LLMs as Acquisition Policies for Finite-Pool Materials Optimization: A Controlled Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19790v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:37:02 GMT
• Title: LLMs as Acquisition Policies for Finite-Pool Materials Optimization: A Controlled Study
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether open-weight large language models (LLMs) can serve as standalone acquisition policies.<n>We evaluate five LLMs across four retrospective finite-pool materials optimization tasks.<n>Overall, open-weight LLMs show potential as acquisition policies for finite-pool materials search.
• Score: 10.813187929845398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Discovering materials with desirable properties often requires searching large candidate spaces while experimental or computational evaluations remain costly. Active learning addresses this challenge by using previous observations to select which candidate to evaluate next, typically through probabilistic surrogate models. We investigate whether open-weight large language models (LLMs) can serve as standalone acquisition policies in this setting. We evaluate five LLMs across four retrospective finite-pool materials optimization tasks under different candidate-presentation strategies and compare them with random selection and conventional Gaussian-process methods. LLM policies generally reach the global optimum in fewer iterations than random selection, indicating that they provide a useful acquisition signal without task-specific training. Their performance relative to Gaussian-process methods is mixed: conventional acquisition performs better on most tasks, while LLMs match or outperform it in some settings. Performance varies substantially across tasks, models, initializations, and candidate presentations, with no LLM approach performing best across all tasks. Overall, open-weight LLMs show potential as acquisition policies for finite-pool materials search, although their reliability remains sensitive to the task and to how candidates and scientific context are presented.

Related papers

• Mixture of Complementary Agents for Robust LLM Ensemble [28.210955621253863]
  Multi-AI collaboration, such as ensembling or debating large language models (LLMs), is a promising paradigm for aggregating information and boosting performance.<n>Existing approaches primarily focus on accuracy (picking the strongest models) or diversity (ensuring variety)<n>We reframe proposer selection as a selection problem akin to feature selection, where the value of an LLM lies in its complementarity with others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T21:29:05Z)
• Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process [58.265053900416895]
  LLM-PeerReview is built on a novel, peer-review-inspired framework.<n>It operates in three stages: For scoring, we use the emerging LLM-as-a-Judge technique.<n>For reasoning, we can apply a graphical model-based truth inference algorithm.<n>Finally, the highest-scoring response is selected as the best ensemble output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T05:25:49Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Answer Selection for Improved Reasoning in Multi-LLM Systems [55.6590601898194]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities, yet selecting the most reliable response from multiple LLMs remains a challenge.<n>Existing approaches often depend on costly external verifiers, human evaluators, or self-consistency techniques that require multiple samples from a single model.<n>We propose a principled, novel and computationally efficient method to select the best response from multiple different LLMs using a calibrated log-likelihood score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T01:25:19Z)
• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• OptiSeq: Ordering Examples On-The-Fly for In-Context Learning [8.603219414567084]
  We introduce OptiSeq, a purely inference-time, dataset-free optimization method that efficiently determines the best example order.<n>We show that OptiSeq improves accuracy by 5.5 - 10.5 percentage points across multiple tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T02:24:00Z)
• EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z)
• SelectLLM: Query-Aware Efficient Selection Algorithm for Large Language Models [8.558834738072363]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted due to their remarkable performance across various applications.<n>These individual LLMs show limitations in generalization and performance on complex tasks due to inherent training biases, model size constraints, and the quality or diversity of pre-training datasets.<n>We introduce SelectLLM, which efficiently directs input queries to the most suitable subset of LLMs from a large pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T06:11:21Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• MetaLLM: A High-performant and Cost-efficient Dynamic Framework for Wrapping LLMs [20.793892860721712]
  We introduce MetaLLM, a framework that dynamically and intelligently routes each query to the optimal large language models (LLMs)<n>By framing the selection problem as a multi-armed bandit, MetaLLM balances prediction accuracy and cost efficiency under uncertainty.<n>Our experiments, conducted on popular LLM platforms such as OpenAI and Together AI, showcase MetaLLM's efficacy in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T15:45:07Z)
• On Speeding Up Language Model Evaluation [48.51924035873411]
  We propose an $textitadaptive$ approach to explore this space.<n>We lean on multi-armed bandits to sequentially identify the next (method, validation sample)-pair to evaluate.<n>We show that it can identify the top-performing method using only 5-15% of the typical resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:48:42Z)
• Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalization [39.070662999014836]
  We present a new framework for reward optimization, Value Augmented Sampling (VAS) VAS solves for the optimal reward-maximizing policy without co-training the policy and the value function. Our algorithm unlocks the new capability of composing several rewards and controlling the extent of each one during deployment time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:59:04Z)
• PALR: Personalization Aware LLMs for Recommendation [7.407353565043918]
  PALR aims to combine user history behaviors (such as clicks, purchases, ratings, etc.) with large language models (LLMs) to generate user preferred items. Our solution outperforms state-of-the-art models on various sequential recommendation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T17:21:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.