From Inertia to Objectivity: Improving Deep Research Agents with Noise Isolation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23045v2
• Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:49:14 GMT
• Title: From Inertia to Objectivity: Improving Deep Research Agents with Noise Isolation
• Abstract summary: deep research tasks expose a recurring failure mode: once an agent has produced a query, plan, or intermediate conclusion, it becomes less objective when later judging the consequences of that same action.<n>We introduce the IBIS benchmark, which controls the search observations while varying whether the model is evaluating the outcome of its own prior action.<n>We find that models are substantially worse when they "own" the preceding search step, showing that self-authored action history can systematically distort subsequent judgment.
• Score: 20.84056672956731
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Web search agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong promise, but deep research tasks expose a recurring failure mode: once an agent has produced a query, plan, or intermediate conclusion, it becomes less objective when later judging the consequences of that same action. We term this phenomenon inertia bias. To make it measurable, we introduce the IBIS benchmark, which controls the search observations while varying whether the model is evaluating the outcome of its own prior action. We find that models are substantially worse when they "own" the preceding search step, showing that self-authored action history can systematically distort subsequent judgment. We further show that this bias propagates into two forms of system-level degradation: search noise at the worker level and contextual noise at the manager level. To address this problem, we propose NIS-Agent, which applies context isolation at the two decision points most vulnerable to inertia bias: webpage triage and final-answer validation. Across GAIA, WebWalkerQA, BrowseComp, and BrowseComp-zh, NIS-Agent achieves competitive performance while reducing token cost by 33% compared to our baseline. We further train an 8B model to be intrinsically more resistant to inertia bias; under the same NIS-Agent framework, it attains average performance comparable to GPT-4o on deep research benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/PangSMPang/NIS-Agent.

Related papers

• WeAgent-MMSearch: Native Text-Vision Interaction for Multimodal Search Agents [53.426679066400844]
  We introduce WeAgent-Harness, a multimodal agentic harness that supports native text-vision interaction and runtime recovery.<n>We develop WeAgent-MMSearch, an integrated system spanning data construction, agentic post-training, and multimodal rollout.<n>We also introduce VisTarget-Bench, a 150-task human-verified benchmark that pairs each question with a held-out target image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T08:28:43Z)
• Beyond LLM-Based Reasoning: Lightweight GNNs for Agent Failure Attribution [47.70578021328887]
  Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems often exhibit complex failure modes.<n>We introduce AFANet, a lightweight graph-based framework that models interaction trajectories through step-level semantic signals and agent-level relationships.<n>Our results suggest that effective agent failure attribution does not require heavy reasoning and a lightweight, structured approach can achieve strong performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T06:16:09Z)
• Perception, Verdict, and Evolution: Hindsight-Driven Self-Refining Forensics Agent for AI-Generated Image Detection [80.15317858033534]
  ForeAgent is an agentic forensics framework for AI-generated image detection with iterative self-evolution.<n>ForeAgent achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Chameleon benchmark, reaching 82.18% accuracy.<n>ForeAgent produces more consistent and causally grounded reasoning compared to GPT-5 and GPT-5-mini.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T02:59:33Z)
• DR-MMSearchAgent: Deepening Reasoning in Multimodal Search Agents [24.61813749877376]
  Deepening Reasoning MMSearchAgent derives advantage signals from whole rollout trajectories in an entire batch.<n> differentiated gaussian rewards are employed to dynamically calibrate interaction tolerance.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming the MMSearch-R1 by 8.4$%$ on FVQA-test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T09:28:34Z)
• OMG-Agent: Toward Robust Missing Modality Generation with Decoupled Coarse-to-Fine Agentic Workflows [9.617220633655716]
  We present textbfunderlineOmni-textbfunderlineModality textbfunderlineGeneration Agent (textbfOMG-Agent)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T02:25:40Z)
• Beyond Monolithic Architectures: A Multi-Agent Search and Knowledge Optimization Framework for Agentic Search [56.78490647843876]
  Agentic search has emerged as a promising paradigm for complex information seeking by enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to interleave reasoning with tool use.<n>We propose bfM-ASK, a framework that explicitly decouples agentic search into two complementary roles: Search Behavior Agents, which plan and execute search actions, and Knowledge Management Agents, which aggregate, filter, and maintain a compact internal context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T08:13:27Z)
• VAR: Visual Attention Reasoning via Structured Search and Backtracking [49.427842994857635]
  We introduce Visual Attention Reasoning, a framework that recasts grounded reasoning as a structured search.<n> VAR decomposes the reasoning process into two key stages: traceable evidence grounding and search-based chain-of-thought.<n>We show that our 7B model, VAR-7B, sets a new state-of-the-art on a comprehensive suite of hallucination and safety benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:18:44Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• How can we assess human-agent interactions? Case studies in software agent design [52.953425368394306]
  We make two major steps towards the rigorous assessment of human-agent interactions.<n>We propose PULSE, a framework for more efficient human-centric evaluation of agent designs.<n>We deploy the framework on a large-scale web platform built around the open-source software agent OpenHands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T19:04:28Z)
• Beneficial Reasoning Behaviors in Agentic Search and Effective Post-training to Obtain Them [23.986035712600657]
  We propose a reasoning-driven pipeline to study effective reasoning behavior patterns in agentic search.<n>We identify four beneficial reasoning behaviors: Information Verification, Authority Evaluation, Adaptive Search, and Error Recovery.<n>We show that behavior priming yields over 35% gains in Llama3.2-3B and Qwen3-1.7B compared to directly training agentic search models with RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T00:20:35Z)
• AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z)
• $C^3$-Bench: The Things Real Disturbing LLM based Agent in Multi-Tasking [12.218102495632937]
  We present an open-source benchmark $C3$-Bench to assess agent robustness.<n>In concrete, we design three challenges: navigate complex tool relationships, handle critical hidden information and manage dynamic decision paths.<n>In essence, $C3$-Bench aims to expose model vulnerabilities through these challenges and drive research into the interpretability of agent performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T15:25:44Z)
• Search Wisely: Mitigating Sub-optimal Agentic Searches By Reducing Uncertainty [21.96443267949563]
  Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) by enabling dynamic, multi-step reasoning and information retrieval.<n>These systems often exhibit sub-optimal search behaviors like over-search (retrieving redundant information) and under-search (failing to retrieve necessary information)<n>This work formally defines and quantifies these behaviors, revealing their prevalence across multiple QA datasets and agentic RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T20:57:56Z)
• Tree Search for Language Model Agents [73.97960454223164]
  We propose an inference-time search algorithm for LM agents to perform exploration and multi-step planning in interactive web environments.<n>Our approach is a form of best-first tree search that operates within the actual environment space.<n>It is the first tree search algorithm for LM agents that shows effectiveness on realistic web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:07:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.