Machine Learning and ARIMA Model Averaging for Adaptive Public Health Forecasting: Comparative Evaluation and an Ontario COVID-19 Case Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20406v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 19:22:11 GMT
- Title: Machine Learning and ARIMA Model Averaging for Adaptive Public Health Forecasting: Comparative Evaluation and an Ontario COVID-19 Case Study
- Abstract summary: Public health forecasts must respond to abrupt changes in surveillance data without over-extrapolating noise, reporting artifacts, or temporary trends.<n>We evaluated autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models using 190 weekly observations of publicly available Ontario COVID-19 case counts from January 2020 to October 2023.<n>We also developed Machine Learning and ARIMA Model Averaging (MLAMA), a non-negative performance-weighted ensemble with weights that vary by forecast horizon and responsiveness setting.
- Score: 3.571803295833193
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Public health forecasts must respond to abrupt changes in surveillance data without over-extrapolating noise, reporting artifacts, or temporary trends. We evaluated autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models using 190 weekly observations of publicly available Ontario COVID-19 case counts from January 2020 to October 2023. Rolling-origin time-series cross-validation preserved temporal order during model tuning and evaluation. Performance was assessed across three operating dimensions: responsiveness following selected turning points, forecast horizons of one to six weeks, and the amount of historical training data. We also developed Machine Learning and ARIMA Model Averaging (MLAMA), a non-negative performance-weighted ensemble with weights that vary by forecast horizon and responsiveness setting. Retrospective comparisons showed that ARIMA adapted rapidly after turning points but its normalized error increased at longer horizons. Random forest and XGBoost were less responsive initially but maintained more stable normalized error over longer horizons. For two-week forecasts at the end of the study period, training on the most recent data outperformed using longer historical periods, particularly for XGBoost. MLAMA achieved the lowest normalized mean absolute percentage error across most forecast horizons and ranked among the best-performing methods across responsiveness settings. These findings support selecting forecasting models according to operating conditions rather than relying on a single universally preferred approach. MLAMA provides a practical framework for combining complementary statistical and machine-learning forecasts. The accompanying Python package is currently maintained in a private repository while software validation and reproducibility testing are completed.
Related papers
- Echo State Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Hyperparameter Sweep and Benchmarking [51.56484100374058]
We evaluate whether a fully automatic, purely feedback-driven ESN can serve as a competitive alternative to widely used statistical forecasting methods.<n>Forecast accuracy is measured using MASE and sMAPE and benchmarked against simple benchmarks like drift and seasonal naive and statistical models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T16:01:22Z) - Multitask LSTM for Arboviral Outbreak Prediction Using Public Health Data [0.0]
This paper presents a multitask learning approach for the joint prediction of arboviral outbreaks and case counts in Recife, Brazil.<n>The proposed model concurrently performs binary classification (outbreak detection) and regression (case forecasting) tasks.<n>The architecture delivers competitive performance across diseases and tasks, demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of unified modeling strategies for scalable epidemic forecasting in data-limited public health scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T16:58:18Z) - Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Large Time Series Models for Prediction of Wind Turbine SCADA Data [6.296946118570559]
This paper explores the application of a pre-trained large time series model, Timer, in the prediction of SCADA data collected from wind turbines.<n>The model was fine-tuned on datasets sourced from two wind farms, which exhibited differing characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-30T09:00:24Z) - Site-specific Deterministic Temperature and Humidity Forecasts with Explainable and Reliable Machine Learning [0.0]
Recent developments in machine learning have prompted increasing interest in applying ML as a novel approach towards this problem.
We develop a working ML framework, named 'Multi-SiteBoost' and initial testing results show a significant improvement compared with gridded values from bias-corrected NWP models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T09:12:13Z) - ExtremeCast: Boosting Extreme Value Prediction for Global Weather Forecast [57.6987191099507]
We introduce Exloss, a novel loss function that performs asymmetric optimization and highlights extreme values to obtain accurate extreme weather forecast.
We also introduce ExBooster, which captures the uncertainty in prediction outcomes by employing multiple random samples.
Our solution can achieve state-of-the-art performance in extreme weather prediction, while maintaining the overall forecast accuracy comparable to the top medium-range forecast models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T10:34:13Z) - Attention-Based Ensemble Pooling for Time Series Forecasting [55.2480439325792]
We propose a method for pooling that performs a weighted average over candidate model forecasts.
We test this method on two time-series forecasting problems: multi-step forecasting of the dynamics of the non-stationary Lorenz 63 equation, and one-step forecasting of the weekly incident deaths due to COVID-19.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T22:59:56Z) - Balancing Computational Efficiency and Forecast Error in Machine
Learning-based Time-Series Forecasting: Insights from Live Experiments on
Meteorological Nowcasting [0.0]
This paper addresses the relationship between computational cost and forecast error using meteorological nowcasting.
During a 5-day live experiment, 4000 data sources were streamed for training and inferencing 144 models per hour.
Results indicate that using the Variance Horizon reduced computational usage by more than 50%, while increasing between 0-15% in error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T19:10:00Z) - Forecast reconciliation for vaccine supply chain optimization [61.13962963550403]
Vaccine supply chain optimization can benefit from hierarchical time series forecasting.
Forecasts of different hierarchy levels become incoherent when higher levels do not match the sum of the lower levels forecasts.
We tackle the vaccine sale forecasting problem by modeling sales data from GSK between 2010 and 2021 as a hierarchical time series.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T14:34:34Z) - Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time
Predictions in Future [73.03458424369657]
In real-time forecasting in public health, data collection is a non-trivial and demanding task.
'Backfill' phenomenon and its effect on model performance has been barely studied in the prior literature.
We formulate a novel problem and neural framework Back2Future that aims to refine a given model's predictions in real-time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T14:48:20Z) - Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under
Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift.
We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness.
The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.