BioMed-Agent-RL: A Meta Learning, All You Need for Biomedical Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21864v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:16:54 GMT
• Title: BioMed-Agent-RL: A Meta Learning, All You Need for Biomedical Applications
• Abstract summary: We present BioMed-Agent-RL, a unified medical agent that incorporates adaptive orchestration, policy, and reward-based reinforcement learning (RL) models for biomedical applications.<n>The framework suggests a new standard for building factual, reliable, robust, and expert-like intelligent agent systems for independent clinical reasoning.
• Score: 6.965381807066163
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The current progress of Clinical Vision Large Language Models (C-VLLMs) has substantially improved digital diagnostics, still these frameworks often endure lesion noises, modality misalignment, hallucination, and missed contextual grounding in complex clinical cases. Moreover, prevailing agent systems usually depend on static and non-adaptable pipelines and lack the versatility necessary for complex medical reasoning. To resolve these difficulties, we present BioMed-Agent-RL, a unified medical agent that incorporates adaptive orchestration, policy, and reward-based reinforcement learning (RL) models for biomedical applications. To ensure reliability, it invokes clinical context-aware preference optimization (CPO), direct preference optimization (DPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO) with dynamic entropy regulation. This pipeline utilizes a multimodal meta-learning approach that operates as a field-specific expert and human judgment synthesizer. The agent adaptively utilizes a set of model-level expertise, such as clinical grounding and reasoner, lesion segmenter, and field-specific synthesizer, across various clinical modalities (e.g., X-ray) by utilizing an iterative and adaptive RL approach. The agent learns to seriously synthesize misleading, conflicting vision cues and trust in inherent reasoning, while specialist advice is faulty. An intensive ablation study is conducted across multiple benchmarks, and the agent significantly outperforms existing state of the art models, such as GPT-5, attaining up to ~73% accuracy (gain of ~5%) over contemporary baselines. As a result, the framework suggests a new standard for building factual, reliable, robust, and expert-like intelligent agent systems for independent clinical reasoning.

Related papers

• Sparse Multi-Stage Expert-Agent Routing for Complex Clinical Reasoning [8.604005197463147]
  We propose Sparse Multi-Stage Expert-Agent, a language-based clinical reasoning framework that models diagnosis as a stage-wise routing process.<n>Given progressively available clinical evidence, the framework maintains an evolving case state and adaptively activates a sparse set of medical expert agents.<n>On reconstructed multi-stage cases from MAC and AgentClinic-NEJM, our framework reduces the average number of activated experts from 17.0 to 3.0 whilst maintaining strong fact-level diagnostic quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-22T13:23:30Z)
• Agentifying Patient Dynamics within LLMs through Interacting with Clinical World Model [57.78184285979881]
  We introduce SepsisAgent, a world model-augmented LLM agent for sepsis treatment recommendation.<n>SepsisAgent uses a learned Clinical World Model to simulate patient responses under candidate fluid--vasopressor interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T11:50:00Z)
• Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
  We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z)
• Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z)
• A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpreting Multivariate Physiological Time Series [9.72130666902599]
  We present Vivaldi, a role-structured multi-agent system that explains multivariate physiological time series.<n>Our experiments show that agentic pipelines substantially benefit non-thinking and medically fine-tuned models.<n>We find that explicit tool-based computation is decisive for codifiable clinical metrics, whereas subjective targets, such as pain scores and length of stay, show limited or inconsistent changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:55:46Z)
• MedRoute: RL-Based Dynamic Specialist Routing in Multi-Agent Medical Diagnosis [49.78267008828593]
  In clinical practice, diagnosis is performed by multiple specialists, each contributing domain-specific expertise.<n>Current approaches in this emerging area, typically relying on static or predefined selection of various specialists, cannot be adapted to the changing practical scenario.<n>We propose MedRoute, a flexible and dynamic multi-agent framework that comprises of a collaborative system of specialist LMM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:50:04Z)
• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
  Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z)
• Multi-Agent Intelligence for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Gastrointestinal Oncology [13.663415863327996]
  A hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework is proposed, which emulates the collaborative workflow of a human Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)<n>The system attained a composite expert evaluation score of 4.60/5.00, thereby demonstrating a substantial improvement over the monolithic baseline.<n>The findings indicate that mimetic, agent-based collaboration provides a scalable, interpretable, and clinically robust paradigm for automated decision support in oncology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T14:56:40Z)
• Revisiting Rule-Based Stuttering Detection: A Comprehensive Analysis of Interpretable Models for Clinical Applications [5.692357910541593]
  This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of rule-based stuttering detection systems.<n>We propose an enhanced rule-based framework that incorporates speaking-rate normalization, multi-level acoustic feature analysis, and hierarchical decision structures.<n>We demonstrate that rule-based systems excel particularly in prolongation detection (97-99% accuracy) and provide stable performance across varying speaking rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T15:01:05Z)
• DoctorAgent-RL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Reinforcement Learning System for Multi-Turn Clinical Dialogue [18.814676128928234]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated excellent capabilities in the field of biomedical question answering, but their application in real-world clinical consultations still faces core challenges.<n>We propose Ours, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based multi-agent collaborative framework that models medical consultations as a dynamic decision-making process under uncertainty.<n>Our approach shows immense practical value by reducing misdiagnosis risks in time-pressured settings, freeing clinicians for complex cases, and pioneering a strategy to optimize medical resource allocation and alleviate workforce shortages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:48:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.