Evidence-State Reliability Under Controlled Degradation: Parser-Validity Divergence in a Multi-Stage LLM Pipeline

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21559v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 18:50:13 GMT
• Title: Evidence-State Reliability Under Controlled Degradation: Parser-Validity Divergence in a Multi-Stage LLM Pipeline
• Abstract summary: Multi-stage LLM pipelines can remain structurally valid even when evidence available to downstream stages becomes incomplete, compressed, or conflicting.<n>This paper introduces and operationalizes Evidence-State Reliability (ESR), an evaluation layer concerned with whether intermediate evidence remains sufficiently complete, grounded, internally consistent, and usable for a stage's assigned function.<n>We evaluate the framework using GLM-5.2 on 60 sanitized base cases under four evidence conditions: clean, compressed-lossy, partial-dropout, and noisy-conflicting.
• Score: 1.6921396880325779
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-stage LLM pipelines can remain structurally valid even when evidence available to downstream stages becomes incomplete, compressed, or conflicting. This paper introduces and operationalizes Evidence-State Reliability (ESR), an evaluation layer concerned with whether intermediate evidence remains sufficiently complete, grounded, internally consistent, and usable for a stage's assigned function. ESR is evaluated separately from parser validity, which measures structural conformance. We evaluate the framework using GLM-5.2 on 60 sanitized base cases under four evidence conditions: clean, compressed-lossy, partial-dropout, and noisy-conflicting. Each condition was processed through decision, audit, and escalation stages. The design comprised 720 planned and ledgered calls, with 713 retained, sanitized execution rows. Across nine matched degraded-minus-clean condition-stage comparisons, all operational stage-success estimates were negative, and all 95% bootstrap intervals remained below zero. All nine parser-validity point estimates were positive, although the three partial-dropout intervals included zero. Among parser-valid degraded audit outputs, degradation detection was 1.0 in each degraded condition, while false-assurance rates remained non-zero; among parser-valid degraded escalation outputs, recovery was 0.0 in every degraded condition. The results show a bounded reliability-layer divergence in the evaluated pipeline: structural conformance can improve directionally while evidence-sensitive stage success deteriorates under the same controlled intervention. They also separate detection of degraded evidence from recovery. The conclusions are limited to the evaluated model configuration, pipeline design, selected sanitized cases, scoring procedure, and single scaled run.

Related papers

• Beyond Local Accuracy: A Protocol-Level Identifiability Audit for Controlled LLM Reasoning Evaluation [6.047519836191728]
  We formalize a protocol-level identifiability audit over a finite behavioral policy class.<n>The audit requires zero model calls and resolves our diagnostic case.<n>This case shows how evaluation-design validity can be checked structurally before model inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T14:49:47Z)
• Integration-First Structural Coverage for Embedded Software:Trace-Based Evidence, Hybrid Runtime Analysis, and Cross-Variant Consolidation [42.52742840006677]
  We describe an integrationfirst coverage strategy that treats integration and system tests as the baseline measurement.<n>We also describe Hyper Coverage, a consolidation layer that merges evidence across test levels, test runs, variants and build configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T14:46:33Z)
• From Trajectories to Evidence: Auditable Experimental Records for Industrial Research Agents [47.678562263387214]
  Research agents increasingly conduct multi-round machine-learning experiments in industrial recommendation settings.<n>Yet a completed trajectory is not automatically evidence: generated artifacts may be unsupported or incomplete, executed rounds may be invalid or confounded, and later modifications may obscure earlier findings.<n>We introduce an evidence-grounded framework that couples bounded verification of consequential artifacts with post-execution claim qualification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T13:37:38Z)
• Post-Hoc Trajectory-Risk Certification for Modular LLM-Based Security Agents [1.4915002678801434]
  We show that Bonferroni allocation is distribution-free but conservative under correlated errors.<n> coarse-to-fine label selection can create near-perfect measured correlation without learned dependence.<n>A modular certificate using per-stage certificates and a pairwise overlap bound yields a positive average gain of 0.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T23:48:36Z)
• GradCuit: Credit-Assigned Gradient Flow Enables Robust and Interpretable Test-Time Latent Reasoning [61.67411833252235]
  We introduce GradCuit, which inserts optimizable latent states at a selected Transformer layer between the hidden representations of the prompt and the generated continuation.<n>Across five instruction-tuned backbones, three reasoning benchmarks, and two answer formats, GradCuit achieves an average accuracy of 64.5%.<n>For interpretability, token-level gradient attribution reveals that latent influence concentrates on reasoning-connector tokens, while layer analysis identifies early-to-middle Transformer layers as the most effective optimization space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T17:55:24Z)
• Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift [46.502741608809174]
  Conformal prediction is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification.<n>Nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model.<n>We show that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T19:34:41Z)
• Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation [0.0]
  Agentic AI evaluation pipelines produce benchmark scores that justify deployment decisions, safety certifications, and regulatory compliance claims.<n>No formal framework has yet characterized how validity degrades across the stages of these pipelines.<n>We present a three-layer compounding validity model that captures multiplicative degradation across task generation, human-simulator calibration, and automated judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T17:50:12Z)
• From Checker to Forecaster: Code-Owned Evaluation of Model-Generated Strategic Routes Under Delayed Ground Truth [0.0]
  RouteCast instantiates the regime for model-generated typed strategic routes.<n>It produces a provisional forecast-ranking; later outcomes evaluate the forecast.<n>It does not establish prospective calibration, causal decision improvement, route-decomposition advantage, or cross-domain validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T00:36:48Z)
• What Accuracy and Gradient Cosine Miss: Evaluating Feedback Alignment via Scale Stability, Reference Validity, and Depth Utility [48.10132234701036]
  We propose a diagnostic evaluation protocol based on three checks -- scale stability, reference validity, and depth utility -- together with per-layer rather than aggregate cosine reporting.<n>Across multiple architectures and methods, our protocol identifies all failures with wide calibration margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T06:04:17Z)
• Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
  Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z)
• SAAG: Structured Agent Assessment and Grounding [13.62148061055744]
  We propose a cascaded diagnostic framework that decomposes agent-calling evaluation into three sequential stages.<n>We evaluate this framework on a benchmark derived from Glaive's function-calling dataset across registry sizes of 5, 10, and 15 agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T19:33:58Z)
• CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
  Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.