Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22356v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 10:42:03 GMT
• Title: Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AI
• Abstract summary: We argue that, given the siloed nature of conventional XAI, users are struggling to select the appropriate XAI technique.<n>We propose a structural solution: a multi-agent LLM orchestration tool that translates the user's query to the proper XAI explanation technique.
• Score: 2.072266698346574
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) research has produced a plethora of explanation techniques, yet user studies repeatedly show that available explanations are not effective in practice. We argue that, given the siloed nature of conventional XAI, users are struggling to select the appropriate XAI technique. Viewing XAI through a philosophical lens, we offer a formalization of what we call the selection problem: the systematic failure of XAI interfaces to bridge the gap between a user's natural-language uncertainty and the explanation technique that resolves it. Following a logical premise-conclusion format, we show that conventional interfaces require users to translate their uncertainty into a technique selection, a challenging prerequisite to meet. We also propose a structural solution: a multi-agent LLM orchestration tool that translates the user's query to the proper XAI explanation technique. We provide an example of how this structural solution could be instantiated to address the selection problem.

Related papers

• Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions [95.59915390053588]
  This study focuses on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)<n>We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions)<n>To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:58:27Z)
• Emergent, not Immanent: A Baradian Reading of Explainable AI [37.51348424835944]
  We argue that interpretations emerge from situated entanglements of the AI model with humans, context, and the interpretative apparatus.<n>We propose design directions for XAI interfaces that support emergent interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T14:32:40Z)
• More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI into a Cyber-AI Tool [1.5711133309434766]
  We describe a preliminary case study on the use of XAI for source code classification. We find that the outputs of state-of-the-art saliency explanation techniques are lost in translation when interpreted by people with little AI expertise. We outline unaddressed gaps in practical and effective XAI, then touch on how emerging technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs) could mitigate these existing obstacles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T20:09:31Z)
• XAI for All: Can Large Language Models Simplify Explainable AI? [0.0699049312989311]
  "x-[plAIn]" is a new approach to make XAI more accessible to a wider audience through a custom Large Language Model. Our goal was to design a model that can generate clear, concise summaries of various XAI methods. Results from our use-case studies show that our model is effective in providing easy-to-understand, audience-specific explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T21:47:12Z)
• Is Task-Agnostic Explainable AI a Myth? [0.0]
  Our work serves as a framework for unifying the challenges of contemporary explainable AI (XAI) We demonstrate that while XAI methods provide supplementary and potentially useful output for machine learning models, researchers and decision-makers should be mindful of their conceptual and technical limitations. We examine three XAI research avenues spanning image, textual, and graph data, covering saliency, attention, and graph-type explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T07:48:04Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
  We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences. Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z)
• Transcending XAI Algorithm Boundaries through End-User-Inspired Design [27.864338632191608]
  Lacking explainability-focused functional support for end users may hinder the safe and responsible use of AI in high-stakes domains. Our work shows that grounding the technical problem in end users' use of XAI can inspire new research questions. Such end-user-inspired research questions have the potential to promote social good by democratizing AI and ensuring the responsible use of AI in critical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T09:44:51Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.