LLM Probe: Evaluating LLMs for Low-Resource Languages

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29517v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:03:38 GMT
• Title: LLM Probe: Evaluating LLMs for Low-Resource Languages
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a lexicon-based assessment framework designed to evaluate the linguistic skills of large language models (LLMs) in low-resource languages.<n>The framework analyzes models across four areas of language understanding: lexical alignment, part-of-speech recognition, morphosyntactic probing, and translation accuracy.
• Score: 6.177998679139308
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite rapid advances in large language models (LLMs), their linguistic abilities in low-resource and morphologically rich languages are still not well understood due to limited annotated resources and the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. This paper presents LLM Probe, a lexicon-based assessment framework designed to systematically evaluate the linguistic skills of LLMs in low-resource language environments. The framework analyzes models across four areas of language understanding: lexical alignment, part-of-speech recognition, morphosyntactic probing, and translation accuracy. To illustrate the framework, we create a manually annotated benchmark dataset using a low-resource Semitic language as a case study. The dataset comprises bilingual lexicons with linguistic annotations, including part-of-speech tags, grammatical gender, and morphosyntactic features, which demonstrate high inter-annotator agreement to ensure reliable annotations. We test a variety of models, including causal language models and sequence-to-sequence architectures. The results reveal notable differences in performance across various linguistic tasks: sequence-to-sequence models generally excel in morphosyntactic analysis and translation quality, whereas causal models demonstrate strong performance in lexical alignment but exhibit weaker translation accuracy. Our results emphasize the need for linguistically grounded evaluation to better understand LLM limitations in low-resource settings. We release LLM Probe and the accompanying benchmark dataset as open-source tools to promote reproducible benchmarking and to support the development of more inclusive multilingual language technologies.

Related papers

• Reasoning over Grammar: Can Synthetic Linguistic Reasoning Traces Enhance Low-Resource Machine Translation? [49.7935995447581]
  We investigate whether low-resource machine translation can benefit from structured intermediate steps of linguistic analysis and grammatical reasoning.<n>We propose a pipeline for automatically generating step-by-step linguistic reasoning traces from Universal Dependencies treebanks, dictionaries, and grammar-rule banks.<n>Our results show that linguistic reasoning traces are most effective as inference-time guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T15:36:12Z)
• SemBench: A Universal Semantic Framework for LLM Evaluation [5.620203684062621]
  SemBench is a framework for automatically generating synthetic benchmarks that assess the semantic competence of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate SemBench in three languages (English, Spanish, and Basque) spanning different levels of linguistic resources.<n>Our results show that rankings derived from SemBench strongly correlate with those obtained from standard WiC datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T08:56:13Z)
• Evaluating Metalinguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models across the World's Languages [0.5949779668853555]
  Large language models (LLMs) are routinely evaluated on language use tasks, yet their knowledge of linguistic structure remains poorly understood.<n>Using accuracy and macro F1, together with majority-class and chance baselines, we analyse overall performance and examine variation by linguistic domains and language-related factors.<n>Our results show that metalinguistic knowledge in current LLMs is limited: GPT-4o performs best but only moderate accuracy (0.367), while open-source models lag behind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:49:56Z)
• Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages.<n>For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively.<n>We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z)
• Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization [108.6908427615402]
  Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) aims to generate a summary for the source text in a different target language.<n>Currently, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) excel at various English tasks.<n>Recent studies have shown that LLMs' performance on CLS tasks remains unsatisfactory even with few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T00:39:44Z)
• Generating bilingual example sentences with large language models as lexicography assistants [2.6550899846546527]
  We present a study of LLMs' performance in generating and rating example sentences for bilingual dictionaries across languages with varying resource levels. We evaluate the quality of LLM-generated examples against the GDEX (Good Dictionary EXample) criteria: typicality, informativeness, and intelligibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T06:45:48Z)
• Language Ranker: A Metric for Quantifying LLM Performance Across High and Low-Resource Languages [48.40607157158246]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate.<n>We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations.<n>Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.