Mutual information and sensitivity analysis for feature selection in customer targeting: a comparative study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20447v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:00:19 GMT
- Title: Mutual information and sensitivity analysis for feature selection in customer targeting: a comparative study
- Abstract summary: The present research focus on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each of these two techniques, by applying both to a bank telemarketing case.<n>The latter performs better for lower values of false positives while the former is slightly better for a higher false positive ratio.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Feature selection is a highly relevant task in a data-driven knowledge discovery project. Several techniques have been developed aiming at finding the features that influence most an outcome to predict, including mutual information and, in recent years, the data-based sensitivity analysis. The present research focus on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each of these two techniques, by applying both to a bank telemarketing case. Thereafter, a logistic regression model is built on the tuned set of features identified by each of the two techniques as the most influencing set of features on the success of a telemarketing contact, in a total of 13 features for mutual information and 9 features for the data-based sensitivity analysis. The latter performs better for lower values of false positives while the former is slightly better for a higher false positive ratio. Thus, mutual information becomes a better choice if bank managers intend to reduce slightly the cost of contacts without risking losing a high number of successes. Such results show that mutual information, although not recent, is still a valid method for feature selection. On the other side, the data-based sensitivity analysis selection achieved good prediction results with less features.
Related papers
- Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model Alignment [85.38864561060088]
Large language model (LLM) alignment is typically achieved through learning from human preference comparisons.<n>We assess data quality through individual influence on validation data using our newly proposed truncated influence function (TIF)<n>To this end, we combine them to offset their diverse error sources, resulting in a simple yet effective data selection rule.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T06:57:55Z) - MINERVA: Mutual Information Neural Estimation for Supervised Feature Selection [39.57737590420284]
We introduce a novel approach to supervised feature selection based on neural estimation of mutual information between features and targets.<n>We paramaterize the approximation of mutual information with neural networks and perform feature selection using a carefully designed loss function augmented with sparsity-inducing regularizers.<n>Our method is implemented in a two-stage process to decouple representation learning from feature selection, ensuring better generalization and a more accurate expression of feature importance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T23:09:06Z) - Evolution of Information in Interactive Decision Making: A Case Study for Multi-Armed Bandits [22.799405905536734]
We study the evolution of information in interactive decision making through the lens of a multi-armed bandit problem.<n>We show that optimal success probability and mutual information can be decoupled, where achieving optimal learning does not necessarily require maximizing information gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-01T01:01:41Z) - LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection.
We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks.
Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z) - Causal Feature Selection via Transfer Entropy [59.999594949050596]
Causal discovery aims to identify causal relationships between features with observational data.
We introduce a new causal feature selection approach that relies on the forward and backward feature selection procedures.
We provide theoretical guarantees on the regression and classification errors for both the exact and the finite-sample cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T08:04:45Z) - Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection [14.706269510726356]
Dynamic feature selection is a promising paradigm to reduce feature acquisition costs and provide transparency into a model's predictions.
Here, we take an information-theoretic perspective and prioritize features based on their mutual information with the response variable.
Our method provides consistent gains over recent methods across a variety of datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T23:03:03Z) - Utility Assessment of Synthetic Data Generation Methods [0.0]
We investigate whether different methods of generating fully synthetic data vary in their utility a priori.
We find some methods to perform better than others across the board.
We do get promising findings for classification tasks when using synthetic data for training machine learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-23T11:09:52Z) - Compactness Score: A Fast Filter Method for Unsupervised Feature
Selection [66.84571085643928]
We propose a fast unsupervised feature selection method, named as, Compactness Score (CSUFS) to select desired features.
Our proposed algorithm seems to be more accurate and efficient compared with existing algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T13:01:37Z) - Smart(Sampling)Augment: Optimal and Efficient Data Augmentation for
Semantic Segmentation [68.8204255655161]
We provide the first study on semantic image segmentation and introduce two new approaches: textitSmartAugment and textitSmartSamplingAugment.
SmartAugment uses Bayesian Optimization to search over a rich space of augmentation strategies and achieves a new state-of-the-art performance in all semantic segmentation tasks we consider.
SmartSamplingAugment, a simple parameter-free approach with a fixed augmentation strategy competes in performance with the existing resource-intensive approaches and outperforms cheap state-of-the-art data augmentation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T13:04:45Z) - Federated Feature Selection for Cyber-Physical Systems of Systems [0.3609538870261841]
A fleet of autonomous vehicles finds a consensus on the optimal set of features that they exploit to reduce data transmission up to 99% with negligible information loss.
Our results show that a fleet of autonomous vehicles finds a consensus on the optimal set of features that they exploit to reduce data transmission up to 99% with negligible information loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-23T12:16:50Z) - Information Theoretic Measures for Fairness-aware Feature Selection [27.06618125828978]
We develop a framework for fairness-aware feature selection, based on information theoretic measures for the accuracy and discriminatory impacts of features.
Specifically, our goal is to design a fairness utility score for each feature which quantifies how this feature influences accurate as well as nondiscriminatory decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T20:11:54Z) - Improving Multi-Turn Response Selection Models with Complementary
Last-Utterance Selection by Instance Weighting [84.9716460244444]
We consider utilizing the underlying correlation in the data resource itself to derive different kinds of supervision signals.
We conduct extensive experiments in two public datasets and obtain significant improvement in both datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-18T06:29:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.