MGAL: A Multilingual Granularity-Aware Long-Context Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20853v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:19:00 GMT
• Title: MGAL: A Multilingual Granularity-Aware Long-Context Benchmark
• Abstract summary: MGAL is constructed from United Nations (UN) reports spanning 8K to 128K tokens across the six official UN languages.<n>It covers four coherent levels of linguistic granularity (word, sentence, paragraph, and document) and further stratifies entries by their position within the document.<n>This design enables systematic diagnosis of multilingual long-context comprehension across different granularities.
• Score: 24.725846756080788
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluation of long-context Large Language Models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. However, most existing benchmarks are limited to the document level and focus mainly on high-resource languages, leaving many fine-grained challenges insufficiently evaluated. To address this gap, we present MGAL, the first multilingual, granularity- and position-aware long-context benchmark. MGAL is constructed from United Nations (UN) reports spanning 8K to 128K tokens across the six official UN languages. It covers four coherent levels of linguistic granularity (word, sentence, paragraph, and document) and further stratifies entries by their position within the document (begin, middle, and end), indexed at both the document and paragraph levels. This design enables systematic diagnosis of multilingual long-context comprehension across different granularities. Through extensive experiments and analyses, we find that: (1) LLMs perform well at word-level tasks but struggle with coarser-grained ones; and (2) Closed-source models retain a clear performance advantage in lower-resource languages. We further identify two new challenges: (1) Under local semantic crowding, where neighboring sentences share topics and entities, models tend to follow surface cues (e.g., connectives like ``however'' or repeated entities) rather than the discourse role of the sentence in surrounding context (e.g., background, outcome); and (2) A gap between fluency and consistency in generated outputs, where models produce text that reads smoothly but drifts from the source facts. In addition, we observe several patterns in line with prior studies, including reliance on nearby evidence and reuse of options under uncertainty.

Related papers

• On the Limitations of Cross-Lingual Consistency in Multilingual Text-to-image Generation [79.18001266925245]
  LingT2I is a benchmark covering 10 widely used languages with 33K prompts.<n>We conduct a comprehensive cross-lingual analysis, uncovering linguistic inequality and language-dependent trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T14:49:23Z)
• MameLoshnLM: Yiddish Language Model and Evaluation Benchmark [62.936233688546984]
  We present MameLoshnLM, the first open-source 8B- parameter language model built specifically for Yiddish.<n>Despite Yiddish's rich textual tradition, its limited digital presence and the scarcity of reliable evaluation resources have constrained progress in Yiddish language modeling.<n>Our results provide both a foundation for Yiddish NLP and a practical template for language model development in historically rich but digitally underrepresented languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T10:24:08Z)
• LLM Probe: Evaluating LLMs for Low-Resource Languages [6.177998679139308]
  This paper presents a lexicon-based assessment framework designed to evaluate the linguistic skills of large language models (LLMs) in low-resource languages.<n>The framework analyzes models across four areas of language understanding: lexical alignment, part-of-speech recognition, morphosyntactic probing, and translation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T10:03:38Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• Multilingual Needle in a Haystack: Investigating Long-Context Behavior of Multilingual Large Language Models [22.859955360764275]
  We introduce the MultiLingual Needle-in-a-Haystack (MLNeedle) test to assess a model's ability to retrieve relevant information. We evaluate four state-of-the-art large language models on MLNeedle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:02:06Z)
• Multilingual Large Language Model: A Survey of Resources, Taxonomy and Frontiers [81.47046536073682]
  We present a review and provide a unified perspective to summarize the recent progress as well as emerging trends in multilingual large language models (MLLMs) literature. We hope our work can provide the community with quick access and spur breakthrough research in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T11:52:44Z)
• One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support [18.810320088441678]
  This work introduces a novel NLP benchmark for the legal domain. It challenges LLMs in five key dimensions: processing emphlong documents (up to 50K tokens), using emphdomain-specific knowledge (embodied in legal texts) and emphmultilingual understanding (covering five languages) Our benchmark contains diverse datasets from the Swiss legal system, allowing for a comprehensive study of the underlying non-English, inherently multilingual legal system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:19:15Z)
• Efficient Entity Candidate Generation for Low-Resource Languages [13.789451365205665]
  Candidate generation is a crucial module in entity linking. It plays a key role in multiple NLP tasks that have been proven to beneficially leverage knowledge bases. This paper constitutes an in-depth analysis of the candidate generation problem in the context of cross-lingual entity linking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T09:49:53Z)
• IGLUE: A Benchmark for Transfer Learning across Modalities, Tasks, and Languages [87.5457337866383]
  We introduce the Image-Grounded Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark. IGLUE brings together visual question answering, cross-modal retrieval, grounded reasoning, and grounded entailment tasks across 20 diverse languages. We find that translate-test transfer is superior to zero-shot transfer and that few-shot learning is hard to harness for many tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T18:53:22Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.