When Does Dynamic Ensembling Pay Off? Diagnosing Regionwise Gains in Regression under Distribution Shift

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18330v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 21:31:30 GMT
• Title: When Does Dynamic Ensembling Pay Off? Diagnosing Regionwise Gains in Regression under Distribution Shift
• Abstract summary: We show that a labeled target-domain probe can tell us when reallocating trust across regions will pay off.<n>We release OpenRegShift, a reproducible evaluation harness for regression ensembles under distribution sensitivity.
• Score: 4.583541422554719
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Whether input-dependent ("dynamic") combination of a regression model pool beats the best static blend depends on the shift and is rarely known before deployment. Can a small labeled target-domain probe tell us when reallocating trust across regions of the input space will pay off? We answer this with $\widehat{D}_{\mathrm{CF5}}$, which estimates from the probe the cross-fitted gain of the regionwise convex combination over the best static convex blend: the realizable value of deciding, region by region, whom to trust. Across a frozen suite of 12 dataset-shift pairs (spatial, temporal, domain, feature-cluster), $\widehat{D}_{\mathrm{CF5}}$ predicts realized regionwise test gains with dataset-level Spearman $+0.98$ (95% CI $[+0.83, +1.00]$; $p=5\times10^{-5}$), including two cases overturning preregistered expectations. The relationship holds in a 16-pair sensitivity analysis (Spearman $+0.83$), whereas alternative probe diagnostics reach at most $+0.66$. This contrast isolates regional trust reallocation: correlation is $+0.98$ for regionwise-convex gain, but $+0.01$ for smooth covariate-dependent stacking after affine correction. A controlled generator shows dynamic gains arise from the interaction of shift heterogeneity and local competence, increase with shift severity, and become realizable between 128 and 256 probe labels in the tested grid. The Probe-Validated Ensemble Selector chooses among a static affine stacker and dynamic realizers, deploying a candidate only when a held-out lower confidence bound clears the static-convex floor. In a preregistered prospective batch, it matched or improved the floor in all 12 runs; two deployments reduced test risk by 11% and 16%, while the gate rejected a candidate whose un-gated deployment incurred $>30\times$ the static loss. We release OpenRegShift, a reproducible evaluation harness for regression ensembles under distribution shift.

Related papers

• Asymptotic-Preserving A Posteriori Analysis of Diffusion and Flow-Matching Samplers [0.6768558752130311]
  Diffusion and flow-matching samplers integrate a learned probability-flow ODE from a large noise scale down to a small terminal floor $_min$, at which the score is stiff and the flow develops a boundary layer.<n>We treat $_min$ as a singular-perturbation parameter and determine which fixed-step samplers are solvable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T04:48:33Z)
• Decoherence as Defence and the Magnitude of Noise Regularisation: A Rigorous N -Qubit Theory of Stochastic Quantum Neural Networks for Adversarially Robust Network Intrusion Detection [0.0]
  We give an $N$-qubit formulation through the master equation and its vectorised Liouvillian.<n>We prove a emphdecoherence-contraction theorem: a depolarising channel of strength.<n>We show this robustness arises from a noise-reshaped training boundary rather than from attack-time contraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T07:06:56Z)
• GRACE: Gated Refinement for Accurate Causal Edge Discovery in High-Dimensional Time Series [0.0]
  Fast linear CI skeleton provides high-recall candidates.<n>A single gated model prunes false positives by learning which edges genuinely improve prediction.<n> GRACE matches or exceeds expensive nonlinear CI tests at a fraction of the cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T19:26:38Z)
• Is Spurious Correlation Removal Always Learnable? [56.28155520961125]
  Invariant learning can fail even when the structure is statistically identifiable.<n>We show a conditional computational barrier: under a black-box samplable supervised sparse recovery primitive, there exist emphamplable multi-dimensional environments.<n>Synthetic and real datasets illustrate the predicted gaps and transitions and motivate simple diversity diagnostics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T05:49:43Z)
• Smart Ensemble Learning Framework for Predicting Groundwater Heavy Metal Pollution [0.0]
  Groundwater in the Densu Basin is increasingly threatened by heavy metal contamination.<n>A key challenge is modelling the Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI), which is typically skewed and affected by correlated contaminants.<n>This study develops a framework integrating response transformations with nested cross-validated ensemble machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T21:40:18Z)
• Hardware Validation of DAGI via a Modular "Ridge" Signature and High-Order Synergistic Information [0.0]
  DAGI (Directed Acyclic Graph Information) framework on IBM Quantum hardware.<n>Small, controlled experiment whose ideal output distribution is constrained to a low-dimensional modular manifold (a "ridge)<n>Key recovery exceeds chance: per-shot accuracy 0.1689 (chance 0.125, 95% Wilson CI [0.1610, 0.1772])<n>These results support the claim that DAGI detects and quantifies non-trivial, hardware-resilient information structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T14:16:59Z)
• Tight Convergence Rates for Online Distributed Linear Estimation with Adversarial Measurements [66.94250413799232]
  We study mean estimation of a random vector $X$ in a distributed parameter-server-worker setup.<n>Key challenges are adversarial measurements and asynchrony.<n>Results provide a unified finite-time characterization of robustness, identifiability, and statistical efficiency in distributed linear estimation with adversarial workers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T11:45:55Z)
• Optimal Unconstrained Self-Distillation in Ridge Regression: Strict Improvements, Precise Asymptotics, and One-Shot Tuning [61.07540493350384]
  Self-distillation (SD) is the process of retraining a student on a mixture of ground-truth and the teacher's own predictions.<n>We show that for any prediction risk, the optimally mixed student improves upon the ridge teacher for every regularization level.<n>We propose a consistent one-shot tuning method to estimate $star$ without grid search, sample splitting, or refitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T17:21:15Z)
• Statistical Learning under Heterogeneous Distribution Shift [71.8393170225794]
  Ground-truth predictor is additive $mathbbE[mathbfz mid mathbfx,mathbfy] = f_star(mathbfx) +g_star(mathbfy)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T16:34:21Z)
• Beyond Invariance: Test-Time Label-Shift Adaptation for Distributions with "Spurious" Correlations [44.99833362998488]
  Changes in the data distribution at test time can have deleterious effects on the performance of predictive models. We propose a test-time label shift correction that adapts to changes in the joint distribution $p(y, z)$ using EM applied to unlabeled samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T18:52:33Z)
• Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Time [97.11565882347772]
  We study the problem of high-dimensional robust linear regression where a learner is given access to $n$ samples from the generative model $Y = langle X,w* rangle + epsilon$ We propose estimators for this problem under two settings: (i) $X$ is L4-L2 hypercontractive, $mathbbE [XXtop]$ has bounded condition number and $epsilon$ has bounded variance and (ii) $X$ is sub-Gaussian with identity second moment and $epsilon$ is
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T06:44:44Z)
• Agnostic Learning of a Single Neuron with Gradient Descent [92.7662890047311]
  We consider the problem of learning the best-fitting single neuron as measured by the expected square loss. For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$. For the ReLU activation, our population risk guarantee is $O(mathsfOPT1/2)+epsilon$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T07:20:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.