Artificial Intelligence for Workflow Analysis in Colorectal Surgery: A Multicentric, Cross-Procedural Development and Generalization Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20154v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 15:13:59 GMT
- Title: Artificial Intelligence for Workflow Analysis in Colorectal Surgery: A Multicentric, Cross-Procedural Development and Generalization Study
- Abstract summary: ColoWorkflow, a tool for the video-based assessment (VBA) of MIS-CRS workflow, was recently validated.<n>This study presents AI-ColoWorkflow, a deep learning model for automated surgical workflow analysis across MIS-CRS.
- Score: 4.501571565428303
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Minimally invasive colorectal surgeries (MIS-CRS) are characterised by significant variability and inconsistent outcomes. ColoWorkflow, a tool for the video-based assessment (VBA) of MIS-CRS workflow, was recently validated. However, manual VBA is time-consuming, limiting implementation. This study presents AI-ColoWorkflow, a deep learning model for automated surgical workflow analysis across MIS-CRS. Operative videos of MIS-CRS were collected from 4 centres and a publicly available dataset. Phases and steps were manually annotated according to ColoWorkflow. A deep learning model combining a fine-tuned DINOv3 vision transformer for per-frame visual feature extraction with a hierarchical multi-stage temporal convolutional network was jointly optimized for phase and step recognition. The model trained on pooled multicentric data, namely AI-ColoWorkflow was compared against centre-specific and procedure-specific models on a held-out test set. The following metrics were used for evaluation: macro F1 score, balanced accuracy, precision, and recall. AI-ColoWorkflow achieved a macro F1 of 73.01% $\pm$ 10.27 (balanced accuracy 73.43%) for phase recognition and 39.82% $\pm$ 7.06 (balanced accuracy 38.65%) for step recognition. The global model outperformed centre- and procedure-specific models in most experiments except procedure-specific step recognition. In the generalization analysis, mean F1 was 48.42% for phase recognition. AI-ColoWorkflow can reliably recognize MIS-CRS phases. A single model trained on pooled, multicentric, multi-procedural data generalises at least as well as and often better than centre- or procedure-specific models for phase recognition in MIS-CRS, while procedure-specific step models retain advantages for certain procedure types, motivating hybrid training strategies for future surgical AI development.
Related papers
- Expert Consensus-based Video-Based Assessment Tool for Workflow Analysis in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: Development and Validation of ColoWorkflow [4.2710633896098456]
Video-based assessment (VBA) offers an opportunity to generate data-driven insights to reduce variability, optimize training, and improve surgical performance.<n>Existing tools for workflow analysis remain difficult to standardize and implement.<n>This study aims to develop and validate a VBA tool for workflow analysis across minimally invasive colorectal procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T19:33:36Z) - The CRITICAL Records Integrated Standardization Pipeline (CRISP): End-to-End Processing of Large-scale Multi-institutional OMOP CDM Data [1.3724581418672368]
This dataset contains 1.95 billion records from 371,365 patients across four geographically diverse CTSA institutions.<n>CRITICAL's unique strength lies in capturing full-spectrum patient journeys, including pre-ICU, ICU, and post-ICU encounters.<n>We present CRISP to unlock the full potential of this valuable resource.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T03:06:24Z) - An Interpretable Transformer-Based Foundation Model for Cross-Procedural Skill Assessment Using Raw fNIRS Signals [0.0]
We introduce an interpretable transformer-based foundation model trained on minimally processed fNIRS signals for cross-procedural skill assessment.<n>The model achieves greater than 88% classification accuracy on all tasks, with Matthews Correlation Coefficient exceeding 0.91 on ETI.<n>It generalizes to a novel emergency airway procedure--cricothyrotomy--using fewer than 30 labeled samples and a lightweight (less than 2k parameter) adapter module.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-21T18:30:58Z) - AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learning [68.75885518081357]
This paper introduces an innovative technique called Adaptive Model Merging (AdaMerging)
It aims to autonomously learn the coefficients for model merging, either in a task-wise or layer-wise manner, without relying on the original training data.
Compared to the current state-of-the-art task arithmetic merging scheme, AdaMerging showcases a remarkable 11% improvement in performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T04:26:33Z) - The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease
detection [51.697248252191265]
This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation.
We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare.
Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z) - An Empirical Study of Multimodal Model Merging [148.48412442848795]
Model merging is a technique that fuses multiple models trained on different tasks to generate a multi-task solution.
We conduct our study for a novel goal where we can merge vision, language, and cross-modal transformers of a modality-specific architecture.
We propose two metrics that assess the distance between weights to be merged and can serve as an indicator of the merging outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-28T15:43:21Z) - Automated Medical Coding on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV: A Critical Review
and Replicability Study [60.56194508762205]
We reproduce, compare, and analyze state-of-the-art automated medical coding machine learning models.
We show that several models underperform due to weak configurations, poorly sampled train-test splits, and insufficient evaluation.
We present the first comprehensive results on the newly released MIMIC-IV dataset using the reproduced models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T11:54:44Z) - Competence-based Multimodal Curriculum Learning for Medical Report
Generation [98.10763792453925]
We propose a Competence-based Multimodal Curriculum Learning framework ( CMCL) to alleviate the data bias and make best use of available data.
Specifically, CMCL simulates the learning process of radiologists and optimize the model in a step by step manner.
Experiments on the public IU-Xray and MIMIC-CXR datasets show that CMCL can be incorporated into existing models to improve their performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-24T08:16:01Z) - Task-agnostic Continual Learning with Hybrid Probabilistic Models [75.01205414507243]
We propose HCL, a Hybrid generative-discriminative approach to Continual Learning for classification.
The flow is used to learn the data distribution, perform classification, identify task changes, and avoid forgetting.
We demonstrate the strong performance of HCL on a range of continual learning benchmarks such as split-MNIST, split-CIFAR, and SVHN-MNIST.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-24T05:19:26Z) - MIcro-Surgical Anastomose Workflow recognition challenge report [12.252332806968756]
"MIcro-Surgical Anastomose recognition on training sessions" (MISAW) challenge provided a data set of 27 sequences of micro-surgical anastomosis on artificial blood vessels.
This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, and workflow annotations described at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity.
The best models achieved more than 95% AD-Accuracy for phase recognition, 80% for step recognition, 60% for activity recognition, and 75% for all granularity levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-24T11:34:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.