Certification of High-Quality Qubit Operations: Theory and Experiment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17005v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:03:00 GMT
- Title: Sound and Efficient Certification of High-Quality Qubit Operations: Theory and Experiment
- Abstract summary: We introduce a sound black-box certification protocol for a single-qubit gate based on a small set of fixed, deterministic sequences.<n>From the data, the protocol derives finite-sample bounds on the gate's rotation eigenvalue, a gauge-invariant property.<n>We prove that these spectral constraints imply, up to a physically meaningful unitary change of basis, a rigorous average gate-fidelity lower bound for every time-independent qubit model.
- Score: 23.48673361417131
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Can a high-quality quantum gate be certified when uncharacterized state-preparation and measurement errors are dominant? Can this be achieved with low experimental overhead? Here, we introduce a sound black-box certification protocol for a single-qubit gate based on a small set of fixed, deterministic sequences. From the data, the protocol derives finite-sample bounds on the gate's rotation eigenvalue, a gauge-invariant property. Its phase reveals the accuracy of the rotation angle, while its modulus quantifies the loss of coherence under repeated gate applications. We implement the protocol on a $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}^{+}$ trapped-ion processor and certify the $\sqrt{\mathrm{X}}$-gate rotation eigenvalue using $22\,000$ circuit executions, and demonstrate the robustness of certification to state-preparation and measurement errors by deliberately degrading the readout. Finally, we prove that these spectral constraints imply, up to a physically meaningful unitary change of basis, a rigorous average gate-fidelity lower bound for every time-independent qubit model compatible with the data. In both readout settings, the spectral bounds yield the same fidelity certificate of $99.94(3)\%$ with $99\%$ confidence. Our results establish a new standard for quantum-gate certification by combining soundness and experimental efficiency without requiring trusted reference operations, randomized circuits, or model fitting.
Related papers
- Correction and Corruption: A Two-Rate View of Error Flow in LLM Protocols [51.56484100374058]
We propose a paired-outcome measurement interface for auditing a single protocol step on exact-match tasks.<n>For each instance, the interface records a baseline correctness bit and a post-step correctness bit.<n>These rates predict accuracy changes and define a reusable empirical interface testable across seeds, mixtures, and pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T13:25:40Z) - Autonomous Hamiltonian certification and changepoint detection [1.2021700665093262]
Environmental noise can cause calibrated Hamiltonian parameters to drift over time, necessitating expensive recalibration.<n>We develop efficient Hamiltonian certification and changepoint detection protocols in the autonomous setting.<n>Our approach enables quantum devices to autonomously monitor their own calibration status without requiring entangling systems, verification operations, or a trusted reference device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-27T17:54:45Z) - Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z) - Benchmarking Single-Qubit Gates on a Neutral Atom Quantum Processor [0.0]
We present benchmarking results for single-qubit gates implemented on a neutral atom quantum processor.<n>For single-qubit gates, DRB yields an average fidelity of $99.963 pm 0.016%$.<n>We introduce a gauge optimization procedure for GST that brings the reconstructed gates, input states, and measurements into a canonical frame.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T16:58:44Z) - Robust Conformal Prediction with a Single Binary Certificate [58.450154976190795]
Conformal prediction (CP) converts any model's output to prediction sets with a guarantee to cover the true label with (adjustable) high probability.<n>We propose a robust conformal prediction that produces smaller sets even with significantly lower MC samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T08:41:53Z) - Classical certification of quantum gates under the dimension assumption [0.1874930567916036]
We introduce a certification method for quantum gates tailored for a practical server-user scenario.<n>For single-qubit gates, including those that form a universal set for single-qubit quantum computation, we demonstrate that our approach offers soundness guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T13:40:39Z) - Fault-tolerant quantum computation using large spin cat-codes [0.8640652806228457]
We construct a fault-tolerant quantum error-correcting protocol based on a qubit encoded in a large spin qudit using a spin-cat code.
We show how to generate a universal gate set, including the rank-preserving CNOT gate, using quantum control and the Rydberg blockade.
These findings pave the way for encoding a qubit in a large spin with the potential to achieve fault tolerance, high threshold, and reduced resource overhead in quantum information processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-08T22:56:05Z) - Calibration-Independent Certification of a Quantum Frequency Converter [0.0]
We report on a method to certify a unitary operation with the help of source and measurement apparatuses.
As in the device-independent paradigm our certification method relies on a Bell test, but it removes the need for high detection efficiencies.
We demonstrate the successful frequency conversion with an average certified fidelity of $geq 84,%$ and an efficiency $geq 3.1times 10-6$ at a confidence level of $99,%$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T09:13:00Z) - Witnessing entanglement in trapped-ion quantum error correction under
realistic noise [41.94295877935867]
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) exploits redundancy by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits.
We present a detailed microscopic error model to estimate the average gate infidelity of two-qubit light-shift gates used in trapped-ion platforms.
We then apply this realistic error model to quantify the multipartite entanglement generated by circuits that act as QEC building blocks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T20:00:36Z) - Experimental Bayesian calibration of trapped ion entangling operations [48.43720700248091]
We develop and characterize an efficient calibration protocol to automatically estimate and adjust experimental parameters of the widely used Molmer-Sorensen entangling gate operation.
We experimentally demonstrate a median gate infidelity of $1.3(1)cdot10-3$, requiring only $1200pm500$ experimental cycles, while completing the entire gate calibration procedure in less than one minute.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T16:59:00Z) - Fault-tolerant parity readout on a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum
computer [64.47265213752996]
We experimentally demonstrate a fault-tolerant weight-4 parity check measurement scheme.
We achieve a flag-conditioned parity measurement single-shot fidelity of 93.2(2)%.
The scheme is an essential building block in a broad class of stabilizer quantum error correction protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-13T20:08:04Z) - Efficient and robust certification of genuine multipartite entanglement
in noisy quantum error correction circuits [58.720142291102135]
We introduce a conditional witnessing technique to certify genuine multipartite entanglement (GME)
We prove that the detection of entanglement in a linear number of bipartitions by a number of measurements scales linearly, suffices to certify GME.
We apply our method to the noisy readout of stabilizer operators of the distance-three topological color code and its flag-based fault-tolerant version.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T18:00:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.