What Makes Software Issue Resolution Tasks Difficult for Agents?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18280v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:59:16 GMT
• Title: What Makes Software Issue Resolution Tasks Difficult for Agents?
• Abstract summary: We investigate what structural properties of software tasks correspond to agent success rates for issue resolution tasks.<n>We conducted a large scale empirical study on CoderForge-Preview, the largest open dataset of coding agent trajectories to date.
• Score: 5.974359772961166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background. Advances in agentic systems are simultaneously, and rapidly, saturating benchmarks. Despite this often discussed phenomena, benchmark scores remain difficult to interpret due to the lack of control and characterization of task difficulty. More specifically, we currently have little understanding of what makes one task harder than another, and to what extent task difficulty is predictable from static task properties. Aims. We propose a measurement framework to investigate and systematically quantify what structural properties of software tasks correspond to agent success rates for issue resolution tasks. Method. We conducted a large scale empirical study on CoderForge-Preview, the largest open dataset of coding agent trajectories to date, by extracting features across task patch, repository and prompt. We evaluated the predictive power of each feature against task outcomes using ensemble methods, SHAP attribution, and effect size analysis. Results We found that task difficulty is substantially predictable from static features (AU C = 0.863) and is largely driven by patch fragmentation and repository scale. Prompt linguistic features become visible among top contributors for tasks in the mid-band, revealing a layered structure of difficulty. Conclusion. The difficulty of an issue resolution task is encoded in its structure. This enables static, pre-hoc difficulty estimation and lays the groundwork for difficulty-controlled benchmark construction for evaluation of agents.

Related papers

• Predicting Task Difficulty Without Rollouts [0.0]
  We study textitex ante difficulty prediction across 17 agentic benchmarks spanning coding, mathematics, machine learning, web navigation, function calling, and other domains.<n>We show that AUC can mask poor difficulty estimates, identify token-level entropy as a useful predictive signal, and show how residuals between expected and observed difficulty can expose hidden environment flaws such as contamination and infeasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T09:33:09Z)
• TrajAudit: Automated Failure Diagnosis for Agentic Coding Systems [18.833806809109536]
  Agentic systems have been widely studied to automate software engineering jobs such as bug fixing.<n>Existing automated failure diagnosis approaches leverage task execution trajectories, yet their effectiveness degrades as trajectory length and complexity increase.<n>For repository-level coding tasks specifically, trajectories are laden with noise, such as redundant program structure and verbose code context.<n>We propose TrajAudit, the first failure diagnosis framework for repository-level coding trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T05:24:37Z)
• Agent psychometrics: Task-level performance prediction in agentic coding benchmarks [24.348135523715815]
  We present a framework for predicting success or failure on individual tasks tailored to the agentic coding regime.<n>Our approach augments Item Response Theory (IRT) with rich features extracted from tasks, including issue statements, repository contexts, solutions, and test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T07:59:59Z)
• 4OPS: Structural Difficulty Modeling in Integer Arithmetic Puzzles [0.0]
  Arithmetic puzzle games provide a controlled setting for studying difficulty in mathematical reasoning tasks.<n>We develop an exact dynamic-programming solver that enumerates reachable targets, extracts minimal-operation witnesses, and enables large-scale labeling.<n>We show that difficulty is fully determined by a small set of interpretable structural attributes derived from exact witnesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T12:01:39Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• Operationalising the Superficial Alignment Hypothesis via Task Complexity [49.93635747700126]
  We propose a new metric called task complexity: the length of the shortest program that achieves a target performance on a task.<n>Our results highlight that task adaptation often requires surprisingly little information -- often just a few kilobytes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T18:59:39Z)
• Breakpoint: Scalable evaluation of system-level reasoning in LLM code agents [40.37993572657772]
  We introduce Breakpoint, a benchmarking methodology that automatically generates code-repair tasks by adversarially corrupting functions.<n>We demonstrate that our methodology can scale to arbitrary difficulty, with state-of-the-art models' success rates ranging from 55% on the easiest tasks down to 0% on the hardest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T19:23:51Z)
• Guiding Through Complexity: What Makes Good Supervision for Hard Math Reasoning Tasks? [74.88417042125985]
  We investigate various data-driven strategies that offer supervision data at different quality levels upon tasks of varying complexity.<n>We find that even when the outcome error rate for hard task supervision is high, training on such data can outperform perfectly correct supervision of easier subtasks.<n>Our results also reveal that supplementing hard task supervision with the corresponding subtask supervision can yield notable performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T17:55:27Z)
• Exposing and Addressing Cross-Task Inconsistency in Unified Vision-Language Models [80.23791222509644]
  Inconsistent AI models are considered brittle and untrustworthy by human users. We find that state-of-the-art vision-language models suffer from a surprisingly high degree of inconsistent behavior across tasks. We propose a rank correlation-based auxiliary training objective, computed over large automatically created cross-task contrast sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T16:57:12Z)
• Fast Inference and Transfer of Compositional Task Structures for Few-shot Task Generalization [101.72755769194677]
  We formulate it as a few-shot reinforcement learning problem where a task is characterized by a subtask graph. Our multi-task subtask graph inferencer (MTSGI) first infers the common high-level task structure in terms of the subtask graph from the training tasks. Our experiment results on 2D grid-world and complex web navigation domains show that the proposed method can learn and leverage the common underlying structure of the tasks for faster adaptation to the unseen tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T10:44:25Z)
• CausalWorld: A Robotic Manipulation Benchmark for Causal Structure and Transfer Learning [138.40338621974954]
  CausalWorld is a benchmark for causal structure and transfer learning in a robotic manipulation environment. Tasks consist of constructing 3D shapes from a given set of blocks - inspired by how children learn to build complex structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T23:01:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.